Sentences with phrase «p value equal»

Not exact matches

Much cheaper than Samsung tablets, performance is equal, if not better the value is great as it is much bigger than competitors in the same p [rice range.

Assuming that E10 has not changed enough to make a significant difference: The latest value of P / E10 equals [the old P / E10 value] * [the latest index value (price) / the old index value].

P / E10 = 15 When I enter P / E10 = 15 and a TIPS interest rate of 2.0 % or less and a Terminal Value percentage from 0 % to 100 %, all optimal fixed stock allocations equal 80 %.

«If one hypothesized that momentum has similar predictive power around the world, equal to the historical average of value and momentum over each of our four regions, then the ex post «failure» of Japanese momentum is not at all statistically impressive (a p - value of about 26 %).

For starters, and as a general rule of thumb, super-fast growth stocks can be considered at fair value if their P / E ratio is equal to, or preferably below, their earnings growth rates.

Supposedly the shares are correctly valued when PEG = 1, or when the P / E equals the growth rate.

Similarly, for the second experiment we see from Table 5 that once we hold constant the weights of the value - and price - weighted portfolios for 12 months and rebalance the weights only after 12 months, the differences in alphas for the equal - weighted portfolio relative to the value - and price - weighted portfolios is statistically insignificant (with the p - values being 0.65 and 0.30).

Table 4 shows that as we reduce the rebalancing frequency of the equal - weighted portfolio from the base case of 1 month to 6 months and then to 12 months, the per annum alpha of the equal - weighted portfolio drops from 175 basis points to 117 basis points and then to 80 basis points.Once the rebalancing frequency of the equal - weighted portfolio is 12 months, the difference in the alpha of the equal - weighted portfolio and that of the value - and price - weighted portfolios is no longer statistically significant (the p - value for the difference in alpha of the equal - and value - weighted portfolios is 0.96 and for the difference of the equal - and price - weighted portfolios is 0.98).

For differing levels of the discount rate, I varied P / E levels, calculating the initial phase growth rate that would make price equal to value in the DDM.

Margin Closeout Value: The Margin Closeout Value is equal to your balance plus your unrealized P / L from all open positions, converted into the currency of the account, all calculated using the current midpoint rates.

The net asset value is equal to your balance plus your unrealized P / L from all open positions calculated using the current bid or ask rates Regulatory Margin Requirement: The minimum margin required by the regulator for the instrument.

P / E10 = 20 and 1.0 % TIPS When I enter a P / E10 = 20, a TIPS interest rate of 1.0 % and a Terminal Value at year 30 equal to 50 % or 100 % of the initial balance (plus inflation), all of the optimal fixed stock allocations equal 80 %, the maximum that I allow.

Step 4: Set P equal to Q and go back to Step 1: You thusly loop around until the value Q (and hence P) goes to zero.

I value Wyndham Rewards points at 1ct / p, making it easy to compare: A GoFree award at 15,000 points equals a price of $ 150, a GoFast award is 3,000 points or $ 30 plus the cash component and the cash price (including taxes, fees) is on the detailed pricing page.

Statistical significance between the experiments and the control is tested using a student's t - test and significance is determined using resultant p values, where a p value less than or equal to 0.05 allows rejecting the null hypothesis that the differences should be zero.

What I see as the problem is that their p and q values when propagating upwards in the tree don't seem to be weighted, implying that physical evidence at a given input stage is equal to opinion evidence in another input stage (given the fact that this is software, I'm guessing it can't tell which evidence is factual vs opinion.)

The investigators would have been notified of the results prior to completion of the study only if a difference in pregnancy rates or STI rates with a critical P value of less than or equal to.001 was observed between either the pharmacy access group or the advance provision group compared with the clinic access group.

The reported degrees of freedom and t and p values are those for which equal variances were not assumed.).