The music, the cinematography and the overall
pacing of the film seem spot on.
Not exact matches
Noah
seems to work as a
film because
of a plot that is
paced to move along, convincing special effects, and quality performances from name brand actors like Russell Crowe and Anthony Hopkins.
For a
film that's just shy
of being three hours long, it never felt bloated; every sequence
seemed to have its place, and at the right
pace.
The direction by Marc Forster (Quantum
of Solace, Stranger Than Fiction) delivers a fast -
paced zombie thriller, and with Brad Pitt front and center, there is a grounding
of the
film in
seeming more intelligent and plausible than your typical scare flick.
And while the filmmaker
seems to be back at his
pace of delivering a
film every two or three years, the arrival
of a new Tarantino picture generally makes the cinema world sit up and take notice.
It just hums as Affleck and editor William Goldenberg («Heat,» «The Insider») have
paced their storytelling with such finesse that even the most disparate elements
of the
film seem of a whole.
From a
pacing perspective, the ending
seemed a bit rushed as the majority
of the
film focused on the police interrogations, often at gunpoint.
This can detract from the
pacing at some points, especially since the
film tends to intercut between the revelations
of Harry's past, and his friends» efforts to destroy the items which, by comparison,
seem far less integral to the plot.
The
film declines to invite the viewer into its world; events unfold at a painfully slow
pace, while some
of the plot developments
seem bewilderingly random.
A nice change -
of -
pace from the kind
of hip cynicism that
seems to infuse even the most genial
of Hollywood family
films these days.»
Of course, director Nick Gomez's odd
pacing certainly doesn't help — there are times when the
film actually
seems to be pausing for laughter or applause.
It's the sort
of set - up that would
seem to lend itself naturally to a briskly -
paced, unapologetically violent B movie, and while there are certainly a number
of enthralling sequences peppered throughout, Outlander's oppressively bloated sensibilities play an instrumental role in diminishing its overall impact (ie the
film should've topped out at 80 minutes, max).
A veteran action director, McTeigue shoots individual fight scenes well enough, but never provides any modulation or sense
of escalating terror — at no point is anyone allowed to crack a smile, and even when the children are threatened with imminent death, the
film's
pace never
seems to quicken.
Mud suffers from uneven
pacing and while the climax is thrilling and well executed, the final few minutes
seem out
of place compared with the themes and mood
of the rest
of the
film.
The new
film The Light Between Oceans might
seem like a change
of pace for indie director Derek Cianfrance.
The
film seems to drag by in places which rendered it a much slower - moving hour and forty - five minutes than it should have been with such a star - studded cast; the flaw in its
pacing is something that should be unforgivable given the playfulness
of the style and tones on display.
The
film moves at a languid
pace that
seems appropriate for its setting, utilising the true beauty
of Bruges to great effect while imbuing the experience with a sense
of make - believe that perhaps allows the violence that comes to be even more shocking.
That means the
film, adapted by Schenkkan, can
seem wonkish, self - conscious, infuriatingly dismissive
of certain characters — Melissa Leo's Lady Bird cries out for her own
film, as does Aisha Hinds» Fanny Lou Hamer — and oddly
paced.
The final showdown in this
film may very well be the best shoot out in the history
of the western; its length,
pace, and the way in which it was framed all
seem perfectly calculated by Costner.
Leaping to prominence with this expertly scripted ghost story, the director
seemed to have it all: a talent for
pacing and atmosphere, a Rod Serling-esque gift for a clever twist ending (only one
of them at this point in his career), and an easy way with actors, especially this
film's Haley Joel Osment, a rare horror Oscar nominee.
And while the cliched idea
of a body switch comedy might not
seem appealing on the surface, director David Dobkin keeps things interesting by
pacing the
film like a runaway train.
Although the
film moves at a steady
pace, and has some funny scenes (especially the one where the farmers sing), the writers unfortunately
seem to disconnect with the characters near the end
of the
film.
The drained color
of Spielberg's
film should be expected
of yet another collaboration with cinematographer Janusz Kaminski, but it is the patient, respectful
pace and distance
of the shots that
seems so unlike the director.
When it comes to The Desolation
of Smaug however, a
film that audiences
seem to agree is better
paced than the first
film, I'm slightly disappointed.
The borderline breakneck
pace only becomes a hurdle in the
film's last ten minutes, when multiple threads
seem set up for third - act payoffs and hastily abandoned for the sake
of wrapping this puppy up.
The
film thereafter establishes itself as a fast -
paced, downright fun horror - movie ride that's ideally suited to its Midnight Madness slot, although it's admittedly difficult not to question the inclusion
of an entirely useless subplot detailing the ongoing exploits
of Brent's best friend (ie it
seems like the two storylines are going to converge at some point, but this never happens).
The final moments
of this
film seem to justify a lot
of the build - up, but never the snail's crawl
pace of storytelling.
One is tempted to blame a 86 - minute run time, and the rushed nature
of some character awakenings (Edwards's in particular) would
seem to support that, but then the snail's
pace of the talky, inert proceedings make the
film — and Murphy — feel like its wasting its precious, limited time.
I am a big fan
of Statham from movies like Crank, The Transporter, The Italian Job, and Snatch, and where this movie is perfect for him to be in, the
film is just so slowly
paced that when it does come time for Broker to kick some ass, it just
seems out
of place.
At a run time
of two hours and twenty minutes, many might call the
film «boring», and there are certainly moments in the
film that
seem drawn out or and too slowly
paced, but this is mostly by design.
Although the movie had a lot
of characters to focus on and a lot
of story to tell, its running time might have
seemed excessive if the
film's
pacing hadn't been so well - defined.
I have to believe you had all your family members write concuring your terrible review, as everyone I seen in a very Large theatre
seem to love it, I am sure movies like YA YA Sister hood and other slower
paced films will still be made for folks like you, its just a shame that someone so out
of touch with what the «public» likes is getting paid to review movies.Your like the George bush
of Movie critics.
I'm not sure to what extent Franzioni would have written «carnage and splattering goes here», but the fast -
paced gore that marked his previous
film unfortunately
seems to have returned, as has an apparent fondness
of Braveheart.
Most comical
of all is that while only about 100 minutes, the
film seems to last forever due to horrible
pacing and the fact that the cold slows the chase and fight scenes down to a freezing crawl.
Even the reasoning behind the whole alien invasion
seems pretty plausible, and though the
film doesn't have time to get caught up in a lot exposition, the little bit there is never stalls the rapid
pace of the story.
Though the
films are shot in real time, their
pace seems out
of sync with the accelerated speed at which we usually encounter moving images.
Although the
films do not manipulate time, their
pace seems out
of sync with the accelerated speed
of the world and the speed at which we are used to encountering images.
While constructed from a dizzying variety
of periods, contexts and
film genres whose storylines
seem to have shattered in a multitude
of narrative shards, The Clock uncannily proceeds at a unified
pace as if re-ordered by the latent narrative
of time itself.
In addition, the
film presents some great food for thought about our current system
of building codes and zoning regulations, which hasn't
seemed to keep up with the
pace of alternative building innovations.
At first glance, the
pacing, tone, and humor
of the trailer
seems consistent with previous Ocean
films.