Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and
markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial
market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end
market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit
market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended
at any time due to various factors, including
market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general
market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or
at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to
pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the
market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the
value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
The Zuckerberg lawsuits sought to extinguish those claims, and would likely have
paid fair
market value to anyone with a tie to the land — including many who may have been aware they owned part of the land
at all.
If the participant sells the ISO shares prior to the expiration of these holding periods, the participant recognizes ordinary income
at the time of disposition equal to the excess if any, of the lesser of (1) the aggregate fair
market value of the ISO shares
at the date of exercise and (2) the amount received for the ISO shares, over the aggregate exercise price previously
paid by the participant.
The stock grants will generally be subject to tax upon vesting as ordinary income equal to the fair
market value of the shares
at the time of vesting less the amount
paid for such shares, if any.
A participant who is granted an ISO does not recognize taxable income
at the time the ISO is granted or upon its exercise, but the excess of the aggregate fair
market value of the shares acquired on the exercise date (ISO shares) over the aggregate exercise price
paid by the participant is included in the participant's income for alternative minimum tax purposes.
«
At one point, Levandowski said that he asked Brian McClendon, who left Google to join Uber, how much Uber would be willing to
pay for the Chauffeur team, claiming he wanted to have a
market value for the team.»
But potential tax implications get trickier with bonds purchased in the secondary
market at a premium or discount — in other words, investors that
paid more or less than the face
value of the bond.
Because there is no public
market for our common stock, our board of directors determined the common stock fair
value at the stock option grant date by considering several objective and subjective factors, including the price
paid by investors for our preferred stock, our actual and forecasted operating and financial performance,
market conditions and performance of comparable publicly traded companies, developments and milestones in our company, the rights and preferences of our common and preferred stock, the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, and transactions involving our preferred stock.
If a person couldn't relocate their manufactured home, the landlord would be required to
pay them out,
at fair
market value.
«We aren't talking about a ridiculously high salary for these people, but
pay that's
at or below the
market rate for the position tells employees that their work is not truly
valued.
Your property is appraised for tax deduction
at its current
market value, not what you originally
paid for it.
That means there is a good chance that your money is losing
value at a rate that can't be overcome by what your savings account or money
market account
pays out.
Instead of looking
at rates per assessed
value, it can be useful to look
at taxes
paid as a percentage of
market value.
Before the letter was released, Yahoo's total
market value stood
at $ 39 billion — an assessment indicating that investors put little or no
value on the company's ongoing U.S. business while discounting for the taxes that currently would have to be
paid in eventual sales of the Alibaba and Yahoo Japan stakes.
It's a strong look
at the
value of thorough
paid search
marketing, and how Wall's tool makes it possible.
It is expected that, under normal
market conditions, dividend -
paying stocks will generally represent
at least 50 % of the
value of the Fund's stock portfolio.
Tell me, if the school charged the actual
market value for the use of this space and the use of equipment, etc. and if that
market value actually reflected the cost to the public, then the issue might become clearer to you because these religious people would scream
at having to
pay full price and the cost of any damages they may inflict upon the public property they are using illegally.
Treasury, which also owns Rosemount, Lindemans, Wynns and Wolf Blass, revealed earlier on Wednesday that the impairments comprised write downs of historical prices
paid for wine businesses before Treasury was de-merged from Foster's in 2011 plus a string of winery assets and infrastructure
at the lower - priced commercial end of the
market which have shrunk in
value.
He let the
market (supply vs demand) for the player decide their
value at this time and then gave himself the opportunity to
pay the
market value for each player.
Campbell is better player than Theo, he run forward and backward to support the midfield, it must be a personal with Wenger.i got the impression Wenger does not like a threat or someone to challenge him
at any cost.There are few players that should have been sold and use the money to buy a couple of players.We lost on Kanye, ibramovitch, Bailey, and a few others, simply refuse to
pay market value.
CIES Football Observatory estimated the
value of those who have moved on to a new side over the past few months; and they not only reported the players who cost far more than they should have done, but they also discovered which teams
paid significantly less than the man
at question's
market value.
I am guessing wba valuation of Evans was way above
market value so we didn, t meet the evaluation, I think the» couldn't afford» comment is more like «we're not
paying that» might have sniff
at 3 million if you go down.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look
at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their
market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality
at the striker position falls once again squarely
at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small
market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big
market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only
paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame
at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
The City Council recently required Joe Keim Builders to
pay impact fees for Sunset Prairie subdivision
at Peck and Kaneville Roads based on a $ 117,000 - per - acre fair
market land
value, up from the $ 79,000
value established in 1992.
You can do that.We will give you the opportunity to buy the diapers
at market value when done.There may be an amount over the deposit that you may need to
pay.
The goal is to assess them
at fair
market value so all property owners are
paying their share of county and school district taxes.
For example, you can submit a tax filing called a Section 83 (b) election, which allows you to
pay tax
at market value when you receive restricted (unvested) shares rather than when they vest.
Like all public workers, teachers should be
paid at a level commensurate with the
market value of their skills, which represents the compensation needed to attract and retain a given set of workers.
9) Be honest with the valuation of your car — the truth is that no matter what you
value your car
at, insurers will only
pay out the current
market value.
(c) In the event the aircraft is lost or damaged beyond repair, the Government shall
pay the Contractor a sum equal to the fair
market value of the aircraft at the time of such loss or damage, which value may be specifically agreed to in clause 1252.228 - 71, «Fair Market Value of Aircraft,» less the salvage value of the air
market value of the aircraft at the time of such loss or damage, which value may be specifically agreed to in clause 1252.228 - 71, «Fair Market Value of Aircraft,» less the salvage value of the airc
value of the aircraft
at the time of such loss or damage, which
value may be specifically agreed to in clause 1252.228 - 71, «Fair Market Value of Aircraft,» less the salvage value of the airc
value may be specifically agreed to in clause 1252.228 - 71, «Fair
Market Value of Aircraft,» less the salvage value of the air
Market Value of Aircraft,» less the salvage value of the airc
Value of Aircraft,» less the salvage
value of the airc
value of the aircraft.
If we assume that the lowest price point is the «
market value» of an ebook and we assume that writers must be
paid at least minimum wage for every hour they spent laboring, the cost of an ebook and the
market value are far apart.
A donation of appreciated securities held longer than one year may be deducted
at full fair
market value up to 30 percent of adjusted gross income — and you
pay no capital gains tax!
If the
market value of the security basket does fall below 90 % of the ETF's NAV, the fund will ask the swap counterparty to
pay the prevailing swap
value by posting (or delivering) additional securities to top up the security basket (and thereby increase the collateral held) back to 100 % of NAV and thereby
at least temporarily reducing counterparty risk back to zero.
The amount that the holder of a bond will be
paid by the issuer
at maturity, which can differ from the bond's
value on the open
market.
This number compares the
market value of a company to how much cash you could raise by selling off the company's assets (
at balance - sheet prices) and
paying off the firm's debts.
You can call it
market tuition, but like tuition
at college, you don't know how much
value you will get out of what you have
paid.
In the extreme case, being given restricted stock
at no price, one would need to
pay taxes on the full fair
market value if filing the 83b immediately.
Or else
pay taxes on the realized fair
market value at the time the stock is vested.
But in the other extreme case, when you
pay the full fair
market price for the shares up front, does this mean that with an 83b election there is no tax liability
at all (since there is zero difference between the amount
paid and the fair
market value at time of grant)?
After purchasing restricted stock in a company, so that the amount
paid for the stock is exactly equal to its fair
market value at the time of purchase, can you file an 83b election
at that time?
They'll use the amount you
paid for the item
at the time of purchase (which would probably be less than a comparable item
at current
market value).
This ratio compares a firm's
market value to the amount of money that could be theoretically raised by selling off its assets (
at their balance - sheet
values) and
paying off its debts.
If the company is unable to invest their dollars
at market value (or ideally for a ratio greater than one - to - one), then those dollars would be better spent by
paying out dividends.
As a demanding
value investor, it is not
at all surprising to see that all five of Grantham's top holdings
pay dividends far in excess of the
market average of approximately 2 %.
For example, you could (1) keep the house or automobile and the debt (as long as you are current and continue keeping them current)(2) «redeem» the automobile (
pay it off
at it's current «fair
market value») or (3) return the home or vehicle, and any balance due is included in your bankruptcy and the balance of the debt is wiped out.
Bonds are not necessarily issued
at par (100 % of face
value, corresponding to a price of 100), but bond prices will move towards par as they approach maturity (if the
market expects the maturity payment to be made in full and on time) as this is the price the issuer will
pay to redeem the bond.
I don't
pay a lot of attention to graphs and charts, but when I see very few attractively
valued companies I'll head over and take a look
at the broader
market's valuation (Shiller PE).
the interest rate a bond's issuer promises to
pay to the bondholder until maturity, or other redemption event, generally expressed as an annual percentage of the bond's face
value; for example, a bond with a 10 % coupon will
pay $ 100 per $ 1000 of the bond's face
value per year, subject to credit risk; when searching Fidelity's secondary
market fixed income offerings, customers can enter a minimum coupon, maximum coupon, or enter both to specify a range and refine their search; when viewing Fidelity's fixed - income search results pages, the term «Step - Up» instead of a numeric coupon rate means the coupon will step up, or increase over time
at pre-determined rates and dates in the future; clicking Step - Up will reveal the step - up schedule for that security
It is expected that, under normal
market conditions, dividend -
paying stocks will generally represent
at least 50 % of the
value of the Fund's stock portfolio.
If Zuckerberg puts $ 5k into a Roth (
pays taxes on the $ 5k «investment»), then using that money to purchase facebook options
at 5c a share (which only he can do), then he can purchase 100,000 shares of FB with a
market value of $ 2.7 million.