Most of the remainder is
paid by the developing countries themselves.
Not exact matches
And
by robust, Zuckerberg doesn't mean the entire world will be streaming House of Cards on Netflix, but people in
developing countries may be willing to
pay for add - on services like weather and food pricing data.
These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures in European
countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven
by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused
by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held
by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to
develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully
develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to
pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
The U.S. is the only
country among the 42
developed nations analyzed
by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that does not have any federally mandated
paid leave policy.
REDD will work in one of two ways: either with forest owners» earning credits that they can sell, as with Global Canopy, or
by developed countries» contributing to a fund that would in turn
pay developing countries to keep their forests intact.
Furthermore, PES is going to play an even bigger role as the international community debates schemes to
pay countries for the carbon stored by avoiding deforestation, an approach taken by the U.N. Development Programme called REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Co
countries for the carbon stored
by avoiding deforestation, an approach taken
by the U.N. Development Programme called REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in
Developing CountriesCountries).
GAVI does not
pay for animal vaccines, yet it would save many lives
by providing human postexposure vaccines to
developing countries, advocates say; governments could then use some of their health budget for dog vaccines instead.
Hand sewn
by fairly
paid artisans in
developing countries, Matter's latest collection showcases 5 evocative prints inspired
by ancient cities along the Silk Road.
Between 2010 and 2013 the OECD claims that, on average, teachers»
pay has increased in
developed countries, while in England it has decreased
by 10 per cent in real terms.
As for why the corruption, all the obvious reasons: a) the
country's made up of a zillion different historically hostile tribes arbitrarily thrown together as a
country by the Brits; b) life is short, there are few official safety nets (e.g., unemployment insurance, pensions), so there are few moral qualms about taking care of your own, no matter what; c) there's not yet any sort of history of democracy, of regulation of profiteering — this is a very young, very capitalist
country; d) the outside world and all its wealth provides tremendous incentives for corruption — the amount and indiscriminate nature of foreign aid, the fact that the amount of money that would eventually be
paid for, say, a rhino horn dagger will trickle down to
paying the poacher enough money to cover his kids» school fees for years; e) the fact that the west encourages the illicitly wealthy in the
developing world to hide their loot in western institutions (e.g., Swiss banks).
In this
country, taxes are
paid by business organizations and individuals to the central government agency,
developed governments, and local councils.
Do you think it'll be cheaper to cut our emissions
by 80 %, or to
pay developing countries not to increase their emissions?
Those who believe they can profit from carbon credits because polluters with emission caps will
pay for them point to the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism, which allows parties to meet their emission reduction obligations
by paying developing countries to grow forests onto land cleared long ago.
It's an attraction felt most strongly
by investors keen to trade in a fresh derivative,
by Western governments keen to find a way of cheaply
paying other
countries to do the work of actually reducing emissions, and
by the governments of
developing nations desperate for income.
At a time when public funds are deemed scarce, a Robin Hood Tax would create a new source of revenue to
pay for desperately needed public goods — like funds to provide healthcare and education for all and to help
developing countries deal with climate change, for which the U.S. has committed to help mobilize $ 100 billion each year
by 2020.
Funding mechanisms,
by which wealthy
countries pay developing countries to maintain their forest cover, such as REDD + (short for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in
developing countries), could also give donors the «soft power» to push for improved governance of industrial agriculture, he said.
Finance provided and catalyzed
by multilateral development banks (MDBs) will help
pay for implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate Agreement in many
developing countries.
The agreement was adopted hours after a previous draft was rejected
by developing countries, who accused rich nations of shirking their responsibilities to fight global warming and
pay for its impacts.
However, it does not follow that mitigation must be
paid for
by those
developing countries; rich
countries may
pay for mitigation that takes place in poor
countries.
(12/20/2009) A plan to reduce tropical deforestation
by paying developing countries to protect forests was postponed Saturday after world leaders failed to produce a binding climate agreement, reports the Associated Press.
Measures that reduce damage and destruction to the world's forests are co-ordinated
by a UN-backed scheme called REDD + (Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation), through which governments and companies agree to
pay people in
developing countries not to cut or burn down their trees.
In line with the basic tenet of the polluter
pays principle, the $ 100 billion
developed countries have promised to contribute for climate finance
by 2020 must be made up entirely of public funds.
Top Chinese Climate Negotiator Xie Zhenhua has responded to a parade of official reassurances about the Paris Climate Agreement,
by demanding to know when «
developed»
countries will start
paying China the money which was promised in Paris.
The scheme will enable
developed countries to buy emissions credits
by paying developing nations to preserve forested areas.
The Carbon Fund is designed to
pay developing countries for reducing carbon emissions caused
by the destruction of their forests.
LDCs question the fairness of this position and argue that
developed countries must
pay to support actions
by the LDCs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Then a colleague on the Canadian civil society delegation pointed out that it doesn't much serve climate justice, only shifts the locus of climate injustice, if
developed countries accept financial responsibility for loss and damage — then see their historic wrongs
paid for
by a farmer in rural Britain or a first - or second - generation immigrant family in Calgary who
pay their taxes, rather than a multinational fossil that doesn't.
In most
developed countries, all citizens receive some health coverage from their governments,
paid for
by taxation.
Concrete actions
by policy makers, already practised in many counties, are: matching
paid parental leave to the rate and duration observed in Scandinavian
countries; providing adequate public funding and
developing tax policies that allow parents to make appropriate child - rearing choices,
paying greater attention to children from poor or diverse backgrounds; integrating child care and early education under one ministry or agency and thereby enhancing quality, qualification requirements, accessibility and affordability.