Sentences with phrase «paid for their beliefs»

I definitely have a deepened respect for our brothers and sisters around the world who pay for their beliefs with their lives and not just the pangs of social rejection.

These folk contested «civilization as we know it,» and paid for their beliefs with their lives.

Having seen the price others pay for your beliefs, I feel not only comfortable in rejecting them, but morally obligated to do so.

c) Pascal's Wager discounts the price paid for belief before death.

The price paid for the belief position isn't nothing.

Not exact matches

His full - throated endorsement of the Nexen deal, for instance, is based on his belief that foreign investment could lead to more, better - paying jobs, not unemployment.

This belief is held by other companies, as well: The Container Store is known for giving its new employees 300 hours of paid training in their first year at the company.

Millennials aren't rewarded for staying in one job Contrary to popular belief, millennials are switching jobs less than previous generations, even though employers have stopped offering pay hikes to millennials who stick around.

Just as Democrats could not target churches for leaning conservative and demand that they should pay extra taxes, right - wing Republicans can not target universities based on ideological beliefs.

The HRC maintained the prevailing compensation program for named executives primarily based on its belief that the major compensation - mix adjustments made in 2010 would continue to be successful in furthering the Compensation Principles in 2011 and information received from the Company's major stockholders, including stockholders» over 96 % approval of the Say - on - Pay resolution at our 2011 annual stockholders» meeting.

I'm very pro 5/1 and 7/1 ARMs for primary and rental properties due to the savings, ability to refinance, belief in lower interest rates for longer, and the ability to pay down the mortgage.

Of course, doing that work is incredibly hard, but the difference is the occurrence of risk — in traditional startups, it occurs at the jump point — for service based folks, the «risk» is simply having the belief that the work you'll put in to create the equity while employed will pay off.

It does not pay a dividend, and it requires a belief that things will become worse economically in order for someone to pay a higher price for it.

There should be no discussion on the matter... it is wrong to FORCE anyone to pay for anything — ESPECIALLY when it is against their very beliefs.

Perry may well pay for that ham - handedness, but our religion expert wants to connect the dots, to warn us that Dominionism is the belief that «Christians should dominate every facet of life, from government to the arts.»

I understand what religion has done to drive people away from the Bible and their god and they will pay for that but if you would discuss with me your reason for your belief and listen to mine I really believe there is a solution to the problems we all face and until we are ready to have sincere discussions we will not find them.

And I hope that their beliefs paid off for them when they passed.

Absolutely NO, I respect you and your beliefs... keep the cross there, just pay for maintaining it... not off my tax dollars... sound familiar.

Why is it a surprise or in some way unjust for an organization dedicated to belief in God to want its paid employees to share that belief?

Employees also pay as well, of course, but what we have here is a company, under the policies approved not just be the CEO but by the board, that is being forced to pay for something that goes against their beliefs.

If they make a profit on their organization, they do not have a stand on not paying for meds based on their religious beliefs.

It's the belief in Jesus paying for our sins that is the issue.

You will pay for showing hatred to other brothers and sister based off your own beliefs.

most 10 %'s are tapped out because of this somewhat ignorant belief that paying for property - staff - programs is what God is calling us to.

This is about forcing employers to pay for it, even if it is against their personal beliefs.

Stupid things such as, «Jesus wants me to be rich», «the Earth is 6000 years old and every human is descended from Adam and Eve», and «my ignorant beliefs should be imposed on everyone by the government, as long as I don't have to pay for it.»

I personally don't want my money funding wars, it's against my religion, I don't have any sympathy for their supposed feeling that they are having to pay for something that is against their beliefs.

I say too bad for their religious beliefs on this one, either play by the rules or pay - up at 1.3 million a day.

A concern I have is that since Hobby Lobby is not a church or church affiliated organization, but rather a for profit corporation, if Hobby Lobby does win out and can get away with not paying certain health costs due to their religious beliefs, just exactly where would the line be drawn?

They are made to act — and should want to act — as agents of the public fisc who can not rightfully use the tax funds paid under duress of law by all the people — of many faiths and no faith — for the imposition of the religious beliefs or for the institutional advantage or aggrandizement of the sponsoring church.

You must not be paying attention to not only how people will be voting, but / and even more importantly the people (especially the hyper - religious) that are running for and getting voted into office are with zealotry... attempting, and in some cases passing laws that are based on their «religious beliefs.»

As if violating the first amendment by forcing employers to pay for things that violate their religious beliefs isn't bullying.

They should be allowed to express their belief that abortifacient contraceptives are wrong by choosing not to pay for them.

Some how it's felt that values, morals, virtues are not there in a secular world only faceless solid lifeless laws of men rather than what has been relayed by Holy books that calls for good deeds and reject bad deeds and to build a faithful societies, communities, nations since communications among nations or even among the nations of mixed cultures and beliefs... Laws or God and universe are to be prepared by some thing that is equivalent to UN but built on nations beliefs to achieve the code of understanding among nations but as can see now it is build on groundless bases if not of words of God to faiths... in addition to those non spiritual secular beliefs to make decisions of faith but at the moment the secular world make and take the decisions while the beliefs and faiths has to pay for it when it becomes a war between all faiths or religions outside your world, it would become back into your inside among the mixed culture and beliefs of the nation or nations under one country flag...!

I don't want to be paying for your religious beliefs.

Putting up a paid for billboard stating an atheist viewpoint is «pushing your belief on other people» Yet putting a piece of debris in the form of a tool of execution that has been used by a religion for centuries on display on government owned land using government money is somehow «not»?

Why are the schools or churches expected to pay for his personal exploration when they could use the money to pay someone who would teach and support their beliefs?

Toward my belief system, religion is a personal belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keeps one's faith separated from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so portends there to be...

Toward my belief system, religion is a personal belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keep one's faith separated from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so potentially claims there to be...

If you need other people to validate your religious beliefs, then that is on you... I make no apologies for being comfortable enough in my own skin to not feel as if I need to pay a religion to validate my belief system.

«For people of faith, I think the greatest compliment I could pay to them is to respect their genuinely held beliefs and not to engage in some pretence about mine.»

We do not have the right to force someone to pay for imposing our beliefs against their own personal belief system.

Also, for the record, the OP's handle notwithstanding, when people make modern versions of this argument, they don't cite belief vs disbelief in heaven and hell per se, but belief and disbelief in god as the critical matter, heaven and hell being the pay offs.

Why is a room I helped pay for being used to promote religious belief, isn't that what churches are for?

The right to not have to pay for the promotion of beliefs that are contrary to your own.

Why is a room I helped pay for, that I'm forced to pay for, being used to disavow my beliefs?

Because he is a paid commentator for CNN who basically regurgitates the religious beliefs of others without coming clean as to whether he believes in gods, angels, satans and / or tinkerbells.

Since Italy is a secular state, let's not have people of other beliefs paying for the symbols of one they don't hold.

This country certainly does not cater to religious beliefs, given that you can't even say the word «pray» in a public school anymore, and we have a president who is pushing for everyone to pay for contraceptives.

If they were a medical necessity I'd support the move, but since abstinence is a choice there's no reason to force them to go against their beliefs and pay for birth control when alternatives exist.