Sentences with phrase «paid higher face amounts»

Not exact matches

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

It's usually worth shopping around and sometimes paying a slightly higher premium for a policy that allows you to reduce the face amount of coverage, if desired, as well as to convert all or a part to a permanent policy through at least age 65.

If your credit card's minimum payment amount is so low that it doesn't even cover the interest, you can face the high - interest rate and end up paying off your debt for years.

University of Calgary economist Jack Mintz has argued that the current tax system is unfair because it penalizes single - earner families with higher tax rates than those faced by couples bringing hope the same amount of total pay.

The amount over face value that you pay to buy a bond paying higher than current market rates.

A big benefit for those over the age of 80 when it comes to final expense coverage is that while you will need to select a lower face amount than the kind of coverage offered through whole life, term life, and universal life, you won't be paying the high premiums associated with that coverage, either.

Term policies are great for covering you during the years of your life where you need the highest face amount without having to pay excessive premiums to get it.

Now the solution is... pay higher premiums to keep the policy going... or, you may be able to reduce the face to an amount that reflects the premiums you are accustomed to paying.

If the rates are too high to convert your entire policy, you can convert a portion of it (a minimum of $ 100k face amount) and essentially pay the same for less coverage (not ideal, but again, good to have the option, and you'll be able to keep this coverage for the rest of your life).