As ever, the fatal problem with enviro - activists» enslavement to the «reposition global warming as theory» phrase as proof that skeptics are
paid illicit money to lie about certainty of global warming is that there is no evidence of it being a top - down fossil fuel industry directive of any kind.
Not exact matches
Criminal organizations are increasingly using cryptocurrencies to launder
money or otherwise
pay for
illicit activities, according to one U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.
There are a number of legal protections for
paying back
money owed to creditors and also protection from
illicit debt - collection practices.
Apparently in the same manner that he glommed onto the notion that skeptic climate scientists are
paid illicit industry
money under instructions to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact», it seems he didn't check the veracity of the more recently repeated «3000 IPCC scientists» figure.
The science of catastrophic man - caused global warming is settled, no need to
pay attention to what skeptic climate scientists say about the science or its political angles, such as the «97 % consensus» because they are
paid illicit industry
money to lie....
This was a taller cliff for Niose to fly off because of one other anti-intellectual assertion of his: the insinuation about corporate influence, or as it is better known around the planet,
illicit money paid to skeptic scientists and skeptic organizations in exchange for knowingly spreading misinformation.
Criminal organizations are increasingly using cryptocurrencies to launder
money or otherwise
pay for
illicit activities, according to one U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.