Sentences with phrase «paid under that option»

As a result, in some circumstances the cost of an option may exceed the actual benefit paid under that option.

The amount of excess premiums that can be paid under option A is also more limited.

Generally you report compensation income equal to the difference between the fair market value of the stock and the amount paid under the option when you exercise a nonqualified option.

Choose whether to see the difference in your monthly payments or the total you would pay under each option:

As a result, in some circumstances the cost of an option may exceed the actual benefit paid under that option.

As a result, in some circumstances the cost of an option may exceed the actual benefit paid under the option.

The variable annuity brochure states «in some circumstances the cost of the option may exceed the actual benefit paid under the option».

On maturity -LCB- 140 % -(0.1 % * Entry Age)-RCB- * Basic Sum Assured is paid under Option A and -LCB- 120 % -(0.1 % * Entry Age)-RCB- * Basic Sum Assured is paid under Option B.

On maturity, a sum calculated as -LCB- 140 % -(0.1 % * Entry Age)-RCB- * Basic Sum Assured is paid under Option A and -LCB- 120 % -(0.1 % * Entry Age)-RCB- * Basic Sum Assured is paid under Option B along with the last instalment of the Guaranteed income

LIC would decide on the interest to be paid on the death / maturity amount which would be paid under this option.

Not exact matches

Under the merger agreement, Priceline will pay $ 500 million in cash and $ 1.3 billion in equity and assumed stock options.

Under the agreement, Banner - man will issue 3.5 million fully paid ordinary shares to Turgi along with various tranches of unlisted options.

Shares that are exchanged by a participant or withheld by Apple to pay the exercise price of an option or stock appreciation right granted under the 2014 Plan, as well as any shares exchanged or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any option or stock appreciation right, will not be available for subsequent awards under the 2014 Plan.

However, Shares used to pay the exercise price or purchase price of an option or stock appreciation right or to satisfy tax withholding obligations relating to such awards do not become available for future issuance under the 2013 Plan.

(a) Schedule 2.7 (a) of the Disclosure Schedule contains a list setting forth each employee benefit plan, program, policy or arrangement (including any «employee benefit plan» as defined in Section 3 (3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended («ERISA»)(«ERISA Plan»)-RRB-, including, without limitation, employee pension benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (2) of ERISA, multi-employer plans, as defined in Section 3 (37) of ERISA, employee welfare benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (1) of ERISA, deferred compensation plans, stock option plans, bonus plans, stock purchase plans, fringe benefit plans, life, hospitalization, disability and other insurance plans, severance or termination pay plans and policies, sick pay plans and vacation plans or arrangements, whether or not an ERISA Plan (including any funding mechanism therefore now in effect or required in the future as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether formal or informal, oral or written, under which (i) any current or former employee, director or individual consultant of the Company (collectively, the «Company Employees») has any present or future right to benefits and which are contributed to, sponsored by or maintained by the Company or (ii) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate (as hereinafter defined) has had, has or may have any actual or contingent present or future liability or obligation.

Shares used to pay the purchase price or satisfy tax withholding obligations of awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights become available for future issuance under the 2013 Plan.

As discussed in the CD&A under «Compensation Components» and «Achieving Compensation Objectives — Pay for Performance,» we have provided incentive compensation in the form of an annual cash incentive award based on Company, business line and individual qualitative performance results for each fiscal year, and long - term incentive compensation generally in the form of stock option grants and, in certain circumstances, RSRs to reward our SEOs for contribution to growth in long - term stockholder value.

If we terminate Mr. Drexler's employment without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason, Mr. Drexler will be entitled to receive (i) a payment of his earned but unpaid annual base salary through the termination date, any accrued vacation pay and any un-reimbursed expenses, and (ii) subject to Mr. Drexler's execution of a valid general release and waiver of claims against us, as well as his compliance with the non-competition, non-solicitation and confidential information restrictions described below, (a) a payment equal to his annual base salary and target cash incentive award, one - half of such payment to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date and the remaining one - half of such payment to be paid in six equal monthly installments commencing on the first business day of the seventh calendar month following the termination date, (b) a payment equal to the product of (x) the last annual cash incentive award Mr. Drexler received prior to the termination date and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days of service completed by Mr. Drexler in the year of termination and the denominator of which is 365, such amount to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date, and (c) the immediate vesting of such portion of unvested restricted shares and stock options as provided and pursuant to the terms of the relevant grant agreements under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

in the case of our directors, officers, and security holders, (i) the receipt by the locked - up party from us of shares of Class A common stock or Class B common stock upon (A) the exercise or settlement of stock options or RSUs granted under a stock incentive plan or other equity award plan described in this prospectus or (B) the exercise of warrants outstanding and which are described in this prospectus, or (ii) the transfer of shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, or any securities convertible into Class A common stock or Class B common stock upon a vesting or settlement event of our securities or upon the exercise of options or warrants to purchase our securities on a «cashless» or «net exercise» basis to the extent permitted by the instruments representing such options or warrants (and any transfer to us necessary to generate such amount of cash needed for the payment of taxes, including estimated taxes, due as a result of such vesting or exercise whether by means of a «net settlement» or otherwise) so long as such «cashless exercise» or «net exercise» is effected solely by the surrender of outstanding stock options or warrants (or the Class A common stock or Class B common stock issuable upon the exercise thereof) to us and our cancellation of all or a portion thereof to pay the exercise price or withholding tax and remittance obligations, provided that in the case of (i), the shares received upon such exercise or settlement are subject to the restrictions set forth above, and provided further that in the case of (ii), any filings under Section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act, or any other public filing or disclosure of such transfer by or on behalf of the locked - up party, shall clearly indicate in the footnotes thereto that such transfer of shares or securities was solely to us pursuant to the circumstances described in this bullet point;

These conditions include stockholder approval of the performance goals under the 2016 Plan, setting individual annual limits on each type of award, and for awards other than certain stock options and stock appreciation rights, establishing performance criteria that must be met before the award actually will vest or be paid.

If you plan to take advantage of the company's stock options, pay attention to the vesting schedule, exercise price, and exercise time: this is what determines how much money you could potentially earn and under what time frame.

Just under $ 1 million was paid for the options in one or more trades that took place during the 24 - hour period ending at 4 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, the records show.

There is no circumstance under which the traders or the clients of IQ Option would need to pay any kind of cost or additional fees for doing trading with this trading platform.

The lower your score is, the higher interest rates you might have to pay, with scores under 600 ultimately limiting the loan options you'll have available.

If you notify a problem to us under this condition, our only obligation will be, at your option: (a) to make good any shortage or non-delivery; (b) to replace or repair any goods that are damaged or defective; or (c) to refund to you the amount paid by you for the goods in question in whatever way we choose.

No, Peterson doesn't have the option under the contract to «hold out without pay».

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Technically nobody is being denied anything under the current system in the US - everyone has the option of having to pay out of pocket for what insurance won't cover.

On the subsequent page, select the option to «pay by check» under the Payment section.

In other matters, Ameritech would pay the Park District $ 1 million to install underground vaults for telecommunications equipment at 26 sites and to have the option to place more vaults at 14 other sites at $ 35,000 a site, under a measure passed on to the full board Wednesday.

· Allowing counties an option to modify how they fund state mandated pension contributions · Providing counties more audit authority in the special education preschool program · Improving government efficiency and streamlining state and local legislative operations by removing the need for counties to pursue home rule legislative requests every two years with the state legislature in order to extend current local sales tax authority · Reducing administrative and reporting requirements for counties under Article 6 public health programs · Reforming the Workers Compensation system · Renewing Binding Arbitration, which is scheduled to sunset in June 2013, with a new definition of «ability to pay» for municipalities under fiscal distress, making it subject to the property tax cap (does not apply to NYC) where «ability to pay» will be defined as no more than 2 percent growth in the contract.

Under «Rent to Own», aspiring buyers will pay market rents for new build homes and will have the option to purchase the home from the end of the second year of their rental period.

Given the fact that paid membership of this site is little under $ 14 a month, it isn't a bad option either.

Without it, districts with under - performing schools will have to use it to pay for supplemental educational services such as tutoring, along with school - choice options that include transportation to better - performing schools if requested by parents.

Under the new law, parents of children with special needs have the option of withdrawing their child from a public school and receiving an Education Scholarship Account (ESA) of $ 6,500 to help pay....

Under the new law, parents of children with special needs will have the option of withdrawing their child from a public school and receiving an Education Scholarship Account (ESA) of $ 6,500 to help pay for expenses outside the... READ MORE

Under the new law, parents of children with special needs have the option of withdrawing their child from a public school and receiving an Education Scholarship Account (ESA) of $ 6,500 to help pay for expenses outside the traditional public schools such as private school tuition, therapy, tutoring, etc..

Under the proposed legislation, parents would have the option to withdraw their child from a public school and receive an Education Scholarship Account (ESA) with $ 6,500 to help pay for educational expenses outside their traditional public school.

Under Option 3, which offers the highest level of autonomy for charters, the schools pay a portion of their special education fees to the district to administer the SELPA, but the rest of the money is managed by the charter school.

Under such a program, funds typically spent by a school district would be allocated to a participating family in the form of a voucher to pay partial or full tuition for their child's private school, including both religious and non-religious options.

(a) From each State's allotment under this part for any fiscal year, the Secretary shall pay to such State or, at the option of the State agency designated pursuant to section 101 (a)(1), to a public or nonprofit organization or agency, a portion of the cost of planning, preparing for, and initiating special programs under the State plan approved pursuant to section 101 to expand vocational REHABILITATION services, including programs to initiate or expand such services to individuals with the most severe handicaps, or of special programs under such State plan to initiate or expand services to classes of handicapped individuals who have unusual and difficult * problems in connection with their REHABILITATION, particularly handicapped individuals who are poor, and responsibility for whose treatment, education, * and REHABILITATION is shared by the State agency designated in section 101 with other agencies.

It's more than you'll pay for an Acura MDX but well under what an Audi, BMW or Mercedes would cost, mostly because Volvo prices options more reasonably.

I added it to our list under contact forms and let authors know that paid options were available as well.

I know I could pay someone to do it for me, but if I want to do it more than once, or I want to keep my one - time costs under ruthless control, one option is to try to find out what all those people already know.

If you elect to pay the Producer who produces an Audiobook using the ACX royalty share option, Audible will pay half of all royalties payable under this Agreement on sales of the Audiobook by Audible to you and the other half to the Producer who you engaged to produce the Audiobook.

The other houses, the under - editors had the option of reading their slush pile, but since they weren't paid extra nor given time to do it, what they actually did was switch envelopes and return proposals.

Even though, you will still need to pay interest on the card balance, the interest will be lower than what you will pay under minimum payment option.

The death benefit will not increase under option A unless excess premiums are paid.

Under these two options, you are still paying for the closing costs, but you are essentially paying over time versus cash out of pocket today.

This $ 35,000 profit is not taxed under the AMT, but your AMT credit isn't large enough to fully offset your regular income tax on this profit because you paid only $ 5,250 of AMT in the year you exercised the option.