Sentences with phrase «paired t test»

Findings from the paired t test revealed that parents in the IG scored their children significantly better (compared with baseline) 2 months after the intervention in 2 competence scales (social and school) with respect to the internalizing and externalizing problems and in the total problem score (Table 2).

A simple paired T test would be possible at this site.

The AUC of serum insulin response fell significantly after the EB period (P = 0.014, paired t test) but rose significantly after the OB period (P = 0.006, paired t test).

The rate of decline also was significantly greater after the high - protein diet (P < 0.001), which was determined by using Student's paired t test of the decrement in slope over 5 wk.

The rate of decline was also significantly greater after the high - protein diet, P < 0.001 (Student's paired t test of the decrement in slope over 5 wk).

For two - way comparisons, a standard paired t test was used.

A composite knowledge score, representing the percent correct of 21 knowledge questions, was calculated; preintervention and postintervention composite knowledge scores for each individual were compared using the paired t test.

Mean values of T, adjusted for time of saliva collection and usual wake time (AM), were compared using paired t tests.

Differences between high - and low - GI meals were significant at 4 h (the time point of interest) for all 3 outcomes by using paired t tests.

The extent of improvement was significant as measured by paired t tests for each test (Table 2).

Paired t tests revealed significant improvements in target parenting behaviors between baseline and session 2 and between sessions 2 and 4.

In addition, differences within each group were analyzed by using paired t tests presented as means ± SDs.

Analysis was conducted on an intention to treat basis using paired t tests and Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test (as appropriate for the distribution of scores) to calculate the significance of differences between baseline and follow up scores within groups.

Multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) with child (siblings, comparison) as a within - subjects variable and each measures» (CBCL, Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale [CASSS], MFQ) subscales as the dependent variables or paired t tests (LQ) were used to contrast siblings and comparison peers.

Not exact matches

A paired - samples t - test demonstrated significant differences with small to medium effect sizes in the before and after scores for all three subscales.

Preapplication of 1 μm ODS blocked the response to 5 - HT (n = 12, t (11) = 7.09, p < 0.0001 paired Student's t test), but not to ATP (n = 6, t (5) = 0.66, p = 0.55 paired Student's t test; Fig. 4C, G, H).

As an alternative test for receptor specificity, we applied the 5 - HT3 receptor agonist CPG, which induced an increase in intracellular calcium in 5 - HT3AGFP cells; the agonistic effect was blocked by ODS (n = 5, t (4) = 20.55, p < 0.0001 paired Student's t test; Fig. 4D, H).

A within - subject design, statistical analysis using a Student's t - test, paired two - tailed distribution was used.

Based on a Student's paired t - test, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of BrdU - labeled cells when control and flank eyes were compared (p > 0.1).

Other notable genes that were suppressed included stress - responsive genes, such as MME (membrane metallo proteinase; paired t - test statistic = 4.18 and P = 7.37 E − 05) and FOXO3 (paired t - test = 4.89 and P = 5.21 E − 06).

The complete circuit (right most columns) shows data from t - tests (one - tailed paired t - test; n = 29; mean GUS activity with ligand = 7.88 (std.

The numbers of cells produced in StemSpan ™ SFEM II were significantly higher than in all other media (* p < 0.01, paired t - test, n = 6).

For the comparison of the ROC curves, we focused on the sensitivity, comparing the sensitivity between different technologies and samples with paired two - sample Student's t - tests.

After checking for normality using the Shapiro - Wilk test, one - sample t - tests were conducted to compare the overall mean sensitivity against chance - level (0.5), and mean bias against 0, as well as paired t - tests to compare mean sensitivity and bias for the two LEVELS OF EMBEDDING separately.

Statistical significance was measured using parametric testing, assuming equal variance, in the majority of experiments with standard t tests for 2 paired samples used to assess difference between test and control samples.

Interestingly, the performance of Complete Genomics sequencing can be enhanced by adding HiSeq2000 data at 15x coverage, which can currently be obtained by only one lane of HiSeq2000 sequencing (paired t - test on percentage sensitivity comparing Complete Genomics and Complete Genomics + HiSeq2000 15x, p = 0.008692).

When comparing all technologies, the overall best sensitivity was achieved by HiSeq2000 (99.15 % for sample MB24) followed by Complete Genomics (98.38 % sensitivity)(paired t - test on percentage sensitivity comparing Complete Genomics 50x and HiSeq2000 30x, p = 0.008651).

Surprisingly, even at downsampled 15x coverage, HiSeq2000 (98.12 %) performs close to Complete Genomics at 50x coverage (paired t - test on percentage sensitivity comparing Complete Genomics 50x and HiSeq2000 15x, p = 0.008476).

Then, paired t - tests were conducted to test the effect of oxytocin on brain activity in the region of interest identified in this comparison.

Furthermore, a paired t - test that compared brain activity of 4 - mm radii of the peak coordinate identified by the comparison between individuals with ASD at the placebo session and typically developing participants showed a significant increase of the originally - diminished brain activity in the oxytocin session compared with placebo [t (19) = 2.716, r2 = 0.28, P = 0.007, one - tailed](Supplementary Fig. 1A).

You see a study that's running like 20 paired T - test, I'm immediately like, «What the hell are you doing?»

* Significantly different from the fasting control value, P < 0.03 (Student's t test for paired variates).

* Significantly different from the control diet, P < 0.05 (Student's t test for paired variates).

Means with different superscript letters are significantly different, P < 0.05 [repeated - measures ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction applied to pairwise post hoc comparisons (weight, energy intake, and resting metabolic rate) or paired - samples t tests (fat mass and percentage body fat)-RSB-.

To address our tertiary outcome, 1) paired t - tests were used to identify differences in measured energy expenditure and perceived energy expenditure in both men and women and 2) a Chi - square test was performed to analyze differences in perception of effort, fatigue, appreciation and pleasure in men and women.

To address our primary and secondary outcomes, paired t - tests were used to identify differences in energy expenditure and intensity between sexual activity and the 30 minute exercise session in both men and women.

In case of a significant interaction, paired - samples t tests were performed to determine training effects within treatment groups or within types I or II fibers.

Post hoc paired samples t - tests were then run, when appropriate, based on results of the ANOVA.

A within - subject, paired, 2 - tailed t test was used for pre - and postdiet data and height SDS comparison.

The results show an increase in disposition scores from pre -(3.580, SD = 0.499) to postsurvey (4.705, SD = 0.276) of 1.125 (95 % CI = 0.807 — 1.443), and a paired samples t - test revealed that the mean difference was statistically significant (t = 7.649; p <.001).

Mean scores were then calculated across the pre - and postsurvey administrations by item as well as by category and analyzed using a paired samples t - test.

Results of paired - samples t - tests suggest that Tutorials had a statistically significant impact on middle and high school student posttest achievement compared to pretest performance.

The finding shows a significant effect of the teachers» professional development on paired t - tests, t (22) = 4.72, p <.0001, based on the observational data.

We used paired - sample t - tests to compare mean ratings of various sources of leadership.

Sensitivity to change demonstrated through a year - long study of 29 classrooms: Paired t - test results indicated an increase in all classrooms» PreSET scores from fall to spring; t = 10.49 (df = 28).

Differences in appraisals of intervention elements (see the Appraisal of new media elements and usage data section) were calculated by t - tests (comparing against grand average), and for intervention applicability (Questions 2 and 3 in the Applicability of the blended intervention section) and process aspects (see the Process aspects section) paired t - tests were applied.

Paired samples t test between baseline and follow up assessment yielded no statistically significant differences at two times period (Table 6).

To examine maintenance of treatment gains in CBCT from posttreatment to 3 - month follow - up, paired samples t tests were conducted.

These will be used on higher level analysis which will include, among others: (1) Paired t - test to evaluate treatment effects; (2) two - sample t - test to compare groups (responders and non-responders) at baseline; (3) correlation analysis to determine associations with psychometric and QST measurements.

Exploratory, paired sample t - tests will be used to test for change in outcomes between 6 and 12 months, and between 12 and 18 months.