Tests of the efficacy of P2W versus HF2W on parenting skills and family functioning were analyzed with
pairwise t tests, within intervention type, and by baseline adjusted path models using FIML estimation in Mplus.
Treatments sharing the same letter indicate the groups that are statistically indistinguishable from one another (p < 0.05, ANOVA and
pairwise t tests).
Columns sharing the same letter indicate the groups that are statistically indistinguishable from one another (ANOVA and
pairwise t tests, p < 0.05).
Not exact matches
Means with different superscript letters are significantly different, P < 0.05 [repeated - measures ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction applied to
pairwise post hoc comparisons (weight, energy intake, and resting metabolic rate) or paired - samples
t tests (fat mass and percentage body fat)-RSB-.
We conducted the
pairwise 2 - tailed
t tests to identify the difference in means and prevalence across surveys.
† For the planned
pairwise contrasts among the means, the comparisons shown represent two means significantly different from each other at p <.05,
t -
test two - tailed.
Source: 1 — 8 Teacher Survey Round One; 9 — 11 Teacher Survey Round Two † For the planned
pairwise contrasts among the means, the comparisons shown represent two means significantly different from each other at p <.05,
t -
test two - tailed.
The Student's
t test was applied to the bins
pairwise as described in the text, adjusting downward the degrees of freedom based on the autocorrelation in the time series.