Lots of other longer cycles are seen in
paleoclimate data like D. - O.
Not exact matches
Our best guide here is probably the
paleoclimate data, which tends to indicate we're headed for mid-Pliocene to Miocene -
like conditions as we go toward 560 ppm, which again, are about 3C or higher than pre-industrial temperatures.
Even issues which are typically taken to be the sign of a more legitimate skepticism (
like arguing for a low sensitivity), are now constrained by
data and
paleoclimate evidence, and mechanisms that could cause such model errors or misinterpretation of the paleo - record need to be shown by those who argue so confidently against it.
Anyone who would
like to discuss with me the facts revealed by the Wegman report that there is a
paleoclimate mafia controlling what gets published, that they have systematically published erroneous interpretations of paleoclimatic
data, and that almost any paleoclimatic temperature profile can be obtained depending on how you manipulate the proxies, just email me at drdrapp [at] earthlink.net and tell me your name, address, professional affiliation, and recent work you have done climate science.