Not exact matches
Paleoclimatologists have probed ancient silt for grains of crop pollen and charcoal
from fires, for instance, in attempts to say definitively whether and when human beings were on the scene.
In order to understand Earth's recent temperature record, it's essential to understand the impacts
from these natural cycles, says Byron Steinman, a
paleoclimatologist at the University of Minnesota's Large Lakes Observatory in Duluth and lead author of the new study.
The detective story began at Cambridge University seven years ago, when Tjeerd van Andel and a team of
paleoclimatologists started combing through environmental and archaeological data to try to solve an old mystery: Why did Neanderthals vanish
from Europe 28,000 years ago?
Modeler Bette Otto - Bliesner of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder and
paleoclimatologist Jonathan Overpeck of the University of Arizona matched results
from the Community Climate System Model and climate records preserved in ice cores, exposed coral reefs, fossilized pollen and the chemical makeup of shells to determine the accuracy of the computer simulation.
Instead, Columbia University climate scientist Kevin Anchukaitis and
paleoclimatologist Michael Evans of the University of Maryland, College Park, took samples the diameter of a pencil
from two trees in the region.
By studying sediment cores
from the deep Pacific near the Philippines,
paleoclimatologist Lowell Stott of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and his colleagues revealed that the temperatures of the deepest seas rose by around 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) at least 1,000 years before sea - surface temperatures.
Here's a good tweeted question
from David Lea, a
paleoclimatologist at the University of California, Santa Barbara:
After finishing my post on the inevitability of substantial long - term sea - level rise
from Antarctic ice loss, I sent this question to Curt Stager, a
paleoclimatologist and author of «Deep Future,» Kim Stanley Robinson, the novelist focused on «cli fi» before that term was conceived, and the astrobiologist David Grinspoon:
Paleoclimatologists determine the climate sensitivity
from data
from the Earth's history.
Proxies are used by
paleoclimatologists and include ice cores, tree rings, lake sediments (varves), pollen counts, or anything that results
from temperature or precipitation changes.
While we are pleased that some of our observations, in particular, about verification statistics and non-robustness, have attracted academic interest (e.g.
from Bürger), it was not our intent to develop methodological innovations or tell
paleoclimatologists how to do their job.
Let me again introduce some sanity
from actual
paleoclimatologists under the auspices of the NAS.
We discussed his new book, «The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches
from the Front Lines,» his experiences — good and bad — of being one of the leading
paleoclimatologists and dealing with deniers of climate change, as well as talking about the science being done by Mann and his colleagues.
But «big changes in less than a decade» is how
paleoclimatologists typically characterize all of the abrupt warmings and coolings in the best ice cores, though the full time course
from one stable state to another may take a few decades.
I am pretty sure that the
paleoclimatologists who create the reconstructions have much valuable knowledge overlooked by the statisticians, who criticize their work for deviating
from standard practices.
Paleoclimatologists are uncertain how our actions will alter the predicted outcomes formed
from their research.
Using evidence garnered
from samples of glacial cores and deep sea sediment,
paleoclimatologists can find patterns in the natural changes of the past and use them to predict future changes.
``,
paleoclimatologists use measurements
from tree rings, ice sheets, rocks, and other natural phenomena to estimate past temperature...»