The panel accepts his evidence that law school «burst his philosophical bubble» and allowed him to understand why the actions giving rise to the conviction were morally as well as legally wrong.
Not exact matches
In particular, the rules encourage members to
accept a predetermined sanction for given acts of misconduct rather than undergoing a full tribunal, but establish an impartial
panel of decision makers with clear rules for
evidence and standards of proof should a full disciplinary hearing be required.
The following is from a letter given at the Montreal Conference: Our organizations
accept that a strong response is required to the strengthening
evidence in the scientific assessments of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
While the Hearing
Panel relied on certain admissions that the appellant made during the course of his
evidence, the Hearing
Panel also stated that they did not otherwise
accept the appellant's
evidence.