Sentences with phrase «panels base their decisions on»

Not exact matches

«For a long time, a natural consumer who's probably a label reader would look at a nutritional panel and ingredient deck and would make their decision based on that.

The decision to contract with an exhibitor rests with the TXBC Board Chair and Officers, based on the recommendation of the International Code & Ethics Panel (ICE Panel).

«The Mayor's panel may be tempted to base its decision to remove statues on based upon current politics rather than historical significance,» Golden wrote in a Facebook post that also quoted Maya Angelou.

The most common reason for a Key Stage 1 class meeting legal requirements for having over 30 pupils was pupils admitted on the basis of an independent appeal panel's decision or admitted having initially been refused entry as a result of an error.

The Brooklyn - based state appellate panel on Wednesday denied an appeal from Public Advocate Letitia James and several other groups seeking to overturn Justice William Garnett's decision to keep the testimony and minutes from the grand jury proceedings sealed.

He based his decision on the recommendations of an internal panel which said that CDC can operate more efficiently with fewer layers of management.

For this reason, the Panel strongly recommends shared decision - making for men age 55 to 69 years that are considering PSA screening, and proceeding based on men's values and preferences.

For this reason, the Panel strongly recommends shared decision - making for men age 55 to 69 years that are considering PSA screening, and proceeding based on a man's values and preferences.

The panel's decision was based almost entirely on the Jupiter trial, a study funded by Crestors maker, AstraZeneca, that compared a daily dose of Crestor to placebo in nearly 18,000 people who fit the description used by the panel (and who would not be eligible for a statin under the current guidelines).

The appellate panel reached that decision even though the district judge had based the dismissal on a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision that was overturned last year by the Congress's adoption of the new civil - rights...

The panel's advice for education writers: Parents want to know about state report card results and comparisons, because they make decisions based on that information.

The PAR system includes two key features: (1) the expertise of consulting teachers, skilled teachers who have released time to serve as mentors to support fellow teachers in the same subject areas and grade levels, and (2) a system of due process and review that involves a panel of both teachers and administrators who recommend personnel decisions based on evidence from the evaluations.

Key features of these systems include not only the instruments used for evaluation but also the expertise of the consulting teachers or mentors — skilled teachers in the same subject areas and school levels who have released time to serve as mentors to support their fellow teachers — and the system of due process and review that involve a panel of both teachers and administrators in making recommendations about personnel decisions based on the evidence presented to them from the evaluations.

The selection panel, which included teachers from National Science Teachers Association (NTSA) and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), based its decision on qualifications, dedication to inspiring students and overall commitment to enhancing the teaching profession.

The panel will consider all factual and legal issues anew, follow the same rules that apply to a proceeding using a single arbitrator, and make decisions based on the vote of the majority.

Each winning selection was based on a decision by a panel of four highly experienced judges with specific expertise in the travel, blogging and photography fields.

«In the circular reasoning that has become common in oilsands decision - making,» wrote the Pembina Institute's Director of Oil Sands Jennifer Grant, «the Panel based its recommendation that the project be approved on the assumption that the rules would be strengthened, rather than on the likely impacts of the project under existing regulations.»

The panel affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings in an action brought by environmental groups and individuals who challenged a decision by the U.S. Department of Defense to construct a new military base on Okinawa, Japan.

The integrity of the scientific evidence on which not merely the British government, but other countries, too, through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, claim to base far - reaching and hugely expensive policy decisions, has been called into question.

OTTAWA, Sept. 17, 2013 / CNW / - «As the science promoted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) falls into disrepute, reporters face a difficult decision,» said Tom Harris, executive director of the Ottawa, Canada - based International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC).

This framework is to be applied in accordance with the Principles Governing IPCC Work and is meant to guide, but not prescribe, future decisions by the Panel regarding its work programme; decisions whether to initiate a new report will be considered on a case by case basis.

The selection panel will make its decision based on these criteria.

In a 2 - 3 decision, the majority of the appeal panel found the hearing panel, in deciding to disbar Abbott for knowingly assisting in mortgage fraud based on willful blindness, failed to put sufficient weight on the «extraordinary delay that took place here.»

On this basis the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench upheld as reasonable a decision of the Alberta Dental Association and College to refuse registration to a BC dentist in Lum v. Council of the Alberta Dental Association and College, Review Panel, 2015 ABQB 12.

The Richmond, Virginia - based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in an unusual en banc ruling before there was a panel decision, upheld the preliminary injunction issued by the Maryland court, concluding that the executive order was based on religious animus.

Although this decision was based on the wording of the ATA bylaws, it does send a clear message to administrative bodies that an administrative appeal tribunal should not be constituted of an even number of panel members.

They are seeking lawyers with experience in housing issues and administrative law to oversee hearings as the chair of a 3 person panel (with 2 community members) and to draft decisions based on the written and oral evidence presented.

The appeal panel upheld the decision of the Hearing Division in this case based on the following findings:

As reported in the written decision of the Law Society Hearing Panel (which decision is under appeal by the applicant), the applicant threatened to sue the other board members for defamation after he was removed as President of the condo corporation and a notice of his removal was posted; circulated a letter (under a false name) on some floors within the building that falsely stated that some of the board members had previously gone bankrupt, had criminal convictions and were accepting bribes and free meals from the developer of the condominium to settle deficiencies with the developer; made a derogatory remark about some of the residents based on their ethnicity; threatened to report some of the directors to US / Canada border officials, falsely alleging that they were drug smugglers; threatened both the corporation's property manager and security services firm that their contracts with the condo corporation would be in jeopardy if they did not provide a character letter to the applicant.

In the decision of 1201059 Ontario Inc. v. Pizza Pizza Limited, 2015 ONSC 1208, dated February 26, 2015, a three - judge panel of the Divisional Court (an appellate branch of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice that is higher than a trial level but lower than the Court of Appeal), upheld the trial judge's dismissal of the franchisee's action for damages based on an alleged failure to provide disclosure at the time of the franchise renewal.

Our lawyers assisted in securing a victory at the court of first instance and persuaded a panel of judges at the Ontario Court of Appeal to uphold the decision on a unanimous basis.

The fact that the chair of the discipline panel in 2010 also participated in the most recent discipline decision did not create an issue of bias, where the 2010 decision was based on an agreed statement of facts, without anyone calling any evidence.

The Appeal Panel affirmed the decision of the Hearing Panel, on the basis the ruling as to good character was reasonable, and s. 8 (2) of Bylaw 4 was engaged by deliberate and material misrepresentations on or in connection with an application.

Shortly before the consultation date on November 28, 2013, I was advised that the College had received a letter suggesting that an application for judicial review would be made of a ratio review panel decision that I had chaired (which had issued over 6 months ago), on the basis of «a reasonable apprehension of bias».

It may be exceptionally expedient to challenge a disciplinary panel's decision by way of judicial review prior to verdict on the basis that the unfairness allegedly occasioned to the client can not be sensibly or proportionately redressed later.

En bancreview involves a panel of all eleven FISC judges and must be ordered by a majority of the FISC judges based on a determination that «(i) en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court's decisions; or (ii) the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance.»

[99 - 100] However, a five - member panel of the HPRB decided later, in another matter, that a registrar could dismiss a complaint based on the conduct or competence of a registrant being satisfactory [101]; see Decision No. 2011 - HPA - 0018 (a) at para. 71 (see more about that here).

Cyrus» Chief Product Officer and panel organizer Tami Reiss suggests if you want to know whether you're getting what you need from your developers, you should be able to ask a question and get an answer like this: «I made this decision after I evaluated these other options, and this decision is the best one based on what you need as I understand it from our conversations.»

The successor to the commercially successful OnePlus 5T has already been confirmed to feature a display notch, with the company's co-founder Carl Pei recently asserting the decision to include a screen cutout «just made sense» based on the product roadmaps presented to the firm by its panel suppliers.

The request for appeal must specify, in detail, the bases on which the Hearing Panel's decision is being challenged.

Bill, The panel should decide costs based on the merits of each sides case — which is inherent to any decision; the point shouldn't be significantly severable.

In deciding those cases, hearing panels make their decision on the basis of which REALTOR ® was the procuring cause of the sale.

Appeals of ethics Hearing Panel decisions based on an alleged misapplication or misinterpretation of an Article (s) of the Code of Ethics shall be determined based on the correctness of the Hearing Panel's decision.

Appeals of ethics Hearing Panel decisions based on an alleged procedural deficiency or failure of due process, and procedural review of arbitration hearing procedures shall be determined based on whether the effect of the deficiency was to deny the appellant a fair hearing.

If that is the case, why are judgements always being appealed, overturned, re-appealed, and subsequently overturned again, be it via small - claims courts / provincial Superior Courts (single person judgements) or via provincial Supreme Courts / Supreme Court of Canada (multi-person / panel judgements), the latter often turning on minority decisions; they still can't all agree, and all of this is based upon the vagaries of precedents based upon common law?

Each case provides the Hearing Panel's decision based on the facts and the rationale for the decision, but does not specify a specific sanction or discipline to be imposed.

They also serve as the basis on which the Hearing Panel's decision can be appealed.

The hearing panel renders a decision, called an award, based on the evidence and arguments presented.

The decision of the Hearing Panel will be final, except that either party may file a request for procedural review of the decision to the NAR Board of Directors based only on alleged procedural deficiencies or other irregularities the party believes constitutes a deprivation of due process.