A new
paper by scientists at Georgetown University, published online...
That's called ADVERTISING and you do not need
another Paper by Scientists to tell you that works so well it is all but GUARANTEED to Work and shift people's attitudes and their understanding of AGW / CC being at a crisis point now already.
A formal
paper by scientists is expected to be met by the test of scrutiny.
A fossil that was celebrated last year as a possible «missing link» between humans and early primates is actually a forebearer of modern - day lemurs and lorises, according to two
papers by scientists at The University of Texas at Austin, Duke University and the University of Chicago.
Then there was the conspiracy to keep peer - reviewed
papers by scientists who disagreed with AGW dogma from getting published.
And as always I rely on the website where you will find a constant supply of
papers by scientists who debunk global warming at: icecap.us / index.php
Not exact matches
As I've said, there have been a number of research
papers of late, led in large part
by the work of French
scientist Laurence Zitvogel, that are building a strong case for a central role for the microbiome in cancer treatment response.
In the
paper, called «Death
by Pokemon Go: The Economic and Human Cost of Using Apps While Driving,» the
scientists examined police accident reports in Tippecanoe County, Indiana in the 148 days after the game's release.
The peer - reviewed
paper — titled «Safely Interruptible Agents [PDF]» and published on the website of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)-- was written
by Laurent Orseau, a research
scientist at Google DeepMind, Stuart Armstrong at Oxford University's Future of Humanity Institute, and several others.
Other qualified
scientists with no vested interest in seeing a given theory succeed or fail attempt to find flaws in the methodologies described in the source
paper by replicating the processes themselves to see if they get the same results.
A traditional way to maintain integrity in science is through peer review, the anonymous examination of a scientific
paper by qualified, competing
scientists before publication.
In a recent
paper Rogers defines a person as a fluid process and potentiality «in rather sharp contrast to the relatively fixed, measurable, diagnosable, predictable concept of the person which is accepted
by psychologists and other social
scientists to judge
by their writings and working operations.»
Some
scientists believe that an electrical apocalypse could really occur, in the event of an electromagnetic pulse attack, described in one 2008 white
paper as «a high - intensity burst of electromagnetic energy caused
by the rapid acceleration of charged particles.»
Well, every creation «
scientist» needs to gain scientific credibility
by publishing
papers in refereed scientific journals and books and the sort of nonsense Dr Snelling publishes in Creation Ex Nihilo is unlikely to be accepted in any credible scientific journal.
Many of the speakers, including many of the
scientists, starting with the very opening
paper by Cambridge palaeobiologist Simon Conway - Morris, were keen to emphasise above all that whilst accepting fully the rectitude of the science of the biological theory of evolution (mutation with natural selection), yet a «totality of explanation it is not» (Conway - Morris's words).
By the time I made waffles for the third time, I had a kitchen full of dirty dishes,
paper towels all around, two bowls full of unused «failed» batter or better If I say «dough», and one batch tossed down the sink disposer, and I was standing there covered with as much flour as you can imagine, very much frustrated, thinking like a mad
scientist where it went wrong while regular waffles with all purpose flour were cooking in the waffle maker for my dear kids, making me crave them that much more.
Commenting on the
paper, Dr Áine O'Connor, a
scientist at the British Nutrition Foundation said: «Many factors influence total energy intake that can lead to [being] overweight and obesity but it is possible that having more eating occasions through the day, for example
by frequent snacking, would increase calorie consumption and so lead to weight gain.
One concern, according to the public comments, is that the federal panel deemed studies funded
by industry and conducted
by industry
scientists to be more «appropriate for consideration» than
papers by academic
scientists funded
by NIH and National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences.
The
paper is Influence of definition based versus pragmatic birth registration on international comparisons of perinatal and infant mortality: population based retrospective study, written
by multiple
scientists at Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System.
A new
paper published
by scientists in the Northeast finds that long - term studies at the local scale are needed to accurately predict and manage the effects of climate change.
When Hanley and Thompson broke the published scientific
papers down
by the gross domestic product of their countries of origin, they found that Wikipedia articles had a stronger effect on the vocabulary in scientific
papers published
by scientists in countries with weaker economies.
By doing so, the
scientists wrote, they pulled off just what the first
paper described: encoding bits into split photons, mixing them back together and interpreting the results.
Instead of measuring impact
by how many experts refer to an applicant's
papers in
papers of their own, it asks how a
scientist's work can help solve a significant real - world problem.
Three recent
papers authored
by Dr. Peter Nelson and others at the University of Kentucky Sanders - Brown Center on Aging, explore the neuropathology behind a little - understood brain disease, hippocampal sclerosis (known to
scientists and clinicians as HS - AGING).
Traditionally
scientists would grow their network and get exposure
by publishing
papers and attending conference.
It is the first
paper to come out of Lehigh's Nano / Human Interface Presidential Engineering Research Initiative, a multidisciplinary research initiative that proposes to develop a human - machine interface to improve the ability of
scientists to visualize and interpret the vast amounts of data that are generated
by scientific research.
As you prepare to write your first
paper, gather up some articles written
by a variety of
scientists and read through them.
The objective of this
paper is to describe the history of the American Physical Society's (APS) involvement in the defense of human rights and to acquaint the reader with some of the many actions taken
by the Committee on International Freedom of
Scientists (CIFS) to alleviate the human rights violation scientists
Scientists (CIFS) to alleviate the human rights violation
scientists scientists worldwide.
To show how information builds up and flows among scientific disciplines, Columbia University computer
scientist W. Bradford Paley, along with colleagues Kevin Boyack and Dick Klavans, categorized about 800,000 scholarly
papers into 776 areas of scientific study (shown as colored circular nodes) based on how often the
papers were cited together
by other
papers.
«But nobody has yet figured out a way to translate the information gathered
by these devices into measures of health and longevity, let alone monetize this information — until now,» says S. Jay Olshansky, professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health and chief
scientist at Lapetus Solutions, who is lead author on the
paper.
Gerald Meehl, a climate
scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research who was also an author on the
paper, said this research expanded on past work, including his own research, that pointed to the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation as a factor in a warming slowdown
by finding a mechanism behind how the Pacific Ocean was able to store enough heat to produce a pause in surface warming.
What is important about our study is that it is a different methodology than what is used
by fisheries
scientists for stock assessments, and therefore we serve as an independent verification,» says Kent Carpenter, a marine biologist at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, and a co-author on the
paper.
The
paper was written
by Buehler, along with CEE research
scientist Zhao Qin, Harvard University professor Jennifer Lewis, and former Harvard postdoc Brett Compton.
Susan Lieberman, deputy director of international policy at the Pew Environment Group, says that
by focusing attention on Collette's
paper and other assessments of the dire state of tuna fisheries, conservationists and
scientists can pressure the RFMOs to make important decisions.
Scientists from Newcastle University, UK, have found an inexpensive and easy way to validate the authenticity of ANY
paper document just
by taking a picture of it on a standard camera.
They're not pushed out
by centrifugal force, said Argonne
scientist Andrey Sokolov, who co-authored the
paper; dead bacteria, which aren't swimming, are not pushed out with their living companions.
In his research on GAPDH, Snyder came across a
paper published in 1998
by scientists at Novartis.
The results from this
paper confirm what some
scientists have long thought, but hasn't truly been grasped
by the general public — language is language no matter what format it takes.
In a series of six recently published
papers, Wiedermann and von Eye illustrated the effectiveness of their approach
by applying observational data from studies performed
by other
scientists.
In a recent
paper published in Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Woolbright describes how populations and communities like these, known as climate relicts, can help
scientists understand how ecological communities are affected
by climate change.
In their
paper, published in Nature Communications, Atmospheric oxygen regulation at low Proterozoic levels
by incomplete oxidative weathering of sedimentary organic carbon, the University of Exeter
scientists explain how organic material — the dead bodies of simple lifeforms — accumulated in the earth's sedimentary rocks.
In a pair of
papers published this month in Nature Communications and Physical Review Letters (PRL), a team of
scientists led
by Gerbrand Ceder has come up with a set of rules for making new disordered materials, a process that had previously been driven
by trial - and - error.
Many young
scientists whom Morrison has encountered are good at formulating a research question and take great care in generating the necessary data, but they aren't able to «close the loop»
by writing a
paper and getting it published, he says.
Walsh and Lee argue in their
paper that the growth of team science and the accompanying trend toward bureaucratization, compounded
by the increasing emphasis on lab productivity and the concentration of research resources around major funding initiatives or expensive equipment, may have far - reaching consequences for the training and employment of young
scientists.
Yes, and in these cases you have to realize that some
papers are the result of years of work
by dozens of
scientists.
► In April, we reported that stem cell
scientist Haruko Obokata (the lead author of the two STAP — stimulus - triggered acquisition of pluripotency —
papers in Nature) was found guilty of research misconduct
by a RIKEN investigating committee.
The findings, according to the
paper, suggest that law - enforcement agencies,
scientists and others who handle human genomes should protect the data carefully to prevent people from being identified
by their DNA alone.
His concerns about the 1991
paper are shared
by a number of leading climate
scientists.
Though his name is curiously absent from most biographical dictionaries of
scientists, it was two
papers published
by the then 25 - year - old student at Columbia University in New York City in the early 1900s that demonstrated the close correlation between the behaviour of Mendel's hereditary units and that of the chromosomes in meiosis and fertilisation.
With that in hand, however, they found that they could accurately predict the number of citations earned
by that
scientist's 40th
paper with 80 % accuracy.