Not exact matches
GFI's science and technology department is involved in the development and promotion of the science of plant - based cultured meat, dairy, and egg technologies.33 They are currently focused on core foundational work — making connections with organizations and writing white
papers and «mind maps» — and as such they do not yet have a significant track record.34 They have produced Technological Readiness Assessments — documents detailing the current state of technology, and evaluating where more research is needed.35 All the research GFI does is published, so that the
industry as a whole can benefit.36 One of their biggest successes over the last year are the presentations that Senior
Scientist Liz Specht gave to various venture capitalist firms.
One concern, according to the public comments, is that the federal panel deemed studies funded by
industry and conducted by
industry scientists to be more «appropriate for consideration» than
papers by academic
scientists funded by NIH and National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences.
After 20 years of research and almost as many years fighting
industry groups in court for control of their data, government
scientists can finally publish two
papers showing that underground miners exposed to diesel fumes have a threefold increased risk for contracting lung cancer.
After a year - long process of peer review, the DEMS
scientists recently turned over to
industry and others copies of two major
papers they planned to publish in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
The
industry coalition won a court order in 2001 after the government mishandled a procedural filing, forcing
scientists to turn over all data and drafts of research
papers before publication, for a 90 - day review period.
Presenting a joint
paper from CSIRO and
industry groups, retired CSIRO
scientist Bob Durie predicted Australian emissions would increase by 30 per cent by 2010.
Authors of a
paper recently published in the Journal of Technology Transfer interviewed 10 women who successfully transitioned into university faculty or instructor positions after working as corporate
scientists or
industry or government researchers.
Blamed for everything from E numbers to the destruction of the ozone layer, the chemicals
industry has every reason to feel unloved, despite the widespread benefits that it has brought to every aspect of daily life, not least the
paper and inks that bring us New
Scientist every week.
Details of this work were presented in March in a technical
paper «Thermal to Visible Synthesis of Face Images using Multiple Regions» at the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, or WACV, in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, which is a technical conference comprised of scholars and
scientists from academia,
industry and government.
Margaret Thatcher, the former prime minister, evidently does not like William Waldegrave's recent White
Paper on Science and Technology, with its proposals on how
scientists and engineers can strengthen wealth creation and
industry.
It contains our growing collection of
papers of famous and significant
scientists, engineers, and innovators; the historical records of important businesses and
industries that have a strong science, technology, and medical connection; and the
papers of scientific and engineering societies and organizations that have had a major impact on science.
We actively collect archival
papers from outstanding
scientists,
industries, and professional organizations.
Soon's
industry - financed
papers have been debunked by climate
scientists over and over.
«These aren't exotic materials — they're widely used already in the magnetics
industry,» said Argonne materials
scientist Axel Hoffmann, the corresponding author on the
paper.
New
Scientist covers their work only to show it up as scientifically flawed, politically motivated, the result of
industry - funded misinformation and bad moral fibre, just as they did when they reported on Willie Soon's
paper challenging received wisdom that climate change is imperiling polar bears.
She instead inferred that money influence had tainted what he said so badly that none of it was worthy of consideration, which crumbles to dust when she and other accusers fail to prove that
industry money was given to skeptic
scientists in exchange for laughably and demonstratively false fabricated
papers, reports or assessments.
In 1970, Victor Wouk, an independent
scientist presented a
paper at the Petroleum Chemical
Industry conference in Tulsa, Okla. about the challenges and rewards of electric vehicles.
In contrast, when the same magazine, in the same month, reported on Harvard
scientist Willie Soon's paper in the journal Ecological Complexity, which challenged received wisdom that climate change is imperilling polar bears, the scientific argument was ignored in favour of speculation about Soon's alleged links to the oil industry, and that the research was part of an orchestrated campaign to undermine the environmental movement's use of the polar bear as an icon (New Scientist 1
scientist Willie Soon's
paper in the journal Ecological Complexity, which challenged received wisdom that climate change is imperilling polar bears, the scientific argument was ignored in favour of speculation about Soon's alleged links to the oil
industry, and that the research was part of an orchestrated campaign to undermine the environmental movement's use of the polar bear as an icon (New
Scientist 1
Scientist 1.7.2007).
When the same magazine, in the same month, reported on Harvard
scientist Willie Soon's
paper in the journal Ecological Complexity, which challenged received wisdom that climate change is imperilling polar bears, the scientific argument was ignored in favour of speculation about Soon's alleged links to the oil
industry, and that the research was part of an orchestrated campaign to undermine the environmental movement's use of the polar bear as an icon.
For all the length of this student's
paper, it could just have easily been distilled to a single sentence: «The science of man - caused global warming is settled, skeptic climate
scientists are paid
industry money to lie about it being not settled, and everybody may ignore those skeptics because of those first two points.»