Is there anecdotal evidence by those involved in authoring the papers of any unusual delays or unusual processes imposed by the journals wrt the reviews and acceptance of those papers that caused them to miss the AR5 deadline for
paper submittal?
In their latest Science
paper submittal Jim Hansen, et al. argue that we must reduce atmospheric CO2 to below 350 ppm because so - called «slow feedbacks» such as changes in ice sheet albedo are occurring much faster than expected.
Not exact matches
Here we offer preliminary constructive criticism, noting some issues we have identified with the
paper in its current form, which we suggest the authors address prior to
submittal to a journal.