Sentences with phrase «papers claim the case»

Not exact matches

As the private email exchanges (and, perhaps, «clarifications») were insufficient to fully address Kahan's concerns, in the end Kahan & Peters (2017) elected to publish a formal «reply» paper of their own to make their case against Ballarini & Sloman's 2017 claims about «replication» (or, more specifically, the lack thereof).

In papers submitted by the UK Government last year in the case and seen by the BHA, the Government attempted to argue that there is no breach of EU law because «if a teacher brought a claim against a school (on the basis that the school, as an employer, had discriminated against them in their remuneration, for example), then the court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider context.

During a bill signing, Cuomo pointed to his Italian heritage to make the case that he was an «undocumented person,» stating his family had been taunted with slurs like «wop,» which he claimed meant «without papers.»

The case has gone through multiple hearings (details below), resulting in a court order that requires DEMS scientists to turn over all data related to DEMS, including drafts of scientific papers based on that data, to the mining coalition and to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Education and the Workforce, which claims jurisdiction over the study.

One news report over the weekend even claimed that a paper on the discovery had been submitted to Science, as had been the case a decade ago.

In the paper «Banning Smoking In Parks and on Beaches: Science, Policy, and the Politics of Denormalization,» published in the July issue of the journal Health Affairs, researchers at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health analyzed the evidence for these claims and found them to be far from definitive and, in some cases, weak.

Your admiration for authors of note is also misguided; case in point: James Patterson, who writes 20 percent of his books, yet has the audacity to claim authorship of the other 80 percent, and which, by the way, in my opinion, are not even worth the paper on which they are printed, And then there is the Mary Higgins Clark junk that she has now passed on to her daughter so she has something to do with her time.

The body of the paper should be in the general configuration of case, proof, claim, and confirmation, to keep things clear.

In that case, keeping the returns seemed the right thing to do to have the paper trail for basis, else I could claim anything, and hope for the best.

Say, if such a case goes to court — what if they argue that they sent a revised paper statement and I am claiming that I did not receive it to take advantage of the first statement?

In this case the fake authority who makes the final headline claim is Ian Elliott, an ex-astronomer who pensioned 12 years ago and has only few papers published during his professional career, none of which about the solar influence on Earths climate.

However, in this case (and others) a flurry of hastily prepared papers appeared, claiming errors in our

Prof. Curry, perhaps you would be kind enough to reconcile the claim in your written testimony that increasing Antarctic sea ice extent as reported in the AR5 WGI report weakens the case for attributing most of the warming to human influences can be reconciled with your 2010 PNAS paper, Accelerated warming of the Southern Ocean and its impacts on the hydrological cycle and sea ice the abstract of which reads:

Claims after the fact that the paper was about advancing our understanding of the planet's climate 10,000 years ago appear to be a case of back tracking and cover up.

5) In 2005 McIntrye and McKitrick publish a paper in GRL claiming that «hockey sticks» would come out of the MBH method even in the case of systematically trend - free red noise.

Send me TWO links, one to the paper claiming the detection of solar sunspot - cycle related effects on surface datasets that you think is the strongest evidence for your case, and the second to the actual data used in that study.

In the case of the peer - reviewed papers showing that the surface temperature data is contaminated, the IPCC dealt with that by simply fabricating non-existent counter-evidence in the form of a claim that the effects can be attributed to atmospheric circulation patterns, and on doing so the contamination pattern becomes statistically insignificant.

I haven't read the specific Hansen paper cited here, but he has been the subject of beat - ups before (e.g., his early models showed a range of scenarios and some in the anti-AGW camp have conveniently only taken his worst case which he himself said was unlikely, and used this to claim he was out by a factor of 3).

Since then, literally thousands of papers have made this case very carefully, tens to hundreds of thousands of climate simulations have been run, model errors have been corrected and resolution improved, hundreds of problems in the science have been corrected and claims that humans aren't the source have all been addressed.

This is partly evidenced by the fact once the option is selected, a piece of paper is produced that claims that you've appeared, pleaded no - contest and waived your right to a judge or a jury trial, at which point you're found guilty, with a deferred judgment, and with the option of case dismissal should certain conditions be satisfied.

They will probably be used to draft the papers that will be lodged at Court if proceedings are issued, (called the Particulars of Claim), and if the case goes to trial a barrister will present your case to the Judge.

Our lawyers also prepare all necessary legal documentation and papers needed to take action against mortgage companies that fail to pay homeowners insurance in hurricane claims cases.

A Mayer - Brown paper was only able to obtain data on six settlements - in these cases, claims rates were 0.000006 %, 0.33 %, 1.5 %, 9.66 % and 12 %.

Thereafter (with very few exceptions) the claim proceeds as it would have done 20, or even 200 years ago — relying on the manual handling of paper files, albeit with a computerised case tracking and management system.

Therefore, the homologation process in Ecuador implies that the party that seeks the enforcement of a foreign award shall file a petition with the Provincial Court8, which will assess whether the award complies with the following requirements: (i) The international award complies with the formalities required for it to be considered authentic in the state where it was issued; (ii) The award is final and binding in the jurisdiction where it was delivered and the attachments are duly legalized; (iii) With regard to the requirement prescribed in the Convention, if the award is in a language other than the official language of the country, in this case Spanish, it shall incorporate a translation; (iv) It is shown from the legal papers of the arbitration proceedings that the party against whom the awards is being enforced was duly notified of the claim and that there was no due process violation; (v) The petition must specify the domicile of the party against whom the award is being enforced.

[77] In this case the plaintiff is generally credible, and I do not fault her for a commendable desire to avoid making a nuisance of herself by going to a doctor primarily in order to build a documentary records and thus avoid the risk of an adverse inference from failing to do so, or out of a misguided belief that by papering her medical files, she can prove her claim.

For many years now there have been «preliminary discussions» among interested parties about streamlining lower value claims but the government's consultation paper; Case Track Limits and the Claims Process for Personal Injury Claims published on 20 April 2007, resulted in a frenzy of activity from all stakehoclaims but the government's consultation paper; Case Track Limits and the Claims Process for Personal Injury Claims published on 20 April 2007, resulted in a frenzy of activity from all stakehoClaims Process for Personal Injury Claims published on 20 April 2007, resulted in a frenzy of activity from all stakehoClaims published on 20 April 2007, resulted in a frenzy of activity from all stakeholders.

The green paper followed an earlier consultation paper, Study on the Conditions of Claims for Damages in case of Infringement of EC Competition Rules (2004), which reviewed systems for private redress in competition law throughout the EU and highlighted recognised gaps in the regulatory regime.

If you didn't see «hone their QuickLaw skills noting up cases,» «undertake due diligence on reams of paper in a drawn - out discovery process» or «serve a Statement of Claim on an elusive defendant» on that list, it's probably because the articling process ostensibly should involve these sorts of things only occasionally.

Even if you don't think it's necessary to call the police, having a police report as a paper trail may be helpful in case your insurance company or the other motorist's insurer denies the claim.

It's not a fun conversation, but they need to know where to find your important papers and how to file a claim in case they ever need to.

However, at the time of claim settlement, he implied, that the insurers reject the claim by stating that it was a pre-existing condition, etc which would not be the case if I did all the paper - work (and paid higher premium).

Of note is one of the more interesting claims in the paper, one that alleges the approach provides a better alternative to other private blockchains, at least for some use cases.

Once the deadline for sending us case statements has passed we will send a copy of all the papers we have received about the claim to both you and the Responsible Body.

Claiming these credits by filing online and using direct deposit will, in most cases, help Canadians to receive a refund in as little as eight days, compared to four to six weeks for a paper return» says Navtaj Chandhoke, founder of Professional Real Estate Investors Group (PREIG) Canada, the largest Real Estate Investors network group in Canada.