The four
papers discuss the findings and implications of research done by Campbell and her colleagues at the University of California at Berkeley, with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Not exact matches
Yet we seem to
find it's perfectly acceptable to
discuss things with them while reading the
paper, folding clothes, or working on the computer, and then are often left wondering when the lines of communication broke.
Webel and six co-authors
discuss their
findings in a
paper published this month in the journal PLOS ONE.
Almost 20 years ago, an adviser commented to a group of us
discussing where to send our
papers that it doesn't really matter what journal your work is published in, because if the science is good enough people will
find it, read it, and cite it.
Earlier this year, Thelwall and Cassidy Sugimoto at Indiana University Bloomington
found that research
papers widely
discussed on Twitter, heavily posted to Facebook, or
discussed on internet forums and blogs are statistically more likely to be cited in scientific
papers at a later date.
Beletsky — who recently helped the U.S. Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Assistance design a naloxone toolkit for police — will
discuss the
paper's
findings at a scientific workshop at the Food and Drug Administration in July.
Peiris and his co-workers declined to
discuss the
findings in detail because they have submitted a
paper for publication that describes the new virus.
In this
paper I will
discuss some of the shortcomings of a reductionist view of research aimed at
finding treatments against ageing degeneration, and I will highlight several areas where proposed future treatments for basic age - related degeneration may be vulnerable to severe criticism.
Most of the
papers in the special edition
discuss new fossil
findings from the paleontological digs.
Using this equation, CotSS = 328 ng / mL (see above), CLcot = 0.52 mL / min, measured in 25 g C57BL / 6 mice (Siu & Tyndale, 2006), R = 1.09, and assuming that the body weight of C57BL / 6 mice used in the
discussed study was 25g (we were unable to
find the body weight in the
paper), Ko nic can be calculated as 583 ng / 25g / min (2.1 mg / kg / 90 min).
The
paper discussed the validity of the proposed connection between exercise sequence and muscle growth and reported that two new studies have failed to
find substantial evidence to support the «size principle of motor unit recruitment» theory.
A recent
paper, Capsaicinoids Enhance Metabolic Rate in Normal Healthy Individuals using a Novel Metabolic Tracker Breezing Device - An Open Label Placebo Controlled Acute Study, published in the journal Obesity Open Access
discussed the
findings of...
And this letter in the Nutritional Neuroscience
discussing the
paper's
findings: Oxidative Stress Might Reduce Essential Fatty Acids in Erythrocyte Membranes of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients http://cfids-cab.org/cfs-inform/Hypotheses/nijs.demeirleir04.pdf
Ions, Atoms and Charged Particles - This
paper discusses the forms of silver that are
found in colloidal silver, specifically, silver ions, and silver particles and the electrical charges associated with each.
In this article, Mark Chambers, CEO of Naace,
discusses the
findings of this year's Leadership Briefing
Paper — published in association with the British Educational Suppliers Association (BESA) and C3 Education — and provides advice on how to make the best of your school's education technology, as well as how to effectively prepare for the future.
Here's a video link to the
paper, where the lead author
discusses the
findings in detail:
Therefore, professional custom term
papers writer briefly reviews the procedures,
findings, and overall ideas of the problem
discussed in the main body (you can do it yourself using this guide: http://custom-essay-writing-service.org/blog/what-you-need-for-writing-a-term-paper).
To
find additional investing reports that
discuss the greater and unwarranted management expense ratios, brokerage firm trading fees, plus taxes that come along with investment funds study these financial research
papers:
The
paper also
discusses in some detail a phenomenon that I
find deeply fascinating, mean reversion in earnings predicted by low price - to - book values:
Other
papers examining the returns over different periods and in different markets written after Oppenheimer's
paper have
found similar results (one of the
papers is by Montier and I will be
discussing it in some detail in the near future).
-LSB-...]
paper also
discusses in some detail a phenomenon that I
find deeply fascinating, mean reversion in earnings predicted by low price - to - book values: Research (in Fama and French 1992, for example) shows that -LSB-...]
More recently a
paper discussed the results of a necropsy and toxicologic
finding on a patient that developed hepatic failure due to an ingestion of joint supplement overdose.
Thomas Demand:
Paper Weight The German Artist Talks TMZ and Evil's Kitchen from his LA Studio Conceptual artist Thomas Demand
discusses how an encounter with a picture on a celebrity gossip website instigated his latest work
find out more over at: NOWNESS.com
If not, see if you can
find that online, or the
papers referring to and
discussing it.
Next, we
discuss the first of three so - called «bombshell»
papers that supposedly «knock the stuffing out of» the
findings of the IPCC.
If you spent any time reading here, you would also
find that we rarely
discuss any of the over 30
papers a year collectively (estimate) we publish.
[Response: If there was a
paper or a
finding, then one would clearly prefer to
discuss that.
So, I knew I'd
find papers discussing experimental studies of the effect of aerosols at meetings that Jim attended!
Apart from the fundamental scientific advances of the breakthrough
papers, there is an hierarchy of classes of lesser
papers, along the lines of those which — • Confirm or deny the main thrust of a breakthrough
paper by arriving from other angles • Provide an alternative or improvement to the main
findings of breakthrough
papers • Contribute more observation to the breakthrough
paper and
discuss its relevance • Seek to set a complementary base for a breakthrough in a related aspect of science • Report the views of a clutch of authors about a topic they deem to have political importance • Ditto for educational importance • Write
papers that are knowingly lacking good science to place authors in one camp or another • Lambast an author or authors for being on the «wrong» side of a polarised topic • Perform meta analysis Etc..
Time.com has published an op - ed article by Bjorn Lomborg
discussing the
findings from our recent set of research
papers focused on Energy.
I
found a correct link for the
paper we're
discussing.
Ferdinand, There are numerous
papers which
discuss the data showing a reduction of albedo, but I have not
found any which set that in the context of climate sensitivity.
There are several
papers that
discuss this observed phenomena during past minima and I am currently researching the differential latitude speeds but
finding the data hard to come by.
Nicola Scafetta says: October 29, 2012 at 7:55 am in this figure he repeats my spectral analysis showing that the Schwabe 11 - year sunspot number cycle can be decomposed in three peaks -LSB-...] which is the major
finding in
paper on which I build my model About the «three peaks»: here is my analysis of those [from Monday, January 26, 2009, 11:17:46 PM] and «published» on a blog the same day http://www.leif.org/research/Vuk-SAM.pdf slide 2
discussing Vuk's «sunspot formula».
If you go to Google and search for
papers that
discuss the value of Objective Bayesian methods or Jeffreys» prior, you will
find out that even statisticians that defend their use are fully aware of their limitations.
But I've
found the following
papers to be helpful in
discussing how to attribute climate change to anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic factors:
The results of these
papers were included into the revised text and
discussed in a broader context of the other
findings.
In my first post on the ongoing McLean et al (2009) kerfuffle, I
discussed the role of the various lobby groups in promoting and exaggerating the
findings of this abysmal
paper.
Every scientific
paper that presents original research should concentrate on what new the authors have
found out, but that must also be put in proper connection with other knowledge without spending too much space on speculations or
discussing in length issues not studied in that particular work.
We have recently
discussed several
papers which have
found substantial global dimming as a result of increased human aerosol emissions from 1950 to 1980 and 2000 to 2010.
In any case, if 5 to 30 percent of the current decline is considered «a considerable fraction,» then it is consistent with the
findings of Environmental Research Letters
paper discussed above.
Finally, Neil again
discussed the
paper I co-authored
finding a 97 percent consensus in the peer - reviewed literature that humans are causing global warming.
In the second hockeystick
paper, the MWP was
discussed, and the authors suggested that they might have
found evidence for the MWP being at least hemispheric in scale.
Hawkins has also written a blog post about his new Callendar
paper, which delves deeper into why Callendar's
findings were not immediately acted upon, or even
discussed until decades later:
I just
found this
paper which introduces a new climate forcing which you may wish to
discuss here.
In addition to describing the study, the
paper discusses the theoretical and practical implications of these
findings.
Some suggestions might be for a list of key
papers discussing the results of these reanalyses and lists of issues
found (so that others don't waste their time).
As surveys should be interpreted as consistent if they can be, that means Cook et al
find that 97 % of
papers discussing the issue endorse the theory that > 50 % of recent warming has been anthropogenic in origin.
But if you look closely at what the
paper actually says instead of how 3rd parties describe it, you will
find that even a
paper that just
discusses method of carbon sequestration is considered to be part of the 97 % that «endorses AGW».
However, two recent
papers published in Science, including the one we
discussed in our post, have pointed out that when you take into account land use changes, the global warming pollution benefit of corn ethanol is negligible or not a benefit at all but a negative (researcher Joseph Fargione's team
found that most biofuels «create a «biofuel carbon debt» by releasing 17 to 420 times more CO2 than the annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions that these biofuels would provide by displacing fossil fuels.»)