In a set of
papers on carbon pricing released last week by the Scholars Strategy Network (which is what triggered all this), two of the scholars, economist James K. Boyce of the University of Massachusetts Amherst and Michael Howard of the University of Maine, argue for tax - and - dividend.
Not exact matches
Share: FacebookTwitterLinkedinGoogle + emailOTTAWA — Clare Demerse, federal policy advisor at Clean Energy Canada, made the following comments in response to today's federal
carbon pricing discussion
paper: «This proposal is a big step forward
on a key climate commitment, and the approach Ottawa has chosen is a promising one.
The budget re-states Ottawa's goal — a national
price on carbon across the country in 2018 — and says to expect a
paper outlining «the technical details of the proposed federal
carbon pricing backstop mechanism» in the coming months.
The best recent representation of Sachs's views is the
paper he and others co-authored with James E. Hansen, the longtime NASA climate scientist who now has a climate policy position at Columbia, in which they build
on Hansen's longstanding call for a rising
price on carbon.
The goal of the
paper I have just written is to «restart» the discussion of climate change, which, as I see it, is
on the verge of disappearing from view, putting into cold storage both 1) the policy initiatives like
carbon prices and regulations that could have short - term impact
on wedge technologies like conventional renewables, efficiency, and CCS, and 2) commitments to the advancement of a climate - change - driven research frontier.
I'd argue we should not be implementing costly and economically damaging
carbon pricing policies (like Australia's CO2 tax and ETS)
on the basis of such
papers.
Meanwhile, New York is seriously considering instituting a
carbon charge approach to
pricing in its markets, and a 2017 PJM working
paper raised the possibility of implementing a
carbon price either across the PJM footprint or
on a sub-regional basis.
Today, regulators released a discussion
paper that seeks advice
on the type of program to be implemented, but makes clear that
carbon pricing will be coming to the Canadian province in some format.