Sentences with phrase «papers reached the conclusion»

Around 97 % of published papers reached the conclusion that humans contribute to climate change.

Not exact matches

That spring, it was obvious to Knight that the conclusion reached in his graduate paper had been confirmed: The market for athletic shoes was strong and growing stronger.

The paper's authors apply a simple model of the world oil market to reach their conclusions, which are driven by the potential for the pipeline to increase global oil supply, thus lowering oil prices and increasing consumption.

Ron and Shamir seem to have used flow analysis of the Bitcoin blockchain to reach these conclusions, as they did in their first paper on the subject, however without doing the required research into the actual identities of the Bitcoin address owners, using flow analysis among them to determine relationships between them is fundamentally flawed.

There is no doubt Arsenal are vulnerable on paper, a team desperate for the season to reach its predictable conclusion, but even a half - hearted Arsenal should be too strong for a Villa side who haven't travelled at all well all season.

After I sent an embargoed version of the S.M.U. paper to Craig Pearson, a seismologist who works for the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC)-- the state agency that regulates oil and gas — he responded with a statement saying the research raised «many questions with regard to its methodology, the information used and conclusions it reaches.»

During his travels, Wallace had independently reached the same conclusions as Darwin, and in March 1858, he sent Darwin a paper explaining his thinking.

The paper stresses that more research, especially randomized controlled trials with long - term follow - up, would be needed to reach a definite conclusion on the risk of TRT on cardiovascular outcomes.

In a paper submitted to the journal Mind, Bostrom has outlined exactly how he reached this chilling conclusion.

«Both our paper and the Bäckhed paper are essentially reaching the same conclusion that the lack of fiber results in bacteria encroaching into the mucus layer, and those bacteria are promoting low - grade inflammation, contributing to metabolic syndrome,» says Gewirtz.

I've seen articles written about this paper which reach more alarming conclusions.

Patrick Brown's very informative blog post about the paper gives a good idea of how they reached these conclusions.

The authors reached these conclusions after analyzing more than 170 academic papers, and published their results in the journal Psychological Bulletin.

The paper dives into detail, but here are a few of the high - level conclusions the theory allows us to reach about the future of K — 12 education.

The paper apparently reached that conclusion because a White House spokesman cited «positive» developments in Wisconsin prior to President Obama's visit.

In a briefing paper prepared for the National Academy of Education (NAE) and the American Educational Research Association, Linda Darling - Hammond and three other distinguished authors reached the following conclusion: «With respect to value - added measures of student achievement tied to individual teachers, current research suggests that high - stakes, individual - level decisions, as well as comparisons across highly dissimilar schools or student populations should be avoided.»

March 23, 2015 A new research paper reported in Child Trends called, «Preventing Violence: Understanding and Addressing Determinants of Youth Violence in the United States» explores conclusions reached including that schools are an important locus for intervention and that efforts to improve school climate (including developing SEL skills).

Based on the data in the paper and conclusions reached, it seems to be a factual statement that those people that meet the criteria which others have had success discharging their loans will have a better chance of discharging the student loans.

Issue 2) A follow - up paper reached the same conclusions in the Spring 2000 issue.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago recently conducted a study focusing on Lending Club — the largest marketplace lending platform — and reached opposite conclusions from the researchers that authored the Cleveland Fed working paper.

Ah, the faster the papers come, the more they reinforce the conclusion I reached some ten years ago about two years after I started studying energy, collapse and climate: Simplicity.

This seems to have been in line with recent (90's) thinking on the subject, but the 98 and 99 papers were the first attempts to use all the available evidence to reach a conclusion on this subject.

«Indeed controversial» is academic language; but to politicians, this sounds like «praising with faint damnation» — a politician is apt to assume «is indeed controversial» means «is a hot research area» rather than «was asserted in one paper that used at best controversial methods to reach its claimed conclusion» — eh?

Understanding what impact that might have on the paper's conclusions are interesting things to explore in a blog since they rarely reach a level that would necessitate another paper.

The report summary failed to reflect either the tentative nature of the conclusions reached in the white papers or the often strong caveats conveyed by their individual authors.

«Leonardo's conclusions are not only startling, but his paper provides a transparent explanation for how he reaches them — something lacking in many studies,» said Meghan L. O'Sullivan, the Jeane Kirkpatrick Professor of the Practice of International Affairs at the Kennedy School and director of the Geopolitics of Energy Project.

They re-interpret real research papers often reaching conclusions opposite of the paper.

In your paper (co-authored with Wenju Cai) presented to the Pan Evaporation Workshop at the Academy of Science in Canberra in late 2004, which I attended, you used the SRES A2 scenario projections to reach the conclusion that «By 2100, the equivalent CO2 reaches a level that is more than three times the level of 1870 (concentration ppm).»

Clearly, it doesn't affect the conclusions of the paper simply because the conclusions were reached without knowledge of the error.

(Same as Lindzen and Choi paper's conclusion, two papers, second addressing all third party criticism and reaching the same conclusion.)

One bad effect of the timetable approach leads authors to submit papers that are incomplete, just to make the deadline, even to the point of giving a conclusion that represents subordinate parts of the work but deals ineffectively with what might have been a good advance in the main conclusion, had they reached it.

I couldn't write these things more explicitly in the paper because of the refereeing, however, you don't have to be a genius to reach these conclusions from the paper.

Contrast, if you will, the conclusions reached by the Wegman Committee in respect of the MBH98 paper produced by Dr Michael Mann and colleagues, with the conclusions reached by Lord Oxburgh and his panel.

As I recall, they reviewed maybe as many as 200 peer reviewed papers from all over the place, and reached a conclusion that the MWP and the LIA were not «Northern Hemisphere» phenomena, as Michael Mann tried to imply in his hockey stick graph, but were in fact true global events, with evidence for that coming from all over the place.

Using new topographic measurements and computer simulation at Potsdam University's Institute for Climatic Impact Research, the paper's authors, Matthias Mengel and Anders Levermann, have reached alarming conclusions about the effects in - Nature: Climate Change.

I've seen articles written about this paper which reach more alarming conclusions.

While the MBH papers may not use Yamal, some of the other studies which reach the same conclusions (which was what you were talking about) do.

What I find most surprising about the paper on my re-read and those who seem to have little problem accepting or at least finding no weaknesses of the indirect methodology used to make some rather far reaching conclusions is not that papers such as this one can get published, but the authoritative nature these articles seem to take on and particularly so when they are referenced in the IPCC reports.

I read a transcript of an interview with Monnett and also reached the conclusion that fraud was an unlikely issue in the polar bear paper.

I note that on Wattsupia their incisive analysis of this DeFreitas & McLean paper consists of saying that it is a «paper that reaches a similar conclusion» to that of Kosaka & Xie.

Patrick Brown's very informative blog post about the paper gives a good idea of how they reached these conclusions.

The most recent study is the sixth paper this year that reached similar conclusions, Lewandowsky said.

Also, was this the same paper by those authors that reached incorrect conclusions because they mixed up radians and degrees?

There is a large number of peer - reviewed papers, with results from all over the world, reaching precisely the opposite conclusion — that is, that the MWP, and / or the RWP, were warmer than, or as warm as, the present period.

A second questions, which is one I had decided to ask you personally already before the remarkable statement you made to the Guardian is: Do you believe that once a paper is published all the data and methods used in reaching the conclusions stated in the paper should be available for scrutiny by other scientists, or even members of the public?

One important piece of information — in addition to these values above — is that the default figures used to reach the broader conclusions of the paper didn't include benefits to the distribution grid.

both his «CO2 papers» on WUWT are pertinent and worthy of a revisit by all considering the work of Salby... Richard S Courtney says: January 25, 2008 at 8:23 pm Dr Spencer's article reaches similar conclusions to those in Rorsch A, Courtney RS & Thoenes D, «The Interaction of Climate Change and the Carbon Dioxide Cycle» E&E v16no2 (2005).

They reached their conclusion based on a suite of papers, including MBH98.

Let me up - front, I'm not a scientist and freely admit to often having difficulty understanding the technical detail contained in many of the climate science papers that underpin the debate (in those cases I rely on external review and / or the summary conclusions that they reach).

The resulting ECS / TCR ratio gives the «not yet evident» 1.25 x that IPCC can not argue with — their own data, the energy budget method is well established with several, papers since Otto 2013 reaching similar conclusions.