Sentences with phrase «papers under review»

Upon looking at his publications, there are many publications of relevance to topics being discussed at Climate Etc., notably some papers under review.

Editors may have papers under review that rely on a published result; if it's being called into question, editors need to know about it, he adds.

While this could be done using published papers, it is probably more insightful initially to have access to papers under review, where flaws may still be present.

The team that wrote the H5N1 paper under review at Science has grudgingly agreed to do so, says one of its members, virologist Albert Osterhaus of Erasmus MC in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

The goal of the paper under review, as I take it, is an attempt to put an upper bound on the Charney climate sensitivity feedback by considering the LCM paleoclimate.

I am old fashioned enough to believe that along with protecting the editor from publishing garbage, they must act to hone, polish, and correct the paper under review.

It is only when a paper under review has the wrong conclusions (and when despite having given it the thumbs down a journal still thinks they might publish some shocking piece of work) that it becomes necessary to dig a bit deeper and discredit the science fundamentals.

Not exact matches

Reality Google... Book review of secret papers of Pope Benedidt XVI... then click the leaked Vatican doc * uments... you will find a review by John Allan Jr.... under the heading Vatican finances you will see details of how some of the cash comes in... how reliable?

If you are familiar with that journal, you'll know that it publishes thousands of papers each year, under different categories («Letter,» «Report,» «Review»).

I recently reviewed a paper, Field - testing ecological and economic benefits of coffee certification programs, that included a nifty summary table of the criteria used for shade certification by Rainforest Alliance, and Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center (under the «Bird - Friendly» trademark).

Filed Under: A Green Home, Natural Product Reviews Tagged With: Adult Diaper, Cloth Pad, Cloth Pads, Crotch Area, Diva Cup, Easy Solution, Good Options, Landfill, Menstrual Products, Organic Cotton, Panties, Purple Color, Sanitary Napkin, Sanitary Napkins, Soapy Water, Tampons, Time Capsule, Toilet Paper, Undewear, Wash Cloth

Filed Under: Green Cleaning, Natural Product Reviews Tagged With: Baking Soda And Vinegar, Clorox, Conventional Cleaners, Dish Soap, Ditch, Excuse, Few Days, First Steps, Greener Choices, Number 1, Old Job, Paper Towel, Peppermint, Remnants, Roundup, Sake, Spray Bottles, Sustainable Lifestyle, Tv Cameras, Windex

In the meantime, after half a decade, already, of widespread pay freezes and anxiety, and with Labour under Ed Miliband quietly accepting that they will next hold power in hard times too — «There is a new world out there,» the much - tipped young Labour backbencher Stella Creasy recently told this paper, «in the next [government] spending review absolutely everything should be on the table» — the toughening - up of Britain is arguably well underway.

The paper is published in PLOS Biology at a time when experimental processes are under the microscope following increased levels of retractions and some journals are reviewing their peer review procedures.

By the time Mena earned his doctorate in 2007, he already had two peer - reviewed papers in international journals under his belt.

A paper describing those findings is under review, he says.

Kirkland also co-wrote a 2013 paper reviewing research around the health effects of glyphosate, under a contract with the Glyphosate Task Force, an industry - backed group, he says.

Under these circumstances, a lot of competent papers have to be turned away after peer review, even if the flaws identified by the referees are mostly fixable.

Editors from the other 20 had e-mailed the fictitious corresponding authors stating that the paper was still under review; those, too, are excluded from this analysis.

The investigators proceeded to grill Monnett on the methodology and statistics used in the peer - reviewed paper in Polar Biology he co-authored with Jeffrey Gleason (who is not under investigation)-- Monnett countered that the investigators didn't understand fifth - grade math or the peer review process.

As suggested by the title of their review paper, «Brain under stress and Alzheimer's disease,» Mravec et al (3) suggest that the answer to this question is yes.

Before presenting some final thoughts about this paper and the series in general, I wanted to review still another section of the Mravec et al (3) paper that I feel is both so important and so under - appreciated that it will form the basis of my next Moss Nutrition Report series - the gut - brain connection.

Question: On the very first paper you reviewed, the area under curves are not equal.

Filed Under: Beauty, What I'm Buying Tagged With: anastasia beverly hills, bath and body, beauty haul, beauty review, blush, cosmetics, fragrance, hair product, jouer, jouer cosmetics, le matchbox, lilly pulitzer, lilly pulitzer for target, lipstick, makeup, redken, rifle paper, samples, sephora, skincare, stationery, sunscreen, tanning, target, tory burch

Filed Under: Beauty, Uncategorized, What I'm Buying Tagged With: beauty, beauty review, birchbox, Birchbox review, decor, entertaining, greenleaf, home decor, kitchen, online shopping, product review, rifle paper

Stephen Hawking's last paper predicts parallel universes — The paper is archived by Cornell University's Arxiv.org and is under scholarly review... reporting dating back to 1907, today's UPI is a credible source for the most...

Recent updates: Added 1/14: First Showing (additional critic), Slashfilm (additional critic) Added 1/8: Birth.Movies.Death (additional critics), Parallax View, The Tracking Board Added 1/7: Film Journey, The Film Stage (additional critic), First Showing (additional critic) Added 1/5: The Film Stage (additional critics), In Review, Moving Picture Blog, The Playlist (additional critics), Slashfilm (additional critics), Taste of Cinema Added 1/3: CBS News, Den of Geek [UK], Film Pulse, The Film Stage (substituted individual lists for consensus list), Hidden Remote, The Playlist (additional critics), PopCulture.com, Reverse Shot, ScreenAnarchy, Slant (substituted individual lists for consensus list), Slashfilm, Wichita Eagle Added 12/31: artsBHAM, Cape Cod Times, CinemaBlend (additional critics), Collider (additional critics), Criterion [The Daily], Criterion Cast, The Film Stage, First Showing, Flavorwire, The Globe and Mail, The Hollywood Reporter / Heat Vision, Lincoln Journal Star, Monkeys Fighting Robots, NOW Magazine, Omaha World - Herald, Paste, People, ReelViews, Salt Lake City Weekly, San Antonio Current, Screen Daily, SF Weekly, These Violent Delights, Toledo Blade, Uncut, Under the Radar, Vancouver Observer, Vancouver Sun Added 12/29: The Arts Desk, Austin American - Statesman, Austin Chronicle, Awards Daily, Boston Globe, Boston Herald, CinemaBlend (additional critics), Cleveland Scene, Collider (additional critics), The Daily Beast, Deadline, Film Journal International, Houston Chronicle, Ioncinema, Las Vegas Review - Journal, New Orleans Times - Picayune, New York Post, Paper, The Playlist, San Diego City Beat, San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco Examiner, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Salt Lake Tribune, Seattle Weekly, Shepherd Express, The Stranger, Tallahassee Democrat, Toronto Star, Tucson Weekly, Tulsa World, Uproxx, The Virginian - Pilot, Washington City Paper, White City Cinema Added 12/27: Awards Campaign, Baltimore Beat, Buffalo News, Chicago Daily Herald, CinemaBlend, Collider, Film School Rejects, GameSpot, JoBlo, Metro UK, Newsweek, Observer, San Jose Mercury News, Seattle Times, Sydney Morning Herald, Tampa Bay Times, Thrillist, USA Today, Village Voice (Wolfe), Wired UK Added 12/22: Chicago Sun - Times, Den of Geek [US], The Guardian, Mashable, Metro US, Sioux City Journal, Star Tribune, The Verge, Wired Added 12/21: BBC, Chicago Reader, The Commercial Appeal, IGN, Las Vegas Weekly, TimeOut New York, Village Voice Added 12/20: A.V. Club, Crave, Esquire, The Independent, Spectrum Culture Added 12/19: The Atlantic, Birth.Movies.Death., CineVue, Newsday, NPR, WhatCulture Added 12/18: Arizona Republic, Yahoo! Added 12/17: Dazed, Flood Magazine, New Zealand Herald, Salon, ScreenCrush, The Star - Ledger (NJ.com), Time Out London, Total Film Added 12/15: BuzzFeed, Christian Science Monitor, Detroit News, Los Angeles Times, Philadelphia Daily News, Vox Added 12/14: Associated Press, Chicago Tribune, Consequence of Sound, Little White Lies, Los Angeles Daily News, RogerEbert.com, TheWrap Added 12/13: Evening Standard, Variety Added 12/12: The Hollywood Reporter, Huffington Post, PopCrush Added 12/11: CBC, The Observer [UK], Wall Street Journal Added 12/8: The New Yorker, Rolling Stone, Slant Added 12/7: Culture Trip, IMDb, The Ringer, Slate, Time, Us Weekly Added 12/6: Cahiers du Cinéma, New York Times, Vogue, Vulture (Yoshida), Washington Post Added 12/5: Scorecard launched with 15 lists.

The findings are detailed in a paper currently under review for publication.

All papers will be reviewed under the direction of the Scientific Committee.

Ofqual will conduct a review of the rules under which serving teachers take part in writing and reviewing question papers, and the safeguards in place to prevent disclosure of confidential information.

Their first paper from the CPS Principal Leadership Project is currently under review at an education journal.

Anderson, Patricia M., K. F. Butcher, and Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach (Working Paper / In Press / Under Review).

A new strategy paper from the Brookings Institution's Hamilton Project — Reducing chronic absenteeism under the Every Student Succeeds Act — reviews «the literature and present novel analyses of the factors at the school and student levels that relate to chronic absenteeism,» and finds «that health problems and socioeconomic...

The «working paper» (i.e., not peer - reviewed, and in this case not even internally reviewed by those at NBER) analyzed the controversial teacher evaluation system (i.e., IMPACT) that was put into place in DC Public Schools (DCPS) under the then Chancellor, Michelle Rhee.

If these results hold up under scrutiny by other economists (the paper will soon be peer - reviewed), they could prove problematic for school - choice advocates such as U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.

This weekend examiners in Wales are regrading English papers taken under the WJEC examining board, after Welsh Education Minister Leighton Andrews ordered a review of results.

At the Saturday Paper, which publishes reviews under pseudonymous initials, 63 % of reviews were of books by male authors and 37 % female authors.

Filed Under: Reviews, Top News Tagged With: Brian K Vaughan, Cliff Chiang, Emma Rios, Hwei Lim, Mirror, Paper Girls, Reviews

I filed 1/16, was accepted 1/20, on 2/16 I gor my first notice bout being under review (audit), sent papers in 3/2, got 2 notice 3/30 also got a separate noticed same date 3/30 stating if I do nt here from them by 5/15 to call them, & sent in response 4/7, here it is 5/11 and still no money or anything... transcripts say cycle date 20150405 & refund freeze... confused..

In a recently revised working paper, now under review for publication, called «Sizing up Repo,» he and colleagues Arvind Krishnamurthy of Northwestern University, and Dmitry Orlov, a PhD student at Stanford GSB, argue that «the «run on repo» by money market funds and other cash lenders was confined to a small slice of the repo market.»

(A pre-print of the paper, currently under review and under public discussion on Cryolist, is available here.)

However, it is not foolproof — a deeply flawed paper can end up being published under a number of different potential circumstances: (i) the work is submitted to a journal outside the relevant field (e.g. a paper on paleoclimate submitted to a social science journal) where the reviewers are likely to be chosen from a pool of individuals lacking the expertise to properly review the paper, (ii) too few or too unqualified a set of reviewers are chosen by the editor, (iii) the reviewers or editor (or both) have agendas, and overlook flaws that invalidate the paper's conclusions, and (iv) the journal may process and publish so many papers that individual manuscripts occasionally do not get the editorial attention they deserve.

Further details are available in a discussion paper under peer review [Willett et al., submitted].

And may I add looks remarkably similar to the idealized deformation of the polar vortex under scenarios with Arctic warming, low Arctic sea ice and increased Siberian snow cover presented in my recent review paper with Jennifer Francis [of Rutgers University].

My first climate change paper is under review and I am really excited about the data and the story.

It is also important to note that the content of the report — a synthesis of various white papers written about hydraulic fracturing — was not under review for validation or criticism and that the panel «found no evidence of intentional misrepresentation» by the authors.

I wonder if their real interest is the fact that under those trees flourish thousands of cocaine laboratories, their favourite drug they inhale to get the inspiration for new end of the world phantasies or to concoct new scientific «peer reviewed» papers.

****» A university which profits directly from its research unit hires a guy who profits from the work done by the research unit in question to review 11 papers from this unit out of hundreds selected by a group on which sits the people under investigation and limits itself to a review so cursory that it can be summed up in 5 pages, and that is conclusive evidence to you that everything they did was OK.

Review Status: This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Climate of the PastReview Status: This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Climate of the Pastreview for the journal Climate of the Past (CP).

Take up your doubts with NASA and the authors of scientific peer reviewed papers that have identified massive geothermal activity laying under the Ice Sheet.