Are the chapters and
paragraphs in the right order?
Not exact matches
In order to make sure it's a tab, you can click the «show / hide» button, that looks like a backwards «P» with a double vertical bar (it's a
paragraph mark), and tabs will show up as an arrow pointing to the
right.
On the other hand, if national legislation falls within the scope of EU law, the Court, when requested to give a preliminary ruling, must provide all the guidance as to interpretation needed
in order for the national court to determine whether that legislation is compatible with the fundamental
rights the observance of which the Court ensures (see, inter alia, Case C ‑ 617 / 10 Åkerberg Fransson [2013] ECR I ‑ 0000,
paragraph 19 and the case - law cited).
«Does the judgment of the Court of Justice
in Digital
Rights Ireland (including,
in particular,
paragraphs 60 to 62 thereof) lay down mandatory requirements of EU law applicable to a Member State's domestic regime governing access to data retained
in accordance with national legislation,
in order to comply with Articles 7 and 8 of the [Charter]?»
James Sandman: Linda's got it exactly
right and I don't think that when the framers
in the first
paragraph of the Constitution identified their priorities, I don't their
order of listing was an accident.
52 However, the mere fact that it might appear desirable, for economic reasons or
in order to preserve the family unit
in the territory of the Union, for members of a family consisting of third country nationals and a Union citizen who is a minor to be able to reside with that citizen
in the territory of the Union
in the Member State of which he is a national is not sufficient
in itself to support the view that the Union citizen would be forced to leave the territory of the Union if such a
right of residence were not granted (see, to that effect, Dereci and Others,
paragraph 68).
78 The Member States must not only interpret their national law
in a manner consistent with European Union law but also make sure they do not rely on an interpretation of an instrument of secondary legislation which would be
in conflict with the fundamental
rights protected by the legal
order of the European Union (see Parliament v Council,
paragraph 105, and Detiček,
paragraph 34).
46 With respect, finally, to the
right of residence of a person who is a third country national
in the Member State of residence of his minor children, nationals of that Member State, who are dependant on him and of whom he and his spouse have joint custody, the Court has held that the refusal to grant a
right of residence would have the consequence that those children, who are citizens of the Union, would have to leave the territory of the Union
in order to accompany their parents, and that those citizens of the Union would,
in fact, be unable to exercise the substance of the
rights conferred by their status (Ruiz Zambrano,
paragraphs 43 and 44).
Helena, MT — A federal court today issued an
Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Injunction, effectively gutting paragraph 1 of a recently issued administrative order against juror rights educators sharing information at the Lindsey - Flanigan Courthouse Plaza in Denver, Colo
Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Injunction, effectively gutting
paragraph 1 of a recently issued administrative
order against juror rights educators sharing information at the Lindsey - Flanigan Courthouse Plaza in Denver, Colo
order against juror
rights educators sharing information at the Lindsey - Flanigan Courthouse Plaza
in Denver, Colorado.
An employer does not want to read multiple
paragraphs about your experience, but rather skim your resume
in order to determine
in a matter of minutes whether or not you are the
right person to consider and call
in for an interview.
Justice North made the Federal Court's
order on the determination saying (
in paragraphs 5, 8 and 9) that the native title
rights and interests of the Gunditjmara people consists of: