Rather, they tested a range of potential values for
key parameters of their model and retained those consistent with the paleo - sea level estimates, but they did not explore the full space of possible values within their ranges.
Synthetic images show that the pattern observed around $ \ zeta ^ 2 $ Ret can be produced by an eccentric disk seen close to edge - on, and allow us to bring additional constraints on the
disk parameters of our model (disk flux, extent).
In addition to perturbations for internal
physics parameters of the model and initial condition, this experiment requires a large number of forcing perturbations to deal with the large uncertainty in the historical forcings.
Rather, they tested a range of potential values for
key parameters of their model and retained those consistent with the paleo - sea level estimates, but they did not explore the full space of possible values within their ranges.
Van der Vlugt describes how this works: «You let a computer program test all possible values of
each parameter of your model.
After that we calibrated
the parameters of the models and we obtained each issuer's CDS rates.
Fundamental uncertainties arise from insufficient observational evidence, disagreements over how to interpret data, and how to set
the parameters of models.
Climate scientists disagree because of fundamental uncertainties arise from insufficient observational evidence, disagreements over how to interpret data, and how to set
the parameters of models.»
You can refine this kind of model ad infinitum by adding and tweaking vessels, valves and pump etc... i.c.
the parameters of the model to fit historical data or to try and make a guess at what the future will be.