Even if the alleging
parent meets their burden of proof, the parent with blindness can show that the use of supportive parenting services will alleviate any dangers to the child.
Not exact matches
Within the past week the South Carolina Court
of Appeals has issued two unpublished opinions reversing two family court decisions to terminate a
parent's parental rights on the basis that the Department
of Social Services (DSS) failed to
meet its
burden of proof.
If the
burden of proof established in paragraph IV is
met, the
burden shifts to the non-custodial
parent to prove, by a preponderance
of the evidence, that the proposed relocation is not in the best interest
of the child.
If the
burden of proof established in paragraph IV is
met, the
burden shifts to the non-custodial
parent to prove, by a preponderance
of the evidence, that the proposed relocation is not in the best interest
of the child.
If the mother
meets the
burden of proof required by law, the opposing
parent must show that the move does not reflect the child's best interests.