Sentences with phrase «parent opposing the move»

It follows that the reasons for one of the joint custodial parents wanting to move, or the reason for the other joint custodial parent opposing the move, would be very relevant to determining whether the children's needs can be met by only one of the parents.

Whether you are the parent wishing to make the move or the parent opposing the move, early legal advice is essential.

Parents planning a move are generally confident their reasons are good ones; parents opposing a move are usually equally certain they are not.

(Under the earlier approach of Colorado case law, the parent seeking to relocate was required to show a sensible reason for the move, but then the burden of proof shifted to the parent opposing the move.)

The parent opposing the move has to put some credible evidence in front of the judge which shows that the proposed move is not in good faith, or that the move is against the best interests of the children.

It should be stressed that if the parent opposing the move fails to place sufficient evidence in front of the judge to warrant a hearing, the move will be approved without a full - blown Baures hearing.

If the parent opposing the move has put sufficient evidence in front of the the judge a hearing will be scheduled at which the following 12 factors will be analyzed.

Not exact matches

One signer is quoted on the petition as saying, «I am so opposed to this move that I will most definitely pull my daughter from the school if they do move to Olympic or if any other decision like this is made without parent input or timely warning.»

Parents and others who opposed the move gained a school board majority in the May 2017 elections and tried to reverse the shift in July.

But the move has been opposed by teachers» unions, including the NUT and the ATL, who have organised protests on Wednesday for teachers and parents.

The move follows years of pressure from teachers, parents and educationalists opposed to putting young pupils through high stakes national Sats tests.

The move was opposed by the local MP and some parents.

In an unexpected move, Democrats have revised the K - 12 education section of their party's 2016 platform in important ways, backing the right of parents to opt their children out of high - stakes standardized tests, qualifying support for charter schools, and opposing using test scores for high - stakes purposes to evaluate teachers and students.

During the course of the discussion, the Hartford Board of Education chairman read letters from Clark Parents in favor of the move to give Friendship their school but failed to read letters from parents who opposed the give - a-way pParents in favor of the move to give Friendship their school but failed to read letters from parents who opposed the give - a-way pparents who opposed the give - a-way program.

Whether you are a parent looking to relocate your child to another city or state, or you oppose the intended relocation of your child, it is essential that you contact a seasoned, knowledgeable Los Angeles move - away attorney immediately to ensure all necessary issues are addressed, and to bring you the best possible outcome for your case.

Whether you are seeking to move out of the area with your child or are a parent who opposes such a move, it is important to ensure the protection of your parental rights.

The factors to be considered include: each parent's reasons for seeking or opposing the move, the quality of the relationships between the child and the custodial and noncustodial parents, the impact of the move on the quantity and quality of the child's future contact with the noncustodial parent, the degree to which the custodial parent's and child's life may be enhanced economically, emotionally and educationally by the move, and the feasibility of preserving the relationship between the noncustodial parent and child through suitable visitation arrangements.

Curiously, the FLA does not also require the court to consider the other parent's reasons for opposing the move.»

If the moving parent wants to relocate with the child and the other parent opposes the petition to do so, the court must decide whether to allow the child's relocation.

These factors include the reason for the move, any reasons the non-custodial parent opposes relocation, and the effect relocation will have on visitation.

If the other parent opposes the child's move and court approval is required, the parent who wishes to change the child's residence must file a motion with the Michigan state courts.

In practice, in order to oppose relocation, the noncustodial parent must demonstrate that the move is not in good faith and not in the best interest of the child.

What is the past history of dealings between both parents in regard to the reasons put forward by each for either supporting or opposing the move?

If a parent plans to relocate with the child, both parents should understand the steps for requesting and opposing a potential move.

In general, the mother requesting to move has the burden of proof if the other parent opposes the relocation.

If the mother meets the burden of proof required by law, the opposing parent must show that the move does not reflect the child's best interests.

These factors are: (1) the potential advantages of the proposed move and likelihood the relocation will substantially improve the life of the custodial parent and child as well as whether the move is the result of a momentary whim by the custodial parent; (2) the integrity of both parents» motives - for the move and opposing the move; and (3) whether there are alternative custody or visitation arrangements that can be made that will foster an ongoing relationship between the child and noncustodial parent.

Additionally, our Supreme Court noted Pennsylvania courts require the following considerations in relocation cases: (1) the economic and other potential advantages of the move; (2) the likelihood the move would substantially improve the quality of life for the custodial parent and the children and is not the result of a whim of the custodial parent; (3) the motives behind the parent's reasons for seeking or opposing the move; and (4) the availability of a realistic substitute visitation arrangement that will adequately foster an ongoing relationship between the non-custodial parent and the children.

If the parent seeking to relocate can satisfy the court that their move is in good faith, and that the move is not against their child's best interests, the burden of proof to halt the move swings to the parent who is opposing the move.

For example, our Supreme Court stated the New York Court of Appeals looks at (1) each parent's reason for seeking or opposing the relocation; (2) the relationship between the children and each parent; (3) the impact of the relocation on the quality of the children's future contact with the non-custodial parent; (4) the economic, emotional, and educational enhancements of the move; and (5) the feasibility of preserving the children's relationship with the non-custodial parent through visitation arrangements.