Sentences with phrase «parental education status»

These risk factors include, living in poverty, being a single or teen - age parent, low parental education status, illiteracy / limited literacy, and families who are challenged by language barriers (e.g., immigrant families).

The researchers accounted for differences in age, sex, parental education status and race.

Not exact matches

The interview format used by the Oliner team had over 450 items and consisted of six main parts: a) characteristics of the family household in which respondents lived in their early years, including relationships among family members; b) parental education, occupation, politics, and religiosity, as well as parental values, attitudes, and disciplinary approaches; c) respondent's childhood and adolescent years - education, religiosity, and friendship patterns, as well as self - described personality characteristics; d) the five - year period just prior to the war — marital status, occupation, work colleagues, politics, religiosity, sense of community, and psychological closeness to various groups of people; if married, similar questions were asked about the spouse; e) the immediate prewar and war years, including employment, attitudes toward Nazis, whether Jews lived in the neighborhood, and awareness of Nazi intentions toward Jews; all were asked to describe their wartime lives and activities, whom they helped, and organizations they belonged to; f) the years after the war, including the present — relations with children and personal and community — helping activities in the last year; this section included forty - two personality items comprising four psychological scales.

There's nationality, race, gender, ethnicity, religious affiliation, religious background, sexual orientation, physical abilities, physical traits, age, education, job, socioeconomic status, primary relationship status, parental status, taste, value systems, political views, length of time in the community and accent.

Thus, by abandoning the man - woman distinction in favor of the heterosexual - homosexual distinction, homosexual activists demand not parenthood (paternity or maternity), but the right to some new abstract parental status that reduces the role of the «parent» to the exercise of certain functions such as education.

Although parental education, income and social status are known to increase children's IQs, the researchers found that breastfeeding increased intelligence levels even after these factors and 10 others were controlled for statistically.

Estimates are adjusted for child age, sex, fetal growth, gestational age, race / ethnicity, and primary language and for maternal age, parity, smoking status, IQ, depression, employment, and child care at 6 months» post partum, as well as for parental education level, annual household income, and Home Observation Measurement of the Environment short form score.

Demographic differences across families that can bias studies in favor of breast - feeding include parental race, age, marital status, family income, insurance coverage, the mother's education and employment, and whether a woman smokes or drinks during pregnancy.

They measured total socioeconomic adversity by weighing factors such as average parental education, family economic hardship, family make - up and employment status.

Biological factors such as maternal nutritional status during pregnancy, low infant birth weight, premature birth, poor infant physical growth and nutritional status at follow - up were not as strongly linked to cognitive ability as the socio - environmental factors assessed during the study: home environment, maternal depression, parental education and socio - economic status.

In essence, Secretary Duncan dismissed parental opposition as the byproduct of self - interested parents who were more concerned about solidifying their social status than with the quality of education their children received.

If we look at a different marker of socioeconomic status, parental education levels, we find a similar pattern.

The author adds, «School practices to encourage parents to participate in their children's education are more important than family characteristics like parental education, family size, marital status, socioeconomic level, or student grade level in determining whether parents get involved.»

Dozens of studies point to one important conclusion: What the family does is more important than family background (income, parental education, marital status, family size, etc.).

These indicate how well a teacher's students did relative to other teachers» students, controlling for prior student achievement and for student and family background characteristics (for example, age, race and ethnicity, disability, free or reduced - price lunch status, and parental education level).

Student and family background characteristics used in the analysis include a student's gender, immigration status, exposure to early childhood education, the number of books in the home, and parental occupation and work status.

The Free and Reduced Price lunch definition has become fairly sketchy, so in the below comparisons I will make use of parental education as a proxy for socio - economic status.

These approaches include using students» socioeconomic status, parental education levels, the socioeconomic status of neighborhoods, and the composition of an area's housing including its share of subsidized or rental housing.

Diversity is defined broadly, embracing race, color, gender, age, language, physical characteristics, disability, economic status, parental status, education, geographic origin, profession, lifestyle, religion, and position in the school hierarchy.

Results are provided for groups of students defined by shared characteristics — race or ethnicity, gender, eligibility for free / reduced - price school lunch, highest level of parental education, type of school, charter school, type of school location, region of the country, status as students with disabilities, and status as students identified as English language learners.

Kevin J.A. Thomas, Pennsylvania State University, «Parental Education — Occupation Mismatch Status and Child Poverty in Black Immigrant Families»

It found that one - third of the variance of SAT scores could be explained by parental education, socio - economic status or status as a member of an underrepresented minority.

Even more stunning is that while in 1994, parental education was the strongest predictor of SAT scores, in the last four years of the study, status as a member of an underrepresented minority overtook both parental education and socio - economic status as the strongest predictor of SAT scores.

This includes things like your target clients» age range, gender, location, education level, parental status, marital status, or similar descriptions as relevant.

An author of books for young adults points to research showing that strong school library programs led by a certified school librarian help ALL students do better in school, including students whose parents can't afford to provide all the resources kids need to do well in school: «[Research] tells us that even after adjusting for factors such as parental education, father's occupation, and social class, the impact of having books available in the home is as strong a predictor of school success as socioeconomic status.»

We wanted to make sure that the lack of association between divorce and improved well - being for unhappily married adults was not an artifact of differences in age, race, education, income, or parental status.

Bullying behavior has been shown to vary with the child's race, age, and sex, 7,8,32 as has the amount and type of television viewing.35, 36 The association between bullying and socioeconomic status, including parental income and education, has not been explicitly explored, but socioeconomic status has been shown to be strongly associated with externalizing behavior generally.28 Socioeconomic status is also known to influence both television viewing and parenting style.22, 36 Model covariates therefore included the child's sex; race (Hispanic, African American, or non - Hispanic / non — African American); the child's age when the bullying question was asked in 2000; and the parents» income and educational levels.

Data on each child's age, sex, racial / ethnic background, health status, history of own and parental use of mental health services, parental marital status, parental education, and use of Medicaid insurance were recorded on the clinician visit questionnaire.

A number of factors have been associated with poor school attendance, including low socioeconomic status and low levels of parental education.1 3 In Australia, Indigenous young people have been identified to have significantly worse attendance and school retention when compared with non-Indigenous children, and it has been suggested that this is a key driver of the gap in academic outcomes between non-Indigenous and Indigenous young people.6 — 8 In addition Moore and McArthur9 identified that maternal and family risks, such as family instability, mental illness and drug and alcohol issues, are associated with reduced child participation in school.

After controlling for age, gender, race, marital status, education, lifetime depression, parental depression, income and lifetime alcohol use disorder, researchers determined that parental divorce increased the likelihood of suicide attempt by 14 percent.

Information gathered included child sex, race and ethnicity, maternal education, family history of mental illness or treatment, family income, insurance status, and household structure, including parental marital status, number of children, and total number of individuals living in the home.

97 Longitudinal research has linked heavy exposure to television violence in childhood to increased social aggression in adult females, even after controlling for childhood aggression, childhood IQ, parental education, parental TV habits, and the socioeconomic status of the family.98 Although these studies are suggestive, it will not be possible to draw conclusions about whether media violence causes this alternative form of childhood aggression until more research is conducted.

The groups did not differ on residential stability as measured by mean number of years living in Seattle by age 12 years and by the mean number of residences in which participants lived from age 5 to 14 years; socioeconomic status, as measured by years of parental education or proportion eligible for the school lunch program; proportion from single - parent families; proportion of boys; or proportion of whites or nonwhites.

A handful of child outcome studies have attempted to distinguish the effect of family income from the effects of other aspects of family life, such as parental education, that may differ between poor and non-poor families.2 - 3, 8, 11 - 13 Overall, statistical controls for correlated aspects of family socioeconomic status produce either very small or no significant net associations between family income and children's behavioural problems.

distinguishing family income from other aspects of a family's socioeconomic status, such as parental education;

The survey included demographic information (living arrangements, ethnicity indicators, and indicators of SES such as parental education and employment status and locality); access to facilities; and family and peer support (travel, encouragement, watching, praise, joint participation).

Parents answered questions about sociodemographic factors including child sex, age, ethnicity, birth order, maternal age, parental education, marital status, before - tax household income, and numbers of adults and children in the home.

Associations were tested with inattentive and reckless driving behaviors in the subsequent survey — controlling for baseline age, sex, socioeconomic status, parental education, school performance, extracurricular activities, daily television and video / computer game exposure, number of movies watched per week, self - regulation and sensation seeking.

Incorporates legal parental rights and responsibilities to make important decisions regarding issues of health, education, general welfare and religion affecting the child (ren), as well as, sharing a dual residency status of living with both parents.

Our GUS finding for family socio - economic disadvantage (as indicated here by lower parental education) ties in with the negative effect of low family socio - economic status on the quality of both mothers» and fathers» relations with three year - old children in another large birth cohort, the UK Millennium Cohort Study (Malmberg & Flouri, 2011).

Parents reported demographic information including child age, child gender, parental marital status, parental education, and family income.

At screening, parents completed a questionnaire to gather demographic information, including parental education and employment, which were coded for socioeconomic status (Hollingshead, 1975).

Race / Ethnicity Caucasian Hispanic African American Asian American Native American Other races not listed N / A Socioeconomic status < $ 10,000 $ 10,000 - $ 20,000 $ 20,000 - $ 30,000 $ 30,000 - $ 40,000 $ 40,000 - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 - $ 60,000 $ 60,000 - $ 70,000 > $ 70,000 Education level High school diploma Vocational training Some college Bachelor's degree Graduate / professional training Doctoral degree Marital status Measures The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study Questionnaire (ACEs Questionnaire; Felitti et al., 1998) assessed mothers» exposure to seven dimensions of ACEs, including psychological, physical, and sexual abuse and exposure to parental substance abuse, mental illness, domestic violence, and criminal behavior.

The following sociodemographic characteristics will be considered to be potential confounding factors on the basis of their potential associations with parental stress and child health: household income, children's age and gender, and parental age and gender, education level, occupation, marital status and immigration status.

For example, compared to older mothers, teen mothers display lower levels of verbal stimulation and involvement, higher levels of intrusiveness, and maternal speech that is less varied and complex.47, 48 Mothers with fewer years of education read to their children less frequently25, 49 and demonstrate less sophisticated language and literacy skills themselves, 50 which affects the quantity and quality of their verbal interactions with their children.2 Parental education, in turn, relates to household income: poverty and persistent poverty are strongly associated with less stimulating home environments, 51 and parents living in poverty have children who are at risk for cognitive, academic, and social - emotional difficulties.52, 53 Finally, Hispanic and African American mothers are, on average, less likely to read to their children than White, non-Hispanic mothers; 54 and Spanish - speaking Hispanic families have fewer children's books available in the home as compared to their non-Hispanic counterparts.25 These racial and ethnic findings are likely explained by differences in family resources across groups, as minority status is often associated with various social - demographic risks.

Participating schools were sent questionnaire packs to distribute to the parents of children aged 5 — 9 years, including a diagnosis survey; information about behaviour or developmental concerns raised by teachers or professionals; the Childhood Autism Spectrum Test (CAST) plus questions about parental education and socioeconomic status.

No significant differences between participants who completed all interviews and those not present for at least one assessment were found for minority status (minority vs. majority), Χ 2 [1, N = 386] = 0.72, p = 0.40, φ = 0.04), gender, Χ 2 [1, N = 387] = 1.26, p = 0.26, φ = 0.06, age, F [1, 386] = 0.04, p = 0.84, d = 0.03, parental education (some high school or high school graduate, technical school or some college, college degree or beyond), Χ 2 [2, N = 387] = 1.19, p = 0.55, φ = 0.05, marital status (caregiver married vs. not married), Χ 2 [1, N = 387] = 2.48, p = 0.12, φ = 0.08, family income, F [1, 361] = 1.29, p = 0.26, d = 0.18, lifetime alcohol, Χ 2 [1, N = 387] = 1.82, p = 0.18, φ = 0.07 or cigarette use Χ 2 [1, N = 387] = 0.35, p = 0.55, φ = 0.03, internalizing problems, F [1, 386] = 2.67, p = 0.10, d = 0.24, or externalizing problems, F [1, 386] = 3.74, p = 0.05, d = 0.27.

To their credit, Tschann and colleagues controlled for some important factors related to socioeconomic status (SES) and child characteristics (child's gender, hours worked weekly by mother, and two vs. single - parent households) but did not include other important indicators of SES such as parental age or education.

Parental status effects are not modified by age, marital status, and education.

The sociodemographic characteristics of the families in terms of parental education, high school dropout, family poverty, welfare status, age at parenthood, and socioeconomic status indicated an average level of disadvantage relative to the overall Canadian and Quebec populations, respectively (Statistics Canada, 2008, 2012a).