Sentences with phrase «parental feeding practices»

Second, it examines the associations with parental feeding practices, measured with the Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ).

The overall aim of this study was to present a comprehensive model of associations between parental perceptions of child eating behaviors among preschoolers and parental feeding practices, adjusting for potentially important predictors.

This study aims to examine associations between parental perceptions of preschoolers» eating behaviors and parental feeding practices.

Parental confidence in handling child eating behaviors related to obesity [64, 65] was used as a predictor of parental feeding practices in the model.

However, links between children's eating behaviors and parental feeding practices and concerns have yet to be established.

Links between child eating behavior and parental feeding practices, therefore, have been the focus of several research studies [1, 8 — 10]; however, the clinical implications of these links remain unclear.

Previous attempts to create and validate self - report measures of parental feeding practices have provided a good start to the measurement of this important parental behavior.

Parental response to hunger / satiety clues is assessed with the Infant Feeding Style Questionnaire: Satiety subscale, 165 designed to assess parental feeding practices.

For an excellent review of parental feeding practices and their relationship to child overeating and overweight, see Faith, Scanlon, Birch, Francis, & Sherry (2004).

One measurement approach for examining parental feeding practices has been behavioral observations of parent — child interactions during mealtime (Drucker, Hammer, Agras, & Bryson, 1999; Iannotti, O'Brien, & Spillman, 1994; Klesges et al., 1983; Koivisto, Fellenius, & Sjoden, 1994; McKenzie et al., 1991; Orrell - Valente, Hill, Brechwald, Dodge, Pettit, & Bates, 2007).

A small number of studies have examined the longitudinal impact of parental feeding practices on child eating behaviour and weight.

The development of a comprehensive, valid and reliable tool to measure parental feeding practices opens up many possible research directions.

This brief review of relationships between parental feeding practices, child eating behaviour and child BMI has highlighted the need for more prospective research in this area.

Differences may be physiological (e.g., metabolism), behavioural (e.g. responsiveness to food) or environmental (e.g., parental feeding practices).

The parental feeding practice that is most often examined is parental use of restriction or control of the child's food intake (Faith et al., 2003; Fisher & Birch, 1999; Robinson, Kiernan, Matheson, & Haydel, 2001).

Not exact matches

API organizes sensitive responsiveness parenting practices into eight principal areas: preparing for pregnancy, childbirth and parenting; feeding; responding; touch; sleep; caregiving environment; discipline; and parental balance.

Other feeding practices, such as using food as a reward, parental monitoring of children's food consumption, teaching children about healthy eating, parental modeling of healthy habits, or allowing children control over feeding have been less studied, but may be important in the parent — child feeding relationship.

Additionally, parental responses were coded to ascertain the extent to which parents spontaneously named the existing CFPQ factors allowing for better understanding of the centrality of these feeding practices in the minds of parents.

In the second study, open - ended questions solicited feeding practices from parents to develop a more comprehensive measure of parental feeding.

Parental use of restrictive feeding practices and child BMI z - score.

This parent - report measure consists of five subscales that tap parental control practices and attitudes in child feeding.87 In this study, we use the satiety subscale.

For example, parental modeling of healthy foods is an effective feeding practice (Hendy & Raudenbush, 2000; Lee & Birch, 2002), yet this construct is not incorporated into previous self - report measures of parental feeding.

The role of child temperament in parental child feeding practices and attitudes using a sibling design.

API organizes sensitive responsiveness parenting practices into eight principal areas: preparing for pregnancy, childbirth and parenting; feeding; responding; touch; sleep; caregiving environment; discipline; and parental balance.

Currently, in the parental feeding literature, the construct of restriction is thought to represent a variety of practices used to limit children's intake of foods, including controlling the type and quantity of foods that children are offered, when these foods are offered, etc (2, 3).

In addition, several studies have examined parental cognitions, such as concern for child weight, as mediators for feeding practices (e.g., restrictive or pressuring feeding practices increase only when parents become concerned about their children's weights)[38, 42 — 44].

Together, the findings suggest that parental perception of children's small appetites is closely associated to the use of pressure to eat, while parental concern about children's overweight is closely associated with restrictive feeding practices.

High levels of parental restrictive feeding practices can be counterproductive.

In this sample, Concern was not only strongly associated with a parent's perceptions of the child's high level of Food approach, but also mediated most of the association between children's Food approach and parental restrictive feeding practices.

Differences in the extent and expression of parental concern may reflect cultural background, child and parental gender, age and socio - economic status; the same factors may influence the use of restrictive, monitoring, or pressuring feeding practices [54 — 60].