Sentences with phrase «parental responsibility for a child as»

Note: The presumption provided for in this subsection is a presumption that relates solely to the allocation of parental responsibility for a child as defined in section 61B.

In many jurisdictions, a mother has parental responsibility for a child as soon as he is born.

Not exact matches

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackChildren Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

Having Parental Responsibility doesn't make you liable for paying child support: if you are recognised as the biological father, you will have to pay child support — whether or not you have Parental Responsibility.

You will need to have Parental Responsibility in order for the court to recognise you as the child's father, and they'll have to do this before you can be involved in court decisions about their future, such as which school they go to, which country they live in, what their surname is etc..

This satisfied Governor Wilson's desire to promote parental responsibility by sending home test scores for each child as soon as possible, but the Stanford 9 rapidly became the tail that wagged the accountability dog.

As a component of the school - level parental involvement policy mandated by federal law Title I, each school served under this part shall jointly develop with parents for all children served under this part a school - parent compact that outlines how parents, the entire school staff, and students will share the responsibility for improved student achievement and the means by which the school and parents will build and develop a partnership to help children achieve the State's high standards.

As a result, parents» rights and responsibilities are again in the forefront as a necessary ingredient for appropriate and individualized educational programming, mandating that schools provide an opportunity for active parental participation in decisions about the education of childreAs a result, parents» rights and responsibilities are again in the forefront as a necessary ingredient for appropriate and individualized educational programming, mandating that schools provide an opportunity for active parental participation in decisions about the education of childreas a necessary ingredient for appropriate and individualized educational programming, mandating that schools provide an opportunity for active parental participation in decisions about the education of children.

Provocative and unsettling, The Dinner explores parental responsibility for their children's behavior, as well as the extreme lengths a parent would go to protect his or her child.

The full title, the Convention of 19th October 1996 on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children, repeats the titles of the four principal chapters of the Convention so as to «not lend itself to any confusion» (Lagarde).

Although no federal laws specifically address custody, parental responsibility, visitation or time - sharing issues in military divorces, these issues are often made more challenging because service members» obligations to their jobs require extra flexibility and creativity in creating parenting plans and time - sharing arrangements that will work for both parents as well as serve the best interests of the children.

Lindsay also advises clients regarding private law proceedings including Parental Responsibility, Child Arrangements, Prohibited Steps and Specific Issue Orders as well as applications for Leave to Remove from the jurisdiction.

If, following your death, the child has a surviving parent who has parental responsibility, the appointment of your chosen guardian will not take effect for as long as there is a surviving parent.

Provided that you have parental responsibility for the child, you can name a guardian for them in your Will (you can in fact appoint a guardian without using a Will, but most parents use their Will as they intend for the appointment to take place on their death).

Any holder of parental responsibility may submit, to the central authority of the Member State of his or her habitual residence or to the central authority of the Member State where the child is habitually resident or present, a request for assistance as mentioned in Article 55.

If you are concerned that the other parent may try to abduct your child or permanently remove him / her from the UK, we can apply to the court for a Prohibited Steps order, a Residence order and / or a Parental Responsibility order as is most appropriate to your case.

The expression is «clearly capable» of covering a child such as Susana for whom the EU citizen has parental responsibility pursuant to law of the child's country of origin.

I. New proposed parental leave (EI) benefit As anticipated, the budget introduced a new «Use it or Lose it» Employment Insurance (EI) Parental Sharing Benefit for new dads (or the second parent) to take parental leave and share the responsibilities of raising their younparental leave (EI) benefit As anticipated, the budget introduced a new «Use it or Lose it» Employment Insurance (EI) Parental Sharing Benefit for new dads (or the second parent) to take parental leave and share the responsibilities of raising their younParental Sharing Benefit for new dads (or the second parent) to take parental leave and share the responsibilities of raising their younparental leave and share the responsibilities of raising their young child.

In this aspect women in particular (thanks to Gardners sterotyping) are told to leave their abusers and are supported therein, but as soon as it happens and they are fighting for sole parental responsibilities to protect their child from exploitation and as a proxy for continued abuse, they are labeled «mother gaters» or alienators.

To reach this decision, the court will evaluate several factors outlined in state law, such as each parent's ability to provide adequate care for the child, quality of each parent - child relationship, and each parent's willingness to engage in parental responsibilities and not intrude upon the other parent's relationship with the child.

In Massachusetts, the Child Support Guidelines are intended to encourage joint parental responsibility for child support in proportion to income, also taking into consideration other monetary and non-monetary contributions as well as the availability and cost of health insurance coverage for the cChild Support Guidelines are intended to encourage joint parental responsibility for child support in proportion to income, also taking into consideration other monetary and non-monetary contributions as well as the availability and cost of health insurance coverage for the cchild support in proportion to income, also taking into consideration other monetary and non-monetary contributions as well as the availability and cost of health insurance coverage for the childchild.

The situation is more mixed where ECEC for children under 3 years is concerned: many governments generously subsidise and support parents to access child care, but others see child care as primarily a parental responsibility.

If the court determines that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child, it may order sole parental responsibility and make such arrangements for time - sharing as specified in the parenting plan as will best protect the child or abused spouse from further harm.

Parental custody, sometimes referred to as legal custody, is a term used in deciding or establishing who has the responsibility for making important decisions governing the health and well - being of a child under the legal age of adulthood.

You can use this as evidence if you're applying for legal aid to stop an abusive partner seeing your child or to take away their parental responsibility.

(i) if they are to share parental responsibility for the child under the plan — provisions of the kind referred to in paragraph 63C (2)(d)(which deals with the form of consultations between the parties to the plan) as a way of avoiding future conflicts over, or misunderstandings about, the matters covered by that paragraph; and

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thCHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with the mother

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Best interests — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility and for the child to live with them — Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the arrangement if the court ordered for the child to spend no time with applicant father — Where the court has a statutory mandate to make parenting orders with the child's best interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both parents — Where the child's clear views that he does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practical.

In some families accomplishing basic instrumental tasks like the provision of food and shelter may be difficult; other families may accomplish instrumental tasks but may have problems with developmental tasks (for example, those surrounding the departure of the last child from home); other families may have coped resiliently with basic and developmental tasks, only to be knocked sideways by a hazardous event, such as major parental illness or redundancy, or sudden care - giving responsibility for an extended family member.

For example, Prof. Kruk has written: «Child Custody, Access and Parental Responsibility: The Search for a Just and Equitable Standard» where he persuasively and cogently lays out the arguments for equal shared parenting as only an accomplished academic cFor example, Prof. Kruk has written: «Child Custody, Access and Parental Responsibility: The Search for a Just and Equitable Standard» where he persuasively and cogently lays out the arguments for equal shared parenting as only an accomplished academic cfor a Just and Equitable Standard» where he persuasively and cogently lays out the arguments for equal shared parenting as only an accomplished academic cfor equal shared parenting as only an accomplished academic can.

The plan should detail such things as the time - sharing schedule, including holidays, vacations and special occasions, transportation routine, communication between children and parents, how decisions will be made and disagreements handled, and parental responsibility for healthcare, daily tasks, extracurricular activities and school functions.

(1) If a supplemental petition or a motion for modification of time - sharing and parental responsibility is filed because a parent is activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service and the parent's ability to comply with time - sharing is materially affected as a result, the court may not issue an order or modify or amend a previous judgment or order that changes time - sharing as it existed on the date the parent was activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service, except that a court may enter a temporary order to modify or amend time - sharing if there is clear and convincing evidence that the temporary modification or amendment is in the best interests of the child.

As a carer, you have responsibility for making day - to - day decisions about children or young people in your care, and you may also be delegated aspects of parental responsibility.

The trial court... found that it was in the best interest of the child for the parties to be awarded shared parental responsibility with the Father as the primary residential parent.

«The trial court in Wade concluded that there were substantial and material changes in circumstances, and its findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence, including: evidence of parental alienation of the Father by the Mother; failure of the Mother to cooperate with the parenting coordinator and comply with the parenting agreement; violation of shared parental responsibility as evidenced by the Mother's unilateral change of the child's elementary school and her unilateral change of the child's therapist; and the finding that the Mother was in contempt of court for her actions relative to visitation.

(c) subject to any order of a court for the time being in force, a person who has parental responsibility for a child because of the operation of this Act or another Australian law and is responsible for the day ‑ to ‑ day or long ‑ term care, welfare and development of the child should be regarded as having rights of custody in respect of the child; and

(a) each of the parents of a child should be regarded as having rights of custody in respect of the child unless the parent has no parental responsibility for the child because of any order of a court for the time being in force; and

There is consensus that «shared parenting» be defined as encompassing both shared parental authority (decision - making) and shared parental responsibility for the day - to - day upbringing and welfare of children, between fathers and mothers, in keeping with children's age and stage of development.

(3) The provisions mentioned in subsection (2) only have effect as mentioned in that subsection so far as they make provision with respect to the parental responsibility of the parties to a marriage for a child of the marriage, including (but not being limited to):

Any person who gets an interim Child Arrangements Order (saying who the child should live with) has parental responsibility for that child for as long as the order lChild Arrangements Order (saying who the child should live with) has parental responsibility for that child for as long as the order lchild should live with) has parental responsibility for that child for as long as the order lchild for as long as the order lasts.

«Shared parenting — being defined as encompassing both shared parental authority and shared parental responsibility with a minimum of one - third time with each parent, including weekday time — is a viable post-divorce parenting arrangement for the majority of children of divorce, and in their best interests.

This order gives «parental responsibility» to the person who the order says the child will live with (if they don't already have it) for as long as the order is in force.

As shared parenting encompasses both shared parental authority (decision - making) and shared parental responsibility for the day - to - day upbringing and welfare of children, between fathers and mothers, in keeping with children's age and stage of development, there is consensus that legal implementation of shared parenting, including both the assumption of shared responsibilities and presumption of shared rights in regard to the parenting of children by fathers and mothers who are living together or apart, be enshrined in law.

This document sets forth the allocation of Parental Rights and Responsibilities for such issues as who will be responsible for the significant decision - making for the children, and what specific parenting time (both routine and holiday) will be enjoyed by each parent.

From a socio - cultural viewpoint, cognitively responsive behaviours (e.g. maintaining versus redirecting interests, rich verbal input) are thought to facilitate higher levels of learning because they provide a structure or scaffold for the young child's immature skills, such as developing attentional and cognitive capacities.9 Responsive behaviours in this framework promote joint engagement and reciprocity in the parent - child interaction and help a child learn to assume a more active and ultimately independent role in the learning process.10 Responsive support for the child to become actively engaged in solving problems is often referred to as parental scaffolding, and is also thought to be key for facilitating children's development of self - regulation and executive function skills, behaviours that allow the child to ultimately assume responsibility for their well - being.11, 12

Pushing for «child support» post-divorce as «parental responsibility» appealed to feminists for several reasons.

If a parent is granted «sole» parental rights and responsibilities, she is responsible for providing a home for the child and making decisions concerning his welfare, such as decisions about education, health and religion.

Where the local authority places the child with a relative or connected person, they are referred to as a looked after child and the local authority will exercise parental responsibility for the child.

«To promote amicable settlement of disputes between parties to a marriage attendant upon the dissolution of their marriage, the parties may enter into an agreement containing provisions for disposition of any property owned by either of them, maintenance of either of them, support, parental responsibility allocation of their children, and support of their children [for certain expenses such as education] after the children attain majority.»