(c) subject to any order of a court for the time being in force, a person who has
parental responsibility for a child because of the operation of this Act or another Australian law and is responsible for the day ‑ to ‑ day or long ‑ term care, welfare and development of the child should be regarded as having rights of custody in respect of the child; and
(a) each of the parents of a child should be regarded as having rights of custody in respect of the child unless the parent has
no parental responsibility for the child because of any order of a court for the time being in force; and
Not exact matches
Lucy and Joe already both have «
parental responsibility»
for their
children,
because they are the parents and they are married to each other.
Although no federal laws specifically address custody,
parental responsibility, visitation or time - sharing issues in military divorces, these issues are often made more challenging
because service members» obligations to their jobs require extra flexibility and creativity in creating parenting plans and time - sharing arrangements that will work
for both parents as well as serve the best interests of the
children.
(6) In any proceeding under this section, the court may not deny shared
parental responsibility and time - sharing rights to a parent solely
because that parent is or is believed to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus, but the court may, in an order approving the parenting plan, require that parent to observe measures approved by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States Public Health Service or by the Department of Health
for preventing the spread of human immunodeficiency virus to the
child.
(1) If a supplemental petition or a motion
for modification of time - sharing and
parental responsibility is filed
because a parent is activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service and the parent's ability to comply with time - sharing is materially affected as a result, the court may not issue an order or modify or amend a previous judgment or order that changes time - sharing as it existed on the date the parent was activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service, except that a court may enter a temporary order to modify or amend time - sharing if there is clear and convincing evidence that the temporary modification or amendment is in the best interests of the
child.
In about 20 % of the cases that come to me
because of my expertise in «
parental alienation» it turns out that the targeted parent who is alleging «
parental alienation» actually turns out to be the narcissistic parent who is externalizing blame and
responsibility for the
child's reluctance to be with the narcissistic parent onto the other parent by alleging «
parental alienation»
because the narcissistic targeted parent feels «entitled» to possess the
child.
(b) immediately before the adoption, a person had
parental responsibility for the
child, whether in full or to a limited extent and whether
because of section 61C or
because of a parenting order.
From a socio - cultural viewpoint, cognitively responsive behaviours (e.g. maintaining versus redirecting interests, rich verbal input) are thought to facilitate higher levels of learning
because they provide a structure or scaffold
for the young
child's immature skills, such as developing attentional and cognitive capacities.9 Responsive behaviours in this framework promote joint engagement and reciprocity in the parent -
child interaction and help a
child learn to assume a more active and ultimately independent role in the learning process.10 Responsive support
for the
child to become actively engaged in solving problems is often referred to as
parental scaffolding, and is also thought to be key
for facilitating
children's development of self - regulation and executive function skills, behaviours that allow the
child to ultimately assume
responsibility for their well - being.11, 12