Sentences with phrase «parents and the child over»

Here are some practical ideas for bridging the gap between parent and child over long distances.

(S) he may talk to the children briefly or hear from a psychologist about their observations of the parents and the children over a period of several hours.

Future studies should consider dynamics between parents and children over time and examine how parents and children communicate their feelings toward one another.

As parents age, conflicts can erupt between parents and their children over living situations, driving, or the need for more help with daily activities.

Informed consent was obtained from parents and children over 15 years of age, which is according to Finnish regulations.

Not exact matches

«Inspiring children through play and creativity is crucial to early development and no company has done more in that space over many generations than Mattel,» said Georgiadis in a statement «As a parent, I have seen this first hand and am honored to be joining the Company at this exciting time of renewed focus.»

Too often parents get bent out of shape over the Ds and Fs that make their way to a child's report card.

This group of parents prioritize children over marriage and often are on single incomes.

The loan will transfer over to the child and the parent will no longer be responsible.

There is no benefit at all from income splitting for single parents, or for two parent families in which both earners are in the same tax bracket, including the middle and bottom income tax brackets; these families with children under 18 represent over half of all families that are the apparent target of the scheme, according to the Broadbent Institute study, The Big Split.

Amazon adds parental controls and kid's content to Echo speakers With privacy concerns rising, the new controls could give parents peace of mindAmazon has introduced an update that will give parents greater control over their children's activities on Echo speaker devices.

Specifically, parents pass along information to their children, and thus knowledge is preserved, accµmulates over time, and gives its possessors a compet ¡ tive edge over rival tribes.

A Christian online safety expert and campaigner has said parents have a «total lack of awareness» over child internet safety.

If I got to watch a school bus full of children roll over in front of their christian parents and burst into flames and roast I would probably jerk off right then and there.

The groundbreaking work that Daniel Patrick Moynihan did in 1965, on the black family, is an example — along with the critical research of psychologist Judith Wallerstein over several decades on the impact of divorce on children; Barbara Dafoe Whitehead's well - known work on the outcomes of single parenthood for children; Sara McLanahan and Gary Sandefur's seminal book, Growing Up with a Single Parent; and David Blankenhorn's Fatherless America, another lengthy summarization of the bad empirical news about family breakup.

Parents still have the most influence over their children, far and above the media and their friends.»

But Katie watched rag - poor parents hand over their children to the orphanage so they'd get three meals a day and education.

Over time, parents teach the child to look both ways, to follow the traffic signs, and to be careful.

It is argued then, that the crushing, heart - wrenching pain of watching a child die, and the sense of deep loss that lingers afterwards for days, months, and even years in the hearts of parents, is the pain that God experiences for an eternity over the death of His Son.

Stephanie Davies Arai, a UK - based communication specialist who has worked with parents for over eighteen years, says that at around four to five years of age, children begin to classify and categorize everything around them.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackChildren Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

Once they hit between 14 and 16, parents lose a good deal of control over their children.

Here in the U.S., homeless and suicide rates among LGBT youth remain shockingly high, in part because conservative Christian leaders like John McArthur instruct parents of gay children to «hand them over to Satan» and refuse to associate with them.

It was an Act which, in short, deliberately weakened the authority of parents over their children and made the state a kind of co-parent.

No one seemed concerned about the children in modern divorce, except to argue over parenting responsibilities such as child - support and visitation rights.

Fegans, which offers children's counselling and parent support services in London and the South East, questioned more than 600 youngsters and nearly 200 parents at the New Wine United 2017 event in Shepton Mallet, Somerset over the summer.

It's obsession over something that really, truly isn't anyone's business but a child's parents (and not an adult's parents).

Nevertheless, we need to examine whether the biological and genetic link between parent and child is so important that addressing infertility should take priority over other pressing medical concerns.

So as a parent then you allow evil to trample all over your children so you can come in and save them and be the hero.

Parents» control over their children is increasingly challenged as the young people become more independent, rely increasingly on their peers, and often rebel openly.

He also argues that parents exercise certain «sole and inviolable» lawmaking powers over their children in the areas of custody, care, upbringing, discipline, and education, which the Supreme Court has acknowledged in many cases under the due - process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

An era when many parents turned their children over to subminimum - wage workers by day, and told them stories like The Giving Tree during «quality time» at night.

Those who love Him - holy parents, good and dear friends, faithful and loving wife or husband, children that are a joy, and priests who are spiritual and true, and over all the Eucharist and the Church - all of this spiritual «ecology» may give us years and years of almost unbroken happiness.

While Christian parents may rightly wish to prevent premature sexual experimentation and possibly disastrous relationships, a parent of a young adult actually has little control over the private life of grown «children.»

A necessary consideration is that in Canon Law it is parents who are given all the rights over the education of children and not the state, not even bishops whose role is the very limited one of providing Catholic schools where they do not exist and inspecting and regulating them.

Over the past year I have heard from many parents who see this painful struggle in their children and ask how they should respond.

Krish Kandiah, founder and director of the charity, was joined by foster carers, adoptive parents, adopted children, and care leavers to present postcards from foster carers, adopters, and supporters all over the country asking the Prime Minister to prioritise care for vulnerable children.

SO WHY ARE CATHOLIC PARENTS SO WILLING TO SACRIFICE THEIR CHILDREN, and hand them over to these perverts?!?

Like Debesay, several are parents, and according to local sources, over 50 children are currently without one or both parents as a result of these raids.

In the future, in the words of Princeton geneticist Lee Silver, «Parents can gain complete control over their destiny, with the ability to guide and enhance the characteristics of their children, and their children's children as well.»

You have your parents on this same side of the scale, their love for you, the love of your little sisters, the possibility of marriage and having children, of watching those children grow up over the years, a real job where you can earn money without remorse.

«s internal debate over this sets up a fascinating conversation about the balance between personal ambition and responsibility to others that I don't believe a lot of parents will see coming after watching the film with their children.

Coco «s internal debate over this sets up a fascinating conversation about the balance between personal ambition and responsibility to others that I don't believe a lot of parents will see coming after watching the film with their children.

I usually introduce the PAC approach in counseling or growth group sessions by diagramming it on a sheet of paper and giving an illustration or two of the times I let my own Parent and Child take over unconstructively.

He had a normal birth, but, writes Andrew Solomon in Far From the Tree: Parents, Children, and the Search for Identity, «things fell off over the next few months.

The natural disorder of children expresses itself in the tyrannical will to power over others, and the conventional response of parents is to subdue this desire with the discipline of the traditional virtues.

That means they are rivals, which creates guilt in the child as he has to take over the responsibility and, in fact, destroy the power of the parent.

This child will be the one who has to grow up with the name, deal with being picked on in school over the name, for the name showing up on resumes, and being judged by that resume before even getting an interview, etc.... A parent should have the right to name their child, but to a limit.

And as becomes clear from Fish's book, the two eras, modernity and postmodernity, go together as parent and child and share the same pathos, because of the way a once hegemonic civilization of rationality and abstract principle almost inevitably yielded its achievements over to postmodern incoherenAnd as becomes clear from Fish's book, the two eras, modernity and postmodernity, go together as parent and child and share the same pathos, because of the way a once hegemonic civilization of rationality and abstract principle almost inevitably yielded its achievements over to postmodern incoherenand postmodernity, go together as parent and child and share the same pathos, because of the way a once hegemonic civilization of rationality and abstract principle almost inevitably yielded its achievements over to postmodern incoherenand child and share the same pathos, because of the way a once hegemonic civilization of rationality and abstract principle almost inevitably yielded its achievements over to postmodern incoherenand share the same pathos, because of the way a once hegemonic civilization of rationality and abstract principle almost inevitably yielded its achievements over to postmodern incoherenand abstract principle almost inevitably yielded its achievements over to postmodern incoherence.

Health conscious parents are likely to choose this «whole grain» treat over white flour animal crackers, since they have no way to know that the whole grain variety contains high levels of the carcinogen «Parents trust companies like Disney and Walgreens to make safe products for their children, but our testing shows that when it comes to these animal crackers, parents just can't trust in Disney,» said Michael Green, Chief Executive Officer parents are likely to choose this «whole grain» treat over white flour animal crackers, since they have no way to know that the whole grain variety contains high levels of the carcinogen «Parents trust companies like Disney and Walgreens to make safe products for their children, but our testing shows that when it comes to these animal crackers, parents just can't trust in Disney,» said Michael Green, Chief Executive Officer Parents trust companies like Disney and Walgreens to make safe products for their children, but our testing shows that when it comes to these animal crackers, parents just can't trust in Disney,» said Michael Green, Chief Executive Officer parents just can't trust in Disney,» said Michael Green, Chief Executive Officer of CEH.