Parents at every level of income do this.
Not exact matches
The social giant collects much more information than that, which results in
at least 600 targeting options including household
income,
level of education, home type, home value, home ownership status, household composition,
parents of children with specific ages, newly engaged couples, new vehicle buyers, expats, a variety
of buyer profiles, people who frequently buy online, frequent travelers, and much more.
In addition,
parents of all
income levels appreciate the convenience and peace
of mind knowing their children will receive a healthy breakfast
at school.
«Congressman Ellison recognizes that progressive politics matter
at the most local
of levels: to families seeking a job that pays the bills, to kids from low -
income families hoping to go to college, and to
parents worried about whether their kids
of color will be treated fairly by the criminal justice system.
- GDP per capita is still lower than it was before the recession - Earnings and household
incomes are far lower in real terms than they were in 2010 - Five million people earn less than the Living Wage - George Osborne has failed to balance the Budget by 2015, meaning 40 %
of the work must be done in the next parliament - Absolute poverty increased by 300,000 between 2010/11 and 2012/13 - Almost two - thirds
of poor children fail to achieve the basics
of five GCSEs including English and maths - Children eligible for free school meals remain far less likely to be school - ready than their peers - Childcare affordability and availability means many
parents struggle to return to work - Poor children are less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment
of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession
levels at around 200,000 - Pay
of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number
of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a decade
In a June speech
at the City Club in downtown Chicago, Lewis asked her well - heeled audience, «When will we address the fact that rich white people think they know what's in the best interest
of children
of African - Americans and Latinos, no matter what the
parents»
income or education
level?»
She found that student performance is better in areas with competing multiple districts, where
parents at the same
income level can move to another locality, in search
of a better education.
These include a relatively standard set
of student and family demographics: an indicator for whether anyone in the family received free or reduced - price meals
at school in the past year, the family's
income as a percentage
of the federal poverty line, whether the child was born in the United States, whether the child lives with a single mother, and the highest
level of education either
parent has attained.
Parents of students living in a household with income above the poverty level are more likely to be involved in school activities than parents of children living in a household at or below the povert
Parents of students living in a household with
income above the poverty
level are more likely to be involved in school activities than
parents of children living in a household at or below the povert
parents of children living in a household
at or below the poverty line.
She found that student performance is better in areas with competing multiple districts, where
parents at the same
income level can move —
at the margin — from one locality to another nearby, in search
of a better education for their children.
Although Berkeley's student assignment plan allows
parents to rank - order their first - choice, second - choice, and third - choice schools, it considers a number
of factors in the actual assignment process, including the
parent's
level of education,
income, and primary language spoken
at home.
In addition,
parents of all
income levels appreciate the convenience and peace
of mind knowing their children will receive a healthy breakfast
at school.
Chicago Public Schools divides areas
of the city into one
of four socio - economic tiers by looking
at each area's median
income, education
level, home - ownership rates, single -
parent family rates, rates
of English - speaking, and neighborhood school performance.
I think some
of their motivation was less self - serving; they wanted to fulfill Dr. Hall's vision that low -
income children from single
parent homes and tough neighborhoods could and would succeed
at levels comparable to suburban Atlanta peers.
When some part
of parental benefits are reserved for the so - called primary worker or for both
parents in a dual -
income situation where there is roughly equal earning
levels, then the second
parent, the so - called primary earner, is going to get parental leave
at a higher
income replacement rate.
At the Goldberg Law Group, we can explain
income - based state calculations
of payments for payers or payees, the factors that courts examine when determining appropriate
levels of spousal maintenance and things to consider when scheduling a noncustodial
parent's availability for visitation.
The amounts to be paid are based on the average amounts
of money that
parents at various
income levels spend to raise a child.
The
Income Shares model for determining the amount
of child support is predicated on the concept that the child should receive support
at the same
level that the child would receive if the
parents were living together.
Family
level factors were assessed
at age 5 months, including family adversity (single
parent family, low parental education and age
at birth
of first child, and insufficient
income) and harsh reactive
parenting (assessed using three self - rated items from the Parental Cognitions and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale).
These included characteristics on multiple
levels of the child's biopsychosocial context: (1) child factors: race / ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian / Pacific Islander / Alaska Native), age, gender, 9 - month Bayley Mental and Motor scores, birth weight (normal, moderately low, or very low),
parent - rated child health (fair / poor vs good / very good / excellent), and hours per week in child care; (2)
parent factors: maternal age, paternal age, SES (an ECLS - B — derived variable that includes maternal and paternal education, employment status, and
income), maternal marital status (married, never married, separated / divorced / widowed), maternal general health (fair / poor versus good / very good / excellent), maternal depression (assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
at 9 months and the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview
at 2 years), prenatal use
of tobacco and alcohol (any vs none), and violence against the mother; (3) household factors: single -
parent household, number
of siblings (0, 1, 2, or 3 +), language spoken
at home (English vs non-English), neighborhood good for raising kids (excellent / very good, good, or fair / poor), household urbanicity (urban city, urban county, or rural), and modified Home Observation for Measurement
of the Environment — Short Form (HOME - SF) score.
Using data from the 2003 American Time Use Survey (ATUS), this paper provides the national estimates
of time spent together by married
parents at varying
levels of income and education.
Eligibility for mothers included age < 18 years
at delivery, first - time delivery, black, low
income (defined as eligible for WIC — family
income under 185 %
of poverty
level), and no chronic illnesses that would interfere with
parenting or adolescent development.
She works
at the federal and state
levels on child care and early education promoting policies that support both healthy child development and the needs
of low -
income working
parents.
After controlling for age
at adoption, age, the adoptive mother's education
level, household
income, and the girls» corresponding behavior problems from the second wave
of data (2 years prior), we found that that the association between NCR - family stress and the adopted Chinese girls» internalizing problems and externalizing problems was mediated by authoritarian
parenting and moderated by authoritative
parenting.
Recent research conducted in mainland China found that obesity prevalence was higher among children in wealthier families, 4 but the patterns were different in Hong Kong with higher rates
of childhood obesity among lower
income families.4 5 Hong Kong, despite having a per capita gross domestic product
of Hong Kong dollar (HK$) 273 550, has large
income differences between rich and poor as reflected by a high Gini coefficient
of 0.539 reported in 2016; approximately 20 %
of the population are living in poverty as defined by a monthly household
income below half
of the Hong Kong median.6 It is widely accepted that population health tend to be worse in societies with greater
income inequalities, and hence low -
income families in these societies are particularly
at risk
of health problems.7 In our previous study, children from Hong Kong Chinese low -
income families experienced poorer health and more behavioural problems than other children in the population
at similar age.8 Adults from these families also reported poorer health - related quality
of life (HRQOL), 9 with 6.1 %
of the
parents having a known history
of mental illness and 18.2 %
of them reporting elevated
level of stress.
Ultimately, targeted interventions
at risk factors identified by this study can be developed
at the community
level to improve the health
of parents and children
of low -
income families.
Research shows it has the potential to promote normal developmental trajectories for high - risk children, such as those from low -
income backgrounds and / or those with very premature births.13 In contrast, unresponsive
parenting may jeopardize children's development, particularly those
at higher risk for developmental problems.14 The critical importance
of responsive
parenting is highlighted by recent evidence identifying links between high
levels of early responsive
parenting and larger hippocampal volumes for normally developing preschool aged children.
For example, compared to older mothers, teen mothers display lower
levels of verbal stimulation and involvement, higher
levels of intrusiveness, and maternal speech that is less varied and complex.47, 48 Mothers with fewer years
of education read to their children less frequently25, 49 and demonstrate less sophisticated language and literacy skills themselves, 50 which affects the quantity and quality
of their verbal interactions with their children.2 Parental education, in turn, relates to household
income: poverty and persistent poverty are strongly associated with less stimulating home environments, 51 and
parents living in poverty have children who are
at risk for cognitive, academic, and social - emotional difficulties.52, 53 Finally, Hispanic and African American mothers are, on average, less likely to read to their children than White, non-Hispanic mothers; 54 and Spanish - speaking Hispanic families have fewer children's books available in the home as compared to their non-Hispanic counterparts.25 These racial and ethnic findings are likely explained by differences in family resources across groups, as minority status is often associated with various social - demographic risks.
Eligibility for mothers included age less than 18 years
at delivery, first - time delivery, African American ethnicity, low
income (defined as eligible for WIC: family
income under 185 %
of poverty
level), and no chronic illnesses that would interfere with
parenting or adolescent development.