It seeks a constitutional amendment to give
parents exclusive control over the education of their children — and protect it from the United Nations!
Not exact matches
Under the 2017 Plan, a change in
control is defined to include (1) the acquisition by any person or company of more than 50 % of the combined voting power of our then outstanding stock, (2) a merger, consolidation, or similar transaction in which our stockholders immediately before the transaction do not own, directly or indirectly, more than 50 % of the combined voting power of the surviving entity (or the
parent of the surviving entity), (3) a sale, lease,
exclusive license, or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets other than to an entity more than 50 % of the combined voting power of which is owned by our stockholders, and (4) an unapproved change in the majority of the board of directors.
In 1977 Robert McNamara, as head of the World Bank, saw in population growth the «gravest issue» short of nuclear war and in a particularly prophetic statement lamented that the decisions that had led to this growth were «not in the
exclusive control of a few governments but rather in the literally hundreds of millions of individual
parents who will determine the outcome.»
The GSBA has a long standing legislative position supporting,» the constitutional authority vesting
exclusive control over public schools to local boards of education as the level of government closest and most responsive to the taxpayers and
parents of the children being educated.
According to the Texas Family Code 153.6061 (c), the appointment of a
parenting facilitator means the court still has: (1) the
exclusive jurisdiction to determine issues of conservatorship, support, and possession of or access to the child; and (2) the authority to exercise management and
control of the suit.
In a meta - analysis of 70 published studies (including 9,957 children and
parents, and a core set of 51 randomized
controlled trials with 6,282 mothers and children), Bakermans - Kranenburg, van IJzendoorn & Juffer8 demonstrated that the most effective attachment - based interventions to improve
parent sensitivity (d = 0.33, p <.001) and promote secure infant - caregiver attachment (d = 0.20, p <.001) included the following characteristics: (1) a clear and
exclusive focus on behavioural training for
parent sensitivity rather than a focus on sensitivity plus support, or a focus on sensitivity plus support plus internal representations (e.g. individual therapy); (2) the use of video feedback; (3) fewer than five sessions (fewer than five sessions were as effective as five to 16 sessions, and 16 sessions or more were least effective); (4) a later start, i.e. after the infant is six months or older (rather than during pregnancy or before age six months); and (5) conducted by non-professionals.
Second, this
exclusive focus on support and
control fails to account for
parents» own antisocial history, which may directly influence child behavior, and in turn may shape social interactions between
parent and child.