Not exact matches
«Through our Classification and Rating Administration (CARA), the
movie rating system, the MPAA is firmly committed to helping
parents make informed decisions as to what they consider appropriate
viewing for their families, both on and offline.
Parents would be well advised to see the
movie prior to taking older family members, or await the home video release, which will allow for better control over the
viewing experience.
Filmed in Marshfield and Duxbury, Massachusetts, at a summer resort filled with young people and their
parents, the
movie is obviously heading in the direction of bringing Duncan up to an eight, maybe a nine, and all is told from his point of
view.
While not the best
movie ever invented, the sarcastic
view on everything from the SAT, college essays, admission boards, and
parents make it worth seeing at least once.
This real - time problemsolving is then turned into a MathCast: a
movie that can be
viewed from a YouTube - likeapplication on the school's home page.Students can review problems they had difficulty with, and
parents can see what theirchildren are learning.
Parents can set up special accounts for children that restrict them to shopping for kids content only (or not at all), limit them to
viewing files in the library, disable the browser and limit them to only child - friendly books,
movies and apps.
Parents love having every amenity needed — from a variety of beach gear,
movies and video games for entertainment, a washer and dryer for sandy swimwear, a large master bedroom with complete ocean -
view and a large lanai for sipping cocktails while soaking up each day's glorious sunset.
These new controls will be joining the rest of the features found on the
Parent Dashboard, including stats on what kind of content your kids are consuming, how much time they're spending on their tablets, and Amazon's «discussion cards» that aim to help
parents talk to their kids about the books,
movies, and games they're
viewing.
For example, compared with an adolescent at minimum risk, one whose
parents subscribe to 2
movie channels, allow 3 videos per week (the average for most adolescents), allow 1 or 2 trips to the
movie theater per month, and allow some R - rated
movie viewing would have seen about 1000 additional
movie smoking depictions, raising his or her risk of trying smoking by a factor of 3 (Table 3, model 2).
We asked children (9 — 12 years of age) how often their
parents engaged in specific behaviors to monitor their
movie viewing and if their
parents allowed them to watch R - rated
movies.
Model findings revealed that adolescents» sensation seeking was related to greater risk for smoking onset not only directly but also indirectly through their
parents becoming more permissive of R - rated
movie viewing.
In addition, changes in friend smoking have been found to mediate the
movie smoking effect on behavior; therefore, friend smoking was rejected as a covariate.37, 38 More specifically, by being strict regarding R - rated
movie viewing,
parents decrease the risk of their children having a smoking sibling because that sibling presumably has comparable restrictions.
Finally, the impact of just one
movie - related
parenting strategy was investigated in our study, whereas other investigators examined other aspects of
movie - related
parenting, such as
parents accompanying their children to the video store, actively determining
movie ratings before allowing their children to
view movies, monitoring
movies viewed at friends» houses, and coviewing R - rated
movies.21 Because sensation - seeking adolescents are more likely to seek novel and intense sensations and experiences, 28 parental
movie monitoring may be particularly important because the adolescents themselves are less likely to be able to resist the temptation of watching R - rated
movies.
Given the small proportion of
parents who restrict
viewing of R - rated
movies, it is likely that few
parents are aware of the impact that risk behaviors in
movies may have on their children.
Holding the line on R - rated
movie viewing may not be easy for some
parents, however.
The analyses also included age, race / ethnicity (three binary variables for Black, Hispanic and other ethnicity, coded with Whites as the reference group), gender, household income and parental education, media -
viewing habits — hours watching television on a school day and how often the participant
viewed movies together with his / her
parents — and receptivity to alcohol marketing (based on whether or not the adolescent owned alcohol - branded merchandise at waves 2 — 4).31 Family predictors included perceived inhome availability of alcohol, subject - reported parental alcohol use (assessed at the 16 M survey and assumed to be invariant) and perceptions of authoritative
parenting (α = 0.80).32 Other covariates included school performance, extracurricular participation, number of friends who used alcohol, weekly spending money, sensation seeking (4 - wave Cronbach's α range = 0.57 — 0.62) 33 and rebelliousness (0.71 — 0.76).34 All survey items are listed in table S1.
Of those who were allowed to watch R - rated
movies, one third (34.7 %) always
viewed them with a
parent and two thirds (65.3 %) sometimes watched them without a
parent.
PLEASE NOTE: We recommend that
parents always
view an adoption - themed
movie first to determine its appropriateness for THEIR...