Prosecutors on Tuesday showed the jury emails from Taub that suggested the then - Columbia University cancer doctor secretly disdained Silver and his law firm as
part of a dog - eat - dog crowd that merely sought to get rich off mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer caused
by exposure to
asbestos.
With a headline reading «Justices reject tort reform provision,» the Houston Chronicle reported over the weekend that a small
part of the brutal 2003 Texas «tort reform» law was struck down
by the Texas Supreme Court because its retroactivity provision was «designed to protect one company from a lawsuit brought
by a man dying of
asbestos exposure,» specifically Crown Cork & Seal Inc. of Pennsylvania.
Examples of such cases are Chandler v Cape Plc [2011] EWHC 951 (QB)(liability of non-employer for
exposure to
asbestos), Kynixa Ltd v Hynes and others [2008] EWHC 1495 (QB)(claims arising from alleged breaches of restrictive covenants in employment contracts), Romantiek BVBA v Simms [2008] EWHC 3099 (QB) a claim alleging that a public official had committed the tort of misfeasance in public office when discharging a licensing function, OOO and others v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [20011] EWHC 1246 (QB)(claims
by young foreign females that they had been trafficked into the UK
by foreign nationals for the purpose of slavery and that officers of the Metropolitan Police Force breached their human rights in failing to investigate their complaints adequately or at all) and Mouncher and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2016] EWHC 1367 (QB)(claims
by retired and serving police officers for false imprisonment, misfeasance in public office and malicious prosecution against South Wales Police arising from an investigation
by officers of that force into alleged criminal conduct on the
part of the claimants during the course of an investigation into a notorious murder in South Wales.