Not exact matches
A former U.S. Army sergeant and two other U.S. citizens were found guilty by a
jury in Manhattan
federal court on Wednesday of taking
part in a plot to murder a woman in the Philippines for money, prosecutors said.
A
federal jury in Manhattan found Joseph Percoco guilty of two counts of conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud and one count of soliciting bribes after deliberating for
parts of three weeks.
As
part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, a
federal grand
jury recently indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities for waging «information warfare» against the U.S.
Joseph Percoco, second from left, leaving
federal court on Sept. 22, 2016, was among 8 charged Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2016, in a 14 - county grand
jury indictment as
part of a wide - ranging bribery scheme.
She withdrew from the case last month, citing a conflict because her husband former Niagara County Republican Chairman Henry F. Wojtaszek testified in late 2014 before a
federal grand
jury in Manhattan as
part of a related investigation.
Federal prosecutors have subpoenaed records involving former U.S. Sen. Alfonse D'Amato and other top Long Island political figures as
part of a wide - ranging grand
jury investigation into the finances of three prominent local foundations that have given out millions of dollars.
He is already serving life without parole because of a Niagara County Court conviction for the murders, but he and Pirk face mandatory
federal sentences of life without parole for the murders because the
jury found they were
part of a racketeering conspiracy.
The prosecutors sent a grand
jury subpoena to the Glenwood real estate company in May 2014 as
part of their probe into kickbacks pocketed by Silver, according to the Manhattan
federal court papers filed earlier this month.
Boyland was convicted after his attorneys failed to convince a
jury that he had solicited more than $ 250,000 in bribes from undercover
federal agents as
part of a plan «to scam a pair of corrupt businessmen who were trying to scam him.»
To the fullest extent permitted by law, by your access to the Sites, you agree that: (i) any claim, dispute or cause of action regarding the Sites or these Terms shall be brought individually (NOT AS
PART OF A CLASS ACTION) in the
federal or state courts of the State of New York, and, such claim / dispute / cause of action will be resolved by a judge and THE RIGHT TO A
JURY TRIAL IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVED; (ii) you consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts as the exclusive tribunal for adjudication of any such claim / dispute / cause of action, expressly waiving any right of forum non convenience, change of venue or like right; (iii) your recovery will be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs involved in specifically accessing the Sites (if any) and you expressly waive your right to all other forms of recovery, including by way of example only, punitive, consequential, indirect, incidental, special and exemplary damages as well as attorneys» fees for bringing such claim / dispute / cause of action; and (iv) the court shall apply the law of the State of New York in adjudicating any such claim / dispute / cause of action, except for the choice of law / conflict of law rules of the State of New York (or of any other jurisdiction which would result in the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York).
Sentencing range enhancements based on facts alleged in charges of which a defendant has been acquitted («acquitted conduct») have long been among the most controversial features of the
Federal Sentencing Guidelines, in
part because acquitted conduct enhancements effectively nullify the
jury's determination in a criminal case.