They were
part of a digression in a talk I gave to the 1970 Exeter conference on children's literature, and if I'd realised then what a powder - keg I was throwing my fag - end of thought into I would have kept my trap shut.
Not exact matches
PR 248.24 - 30 is essentially a
digression, which could have been composed when the fourth category was introduced, or later, but it is not likely
part of III.2.2 because
of its mention
of «physical feeling».
I'm always getting «flagged» in «make your blog better» programs for using too complex
of a sentence format; my (excessive) fondness for semicolons is probably a big
part of it, taken with the parenthetical
digressions.
It was
part of a much longer
digression that was truncated, and meant as shorthand for a long discourse on water use, intensity
of energy used in water, etc..
As an aside and slight conceptual
digression with a tip
of the cap to Roger Pielke Sr, perhaps this enjoyable and profitable Holocene climate is due, in
part, to Anthropogenic Climate Moderation from 10K - years
of agricultural and landuse alteration.
Fascinating
digression — but what about the original questions: can one have symbolic damages in an era
of proportionality, and do the costs
of running the court system form a legitimate
part of a calculation
of proportionality?