This is
a part of the model intercomparison project with UC Davis, UC Santa Cruz, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
My guess is they don't even necessarily use identical inputs for forcing and / or initial conditions, although hopefully they're close since the runs are
part of a model intercomparison process.
Not exact matches
The researchers looked at a combination
of roughly 50 climate
models from around the world that are
part of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), which is
part of the World Climate Research Programme.
Most
of the
modelling groups that contributed output to the current MMD at PCMDI also archived simulations from their earlier
models (circa 2000) as
part of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP1 & 2).
«Cloud - resolving
model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case:
Part I - Convective updrafts.»
For example, nearly all recent
model intercomparisons show that AOGCMs poorly reproduce precipitation in 30 ° S - 30 ° N, they still diverge for cloud cover evolution at different levels
of the vertical column, and I don't clearly understand for my
part how we can speculate on long term trends
of tropospheric T without a good understanding
of these convection - condensation - precipitation process.
The only systematic evaluation
of carbon
models that were interactively coupled to climate
models occurred as
part of the Coupled Climate - Carbon Cycle
Model Intercomparison Project (C4MIP), where Friedlingstein et al. (2006) compared the ability
of a suite
of models to simulate historical atmospheric CO2 concentration forced by observed emissions.
Most
of the
modelling groups that contributed output to the current MMD at PCMDI also archived simulations from their earlier
models (circa 2000) as
part of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP1 & 2).
In Handbook
of Climate Change and Agroecosystems: The Agricultural
Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) Integrated Crop and Economic Assessments,
Part 1.
It describes the generation
of climate scenarios for agricultural
modeling applications conducted as
part of the Agricultural
Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments.
Most
of these experiments are
part of the so - called CMIP - 5
model intercomparison project, which has been set up as a major input into AR5.
Here seven GVMs are used to investigate possible responses
of global natural terrestrial vegetation to a major new set
of future climate and atmospheric CO2 projections generated as
part of the fifth phase
of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)(6), the primary climate
modeling contribution to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment.
The
models whose physical formulation and simulation characteristics are described here are intended to be supplied to the public as
part of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 in support
of the IPCC Fifth Assessment.
We obtained daily projections
of temperature, soil moisture, and solar radiation from recent Earth System
Models developed as
part of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 to the Fifth Assessment Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (S1 Table).
There is a large ongoing effort as
part of the Climate
Model Intercomparison Project - Phase 5 (CMIP5) to make projections about the future climate that will account both
of these influences.