Not exact matches
Such a new ecclesiastical body is designed to allow these pathetic human beings, who are so deeply locked into a world that no longer exists, to form a community in which they can continue to hate gay
people, distort gay
people with their hopeless rhetoric and to be
part of a
religious fellowship in which they can continue to feel justified in their homophobic prejudices for the rest
of their tortured lives.
The more educated one becomes the less
religious one is... when you see educated politicians and professional
people of all kinds talking religiousness it's lip service for the ignorant... it's
part of their job... other wise there's trouble from the little
people.
And when they ask questions you can not answer because you do not know, just revert to the
religious person's favorite default, «It is
part of god's plan.
What we are calling atheistic nature today resembles a path
of anarchic extremism, which is mainly made up
of people who are
part of a system
of former
religious extremists and Judeo - Christian zealots.
They fail to distinguish two types
of religious persons who may be
part of this group: the first, who depend completely upon the literal interpretation
of Scripture and tradition by an authoritarian pastor, and second, those who undertake rescue activity as the command
of God, based upon a thoughtful and self - ratified interpretation
of the ethical imperatives
of the gospel.
A very large
part of most
religious beliefs involves free will and
people are free to work towards affording healthcare,
people and
people can adopt healthy lifestyles which minimize the need for healthcare and
of course,
people can choose to help others through donations.
I am not the most
religious of people, but I do believe in God, and Jesus... but many
people seem to forget that God's SON sacrificied himself for our sins... in my book, a SON is
part of a FAMILY... God put us on this earth to be
of free will and to make our own way... Love being the biggest
part of that way... we love God and we love Jesus... but we are also all
part of his FAMILY... He made us all to be
part of a unit that has hope and faith and love... we were meant to procreate... so what does it matter if a
person who is dying does not automatically think
of God, but
of their loved ones?
So many
religious people whine about «context, context», yet either never give what the context is in their mind, or the «context» is contradictory to other
parts of the bible, and it merely turns into excuses and assertions.
They are a
part of the history
of human attempts to control other
people — and they are badly written and a truly pathetic example
of religious writing as well.
Ultimately, much
of this is a result
of the modern «competitive» paradigm
of religious communities: being right, having the truth, drawing
people into the light from the dark, etc. all becomes about feeling good about ones own membership and being
part of those who are «right».
Religious people should recognize that (if there is a god),
part of his plan is for us to test our boundaries, learn what we can, etc..
If
people are making up
religious belief systems entirely out
of their imaginations it only stands to reason that what one group
of people in one
part of the world come up with will be different than what a different group in some other
part of the world come up with independently.
I used to believe that our epidemic
of religious illiteracy was rooted in large
part in a system
of public education unwilling and unprepared to teach our young
people about the Bible and the world's religions.
«
People who go to church are more likely to volunteer and give to charity — not just because they're
religious, but because they're
part of a community.»
The Italian Bishops» Conference said that the crucifix is «not only a
religious symbol but also a cultural sign» and noted that its display in public buildings is «
part of the historic heritage
of the Italian
people.»
If this quality
of relationships is experienced, to some degree,
part of the time, then a deep - level
religious attitude toward
persons and life will be caught by the children and reaffirmed in the adults.
In a country
of 162 million
people tensions often lead to violent uprisings between Christians and Muslims and being
part of the
religious minority can be an issue.
Each
person saw and felt the spirit
of God working through the
religious community and knew himself to be a
part of the priesthood
of all believers.
I guess the main
part of my question however is, if a
person is brought back to life from being braindead, what are the
religious implications to that?
There is no where in any
part of Quran or Sunnah where it says
people or youth are to be chained... and kept in dungeons... Thisnis ignorance, arrogance and conspiracy done by ill hearted
people in the name
of religion when it is by no mean a
part of religion... I have seen such cases only at remote poor areas when they have mentally sick youth or
people who could be dangerous for others and can not afford to hospitalize are being kept chained like that but not in
religious establishments, rather at places where fraud witch doctors who claim that those are possessed...!!!
Participants in this practice, known as scriptural reasoning, are
part of a movement that wants to protect religiously plural societies while simultaneously encouraging
religious people to enter more deeply into public discourse.
While reference to a target
people group's
religious writings can be made as a
part of bridge building, care should be exercised not to imply a wholesale acceptance
of such.
Remember — the primary religions
of the day were the fertility cults that believed, as
part of their
religious rites, that sexual relations with another somehow conveyed a portion
of that
person's strength and power to you.
Some
of the reasons mentioned are: competitive missionary activities in several
parts of the world; the re-emergence
of tensions between the Orthodox and Roman Catholic Church concerning the Eastern Rite Catholic churches; the use
of humanitarian help to influence
people to change their denomination; the growth
of religious fundamentalism and the impact
of sects and
religious movements.
If you believe that your particular «brand»
of Christianity is superior to others and that
people need to be converted to your particular
religious views then it is time to take a long hard look at you are
part of.
What's even more sad and pathetic is that
people continue to believe that the actions
of these heathens is actually
part of the
religious faith that they falsely claim.
The only
people willing to shake my hand, show me around, and invite me to things were
part of a
religious group (and no, they never tried to convert me, nor get me to attend their church).
I also take quite to heart the ways in which the
religious tradition lam
part of has fomented, exacerbated, and then walked past much
of the suffering caused by
people and institutions that have claimed to be the very messengers
of God.
Although there have been some clever moves in political philosophy to explain why the
religious voice should not be a
part of our public debates, such theories wind up describing debates from which deeply
religious people are simply absent.
Tyagi Bill supported by the Prime Minister Desai restricting
religious conversion and also the discrimination
of scheduled caste converts to Christianity in the special benefits to
people of the scheduled caste background, may be mentioned as violations
of the covenant on the
part of the State; and the Christian
people have been unhappy at giving up minority communal safeguards and many efforts to organize Christian political parties off and on have been made in several states especially in the South by Christians.
«Freedom
of speech falls alongside other freedoms to live and be free from bombs falling on
people's heads and to be free from occupations,» says Omid Safi,
religious studies professor at the University
of North Carolina, referring to American military and intelligence operations in
parts of the Muslim world.
80 %
of the argument is that tax payers dollars is being spent on this cross and that its shoving religion down
peoples throats, making the root
of the problem the funding for the memorial, and using the
religious part as a cover up.
Now we KNOW there are no gods and that all the terrorism put into
people's heads by
religious frauds is just a pile
of lies so high and so deep that
part of the game is to get you to get lost in the complexity
of it.
The
religious ways
of peoples indigenous to this
part of the world were themselves varied and alive, and the European newcomers brought with them the
religious traditions [1]
of Europe.
However, this is another dilemma
people face: many want to be a
part of a community, especially their
religious community.
The hard
part is seeing that Jesus is against not only the
people I'm not very fond
of in the
religious establishment, but me as well.
Another
part of why many
people are spiritual but not
religious is that although they believe in a power greater than themselves, they are actually comfortable not knowing exactly what that power is.
As long as
people base decisions that impact others on their
religious beliefs, there is a good reason to make this
part of the social dialogue.
Keener says this
part of the Christmas story, «would have challenged the values
of many
religious people who despised shepherds, [whose] work kept them from participating in the
religious activities
of their communities.»
The
religious significance
of Zionism becomes indisputable when one realizes that «to raise the Jews from a disintegrated and fragmented mass
of individuals into an organic unity, whether it be the unity
of the Jewish
people as whole, or any
part of it, is to create the conditions that make the Jewish religion possible» (JC 329).
To be ignorant
of the Bible is to have a blind spot to much that any educated, as well as any
religious,
person ought to have acquaintance with as
part of his very being.
In this case, an insult against a
religious order who are literally causing God's
people to stumble, on the
part of God incarnate, is utterly justified.
However, on the other hand, this is another dilemma
people face: many want to be a
part of a community, especially their
religious community.
«It's more palatable to a wider demographic
of people by pulling that
religious part or separating that
religious part from it.»
Yet such
religious «music» is at the core
of our society; it is
part of who we are as a
people.
(Although there can be no doubt, as we have seen, that Jesus was put to death by the Roman authorities, I can not agree with those who virtually deny any hostility toward him on the
part of the authorized
religious leaders
of the
people, especially the Pharisees.
In the last
of his three «
part series,» Proposing Democracy Anew,» Richard John Neuhaus confusedly presents his position on the separation
of church and state, pluralism,
religious indifferentism, and the proper content
of the public square such that one is unsure whether he is proposing a societal ideal, for which Catholics and all
people should perpetually strive, or a merely provisional goal, for which we may now work temporarily, but only in lieu
of pursuing directly a greater ideal.
People and governments sometimes scapegoat religion or use it as additional motivation for the massive, but that is not religion's fault and generally not an accepted
part of many
religious doctrines.
Your detesting the «divisive nature
of religious mind control that makes good
people do horrible things» is again,
part of what the whole issue is about, in the opinions
of people like myself, @BG and others.
lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a
religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical
of me, AND thats the point, every
religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets
of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the
person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be
part of the group instead
of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be
part of the group.