Sentences with phrase «part of their due diligence when»

It also means that when employers pull your credit as part of their due diligence when making hiring decisions, you will be looked at as a responsible candidate.

Ideally you establish the initial stop loss price as a part of your due diligence when researching a stock, before you enter your buy order.

This analysis is always performed as part of your due diligence when purchasing the property to see if there is any upward mobility to rental increases.

Not exact matches

Due diligence is part of an investor's path to reach an investment decision and start an investment relationship (or more accurately, continue an investment relationship that began when they first met an entrepreneur).

A great part of the popularity is the confidence school management and teachers can have when considering their own management of responsibilities, workload, due diligence and peace of mind.

When I asked Thrush if he had found parts of the book that he would like to amend, he said yes, based on comments from a couple of players who had not returned phone calls or emails during his due - diligence work but did contact him once the book was published, to give him their perspectives.

As part of the agreement, BlackBerry would be free during the due diligence period to discuss terms with other potential buyers if and when they arise.

When you've narrowed down the search, look at the details, such as the new bank's fee schedule as a part of your due diligence and what balance you need to qualify for free checking.

However, historical returns are only part of the picture (as you're aware), and any investor must do due diligence when picking their investments anyway.

If I had the fortune to experience a time in my legal career once again, I would choose the time when I was involved in a whole IPO process, starting with the due diligence, analyzing all the legal issues we found during the process, participating in the plan making, drafting relevant documents, taking part in the deliberation of shareholders meeting, till the declaration of full set of materials.

As the question of written «seller consents» is a major point, it is not only reasonable to believe that with all the Attorneys and high priced experts, at the trough, that the Tribunal had «not been persuaded» based on their proper review of current and preexisting written «seller consents» (that would have formed part of the pertinent Listing Agreements), but even moreso that: by using the word «persuaded» the Competition Tribunal wrongly gave the impression that they had exercised proper due diligence regarding this question — when in fact, they had not exercised any!