Sentences with phrase «part of this question»

In July 2014, Fortune profiled Murphy as part of a question and answer series in which she explained her lengthy technology career and the challenges GoDaddy faces in helping its small business clients run their companies better using the data it collects for them.

I'll tackle the latter part of your question at a later date, because I don't think that's your best option right now.

And what I would say to the second part of your question, Nicole, is we continue to forecast, as we move through time, margin expansion in Channel Development.

And the second part of the question, is it a little early yet to be really aggressive in investing in the sector?

The purpose of the immense acquisition is part of a question... [Read more...]

Now I'll try to answer the first part of your question: ``... what would be your core, what would be your aggressive picks and how would you organize that.»

Yeah, to the first part of your question, our goal and aspiration for where we're headed on margins is not changed.

(1) So part of my question is were those «theological boxes» which caused your struggle, also part of what made an intense community?

Their response to the first part of the question is often one of embarrassment, because the amount of time that they spend in preparation is so little.

To the first part of the question my answer is unhesitatingly, Yes.

I guess the main part of my question however is, if a person is brought back to life from being braindead, what are the religious implications to that?

Whether or not masturbation can be part of healthy sexuality depends on how we define the second part of the question: healthy sexuality.

Another part of the question of postmodernity focuses less on cultural or ecclesial shifts than on more strictly intellectual problems.

In answer to the first part of your question I think now might be a good time to have such conversations because I think we are more open to this than ever before.

The sociologist Rodney Stark makes some headway in answering the first part of this question: traditional religion, by invoking supernatural power, can promise eternal life, reunion with the departed, a perfected soul, and unending bliss, all of which have obvious appeal and none of which can be offered by merely secular competitors (Stark 169).

What about the second part of the question...

What I am hoping to accomplish with this post is simply suggest that a big part of your question is culturally based.

(a) I think that was part of your questions.

Let me try to answer this part of your question about Jesus being the Son of God, and hopefully that will help answer the other part of your question as well.

LAMPE: I think the last part of your question is almost impossible to answer: «what really happened?»

It looks like one big part of your question centers around James 2.

They work hand in hand, the ketogenic diets and the intermittent fasting, because they're both trying to do the same thing but they're attacking different parts of the question.

He recalls that part of the questioning went like this:

You seem to be looking at the manager part of the question mostly and disregarding the top four part.

Its a mess and funny part is the title is still part of the question hahahaha we could go all out for the europa our only chance of a trophy in my eyes..

Let's start with the second part of this question first.

Though it's not part of the question, Laurel, her family and the birth family are in and open adoption, both in terms of contact and in openness.

So, it's not that it's irrelevant, but it's not a part of our question now.

for older children, isn't the part of the question that makes us quake just the one little part about how does that sperm get to that egg?

I felt this extreme guilt of not responding properly to what everyone expected of me as a mother or what I idealized of myself as a mother: that, at the time I held the baby for the first time, a magic would happen and my own needs and desires would simply vanish... that I would be complete and happy straight away, only for being a mom... as if this dark part of questioning, frustrations and pains simply don't exist.

The second part of the question can be harder to answer.

As to the last part of your question, using a weak voting system is definitely a real threat to fair voting, but Arrow's theorem doesn't just boil down to «democracy is impossible».

Given that the one answer so far is entirely focused on the second part of this question, and the two parts don't really relate other than that they're both about classification, you may want to split this into two separate questions.

Brythan's answer covered the main (and most interesting) part of the question, the «why» (FPTP system and Duverger's law).

To answer the second part of your question about other seating arrangements: The British House of Commons is set up in a rectangle, with each party on one side of the rectangle and the speaker sitting in between the two aisles.

One interesting part of the question that hasn't been addressed is why a Palestinian state wasn't created in 1948 - 1967 when Arabs hold the now occupied territories.

Your questions were getting downvoted and flagged (even spam flagged), and merging them was the simplest solution to a) calm everyone down and b) having at least part of your question answered.

Finally I need to touch the surveys - related part of your question.

It gets sticky in the second part of the question, how much can Article 9 be rewritten... to that, there's actually quite a bit of freedom.

part of the question you ask is the result of media being manipulated or not being thorough enough in western countries.

@JDoe well, the difference would be the «if it's proven» part of the question.

Bole declined to answer the last part of the question, but said he was happy to clarify the government's position on green - belt land, spelling out that not all of green - belt sites are beautiful meadows, but that some of the land does consist of brown - field sites such as quarries, and this has to be addressed.

@SJuan76 Sorry but oil exploration is somewhat a small part of this question - I am also asking about the wider commercial operations in the International waters

In response to the last part of your question: yes the advertising was aired.

I didn't investigate this, as it's not part of the question.

A good response as to the constitutional methods of lawmaking in the US, but we also should address the deeper part of the question, as to why US citizens don't vote for an equitable redistribution of wealth.

So, to answer the second part of the question, yes, there have been cases where Presidents have simply ignored bills from Congress.

«The technical part of the extent of international interest forms the second part of your question.

@Avi, I will agree that the link addresses the first part of my question, but it does not appear to deal with the second part at all, namely what is the recourse if such (presumably) unconstitional action is taken.

Despite these limitations, it decently answers part of your question and hopefully guides you to a better explanation.