«The problem is that if you don't then make
it part of your accountability measure, then schools will not give it the kind of emphasis that it needs.»
We do not regulate or inspect those who take qualifications, nor do we decide which qualifications are
part of accountability measures.»
Not exact matches
«By every
measure, Governor Cuomo's tax cap has successfully reined in out -
of - control property tax increases and has been a key
part of this administration's efforts to restore fiscal sanity to this state and bring
accountability and rigor to our education system.»
Dropout rates,
measured accurately only since NCLB made them
part of Title I
accountability, hover around 50 percent in many major cities.
The good news is that, in large
part because
of NCLB and the
accountability measures that federal law has encouraged at all levels
of school reform — not to mention the dogged efforts
of Diane Ravitch and Sol Stern to keep Bloomberg and Klein on their toes — these arguments are smarter and more refined — and, yes, despite public relations — more transparent.
He surely has the right to offer greater flexibility to the states when it comes to the law's «adequate yearly progress»
measures and other
parts of its
accountability system.
The report,
part of a book
of essays entitled «The Future
of Assessment: 2025 and Beyond», suggests that current trends in the education sector are «narrowing the curriculum and focusing on those students whose performance has the greatest impact on the headline
accountability measures».
All states that meet federal criteria will now be allowed to take
part in the U.S. Department
of Education's 2 - year - old experiment with «growth models,» which let states
measure individual students» achievement gains as a way
of ensuring
accountability under the No Child Left Behind Act.
As
part of C.M. Rubin's Top Global Teacher Bloggers, this is my response to this month's question: What should a holistic approach to learning look like and how do we shift the focus from the
accountability measures in existence now to ones that are relevant for all students in a changing world?
In addition, principals urged congressional leaders to emphasize that under the new law, states can shift
accountability systems in a way that will appropriately factor student growth
measures, including individual student growth, as
part of a differentiated
accountability model.
«I fully recognize that any system
of accountability will not be able to perfectly
measure teacher effectiveness, but I respectfully disagree with your suggestion that the closest thing states have to an objective
measure of student achievement should not be
part of the equation.
But march organizers and supporters suggest that many teachers have become increasingly frustrated with the test - driven
accountability framework at the heart
of the U.S. education system and look with alarm at the wave
of teacher - evaluation
measures being enacted in some states, pegged in
part to student scores on standardized tests.
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction Tony Evers said the state could employ the «value - added» method developed at UW - Madison to
measure student growth on a new state test as
part of a new state
accountability system for schools.
State departments
of education play an important role in defining expectations for students; how those expectations are
measured; and how information is used to identify, intervene, and support schools and districts as
part of a coherent and «reciprocal» system
of accountability.
The Office
of Community Services (OCS) has spent the last year analyzing the progress on the federal
accountability measures data as a
part of the Community
As Richard Whitmire and I proposed earlier this year, simply requiring gender to be
measured as
part of subgroup
accountability would do plenty to force states and districts into dealing seriously with this problem.
States will need to build new
measures and metrics into their
accountability systems to place greater value on these pathways and credentials as
part of a system that encourages and supports college and career readiness for all students.
Accountability measures for «alternative» charter schools need to be carefully worked out as
part of their authorization contracts, with additional evaluation
measures clearly laid out to go along with traditional performance indicators, according to a new report from the National Association
of Charter School Authorizers.
«What a state chooses to
measure as
part of its
accountability system matters because
accountability systems communicate expectations» (The Education Trust 2017).
As
part of the broader systems
of accountability that states will develop, school classification systems are one way for states to communicate their values and signal to schools which
measures should hold their attention.
Summative assessment at the district / classroom level is an
accountability measure that is generally used as
part of the grading process.
School boards also have a critical role to play in making racial equity
part of their strategic plan and putting
accountability measures in place for closing the various opportunity gaps.
As states select indicators for their school classification systems, which are just one
part a comprehensive
accountability system, they should include
measures that are valid, reliable, and drive behavior at the local level, such as rates
of chronic absenteeism and
measures of college and career readiness.
As this report from FutureEd shows, thirty - six states and the District
of Columbia have adopted
measuring attendance as
part of their school quality indicator for their state
accountability rubric.
As
part of a statewide overhaul
of the school
accountability system, the California State Board
of Education has included chronic absenteeism as one
of the
measures for judging school and student success.
CCSA's
Accountability Framework is made up
of two
parts - an initial review
of publicly available test score and postsecondary readiness data and then, for the subset
of schools underperforming on all initial criteria, a Multiple
Measures Review based on public and non-public data that is tailored to a school's mission and outcomes.
But another purpose that states built toward was that if they wanted to use PARCC as
part of an
accountability system, would it be a reliable
measure.
I offer this scenario as it may help to illustrate why threshold
measures as
part of a performance or
accountability framework are not a good idea.
In its report, Ofqual says: «The regulator concludes that so much weight on one grade in one subject as
part of accountability and performance
measures created perverse incentives for schools in the way they marked controlled assessment and led to the over-marking.»
One
measure to which I would give priority is for children throughout Africa, from the first grade
of primary school through the last year
of secondary school, to be taught the values
of justice, fairness, and
accountability as
part of the normal curriculum, so they might grow into the leaders and citizens that Africa needs.