Sentences with phrase «participant during intervention»

Not exact matches

Participants were briefed about the nutrition status of Bicolanos and the interventions that the government and other partners are implementing to address malnutrition; the nutrition and health aspects of rice, during which much of the discussion involved brown rice and its health benefits; the National Year of Rice campaign; and healthier rice varieties.

During the delivery of the intervention antenatal education session, all male participants were given materials developed to support and complement the session.

A wide range of play and expressive arts interventions will be described and experienced by the participants during the day including use of puppets, drawing and artwork, storytelling, narrative story stems, clinical use of symbols, guided imagery and fantasy techniques, poetry, sand tray, and drama.

Recently infected participants are an important target group for intervention because transmission is particularly likely during this time due to high viral loads, lack of immune response, and potentially elevated rates of risky behaviors.

Maria Carrillo, vice president of medical and scientific relations at the Alzheimer's Association, an advocacy group, applauds NIH's giving the trial a green light: Targeting the APOE4 population will «increase the possibility that participants in the trial will become symptomatic during the period of the study so that the scientists can assess whether the drug intervention is having an impact on delaying or preventing Alzheimer's symptoms, without having to wait 10 or 15 years or more,» she says.

During each three - week residential session, participants learned about interventions to aid weight loss, including eating a balanced, calorie - restricted diet, physical activity, talk therapy and nutrition education.

15 participants completed all immunizations and RMD infusions, with pVL > 20 copies / ml being detected during the intervention in all of them.

The researchers measured the participants in numerous ways, including lipid and glycemic control profiles, cardiovascular workups and quality of life indexes, before, during and after the intervention at 0, six and 24 months respectively.

During the dietary intervention the participants continued to resistance train for 5days / week for 8 weeks.

Participants recorded 3 - d (Thursday — Saturday) weighted dietary intake records to assess potential changes in daily food intake that might have occurred during the intervention period before the onset of the intervention program and in week 11 of the exercise intervention.

During months 7 to 24, participants in the standard intervention group self - reported their daily intake using a website designed for this study, and this information was available to the staff during the intervention telephone conDuring months 7 to 24, participants in the standard intervention group self - reported their daily intake using a website designed for this study, and this information was available to the staff during the intervention telephone conduring the intervention telephone contacts.

During the intervention period, participants continued to contact the research assistants for help with technology questions.

The actigraph was worn by participants during the 2 - day baseline data collection, 1 - week sleep hygiene period, and 2 - week intervention period.

The Scope of this project is to: - Provide seed funding and support pilot implementation of ideas resulting from the June 2014 design workshop on improving outcomes for babies in foster care; - Launch pilots of co-designed strategies for working collaboratively with parents in creating daily, regularized family routines in four sites and evaluate executive function skills, child development, child literacy and parental stress levels of participants pre -, during, and post-intervention; - Build a core group of leaders to help set the strategic direction for Frontiers of Innovation (FOI) and take on leadership for parts of the portfolio; - With Phil Fisher at the University of Oregon and Holly Schindler at the University of Washington develop a measurement and data collection framework and infrastructure in order to collect data from FOI - sponsored pilots and increase cross-site and cross-strategy learning; Organize Building Adult Capabilities Working Group to identify, measure and develop strategies related to executive function and emotional regulation for adults facing high levels of adversity and produce summary report in the fall of 2014 that reviews the knowledge base in this area and implications for intervention, including approaches that impact two generations.

During the intervention phases, participants in the incentive group could earn a reward for adapting their driving behavior (a discount on their insurance premium of maximally 50 Euro per month), and received feedback on their driving behavior via a custom webpage.

In this video you will see Sue Johnson conducting a live session with a couple in Stage I. Subtitles appear during the session that comment on interventions made by Sue as they occur, which will deepen our learning and spark greater discussion for participants.

Students were not informed of their intervention condition in the study, and it is unlikely that respondents knew 6 years later whether they received an intervention or control condition during the elementary grades, thus decreasing the likelihood that participants» self - reported outcomes reflected awareness of their condition assignment.

Three Day Training — 20 CE Hours Next Workshop: Thursday through Saturday, August 23 - 25, 2018 Participants will be able to: • Effectively use the Oral History Interview during a couple's assessment and understand its implications • Clearly explain to a couple their strengths and challenges in terms of the «Sound Relationship House» • Help partners identify their own «Four Horsemen» and understand the antidotes • Select and utilize appropriate tools to help a couple deepen their «Friendship System» • Clarify a couple's conflicts in terms of solvable, perpetual, and grid - locked problems • Use the «Dreams Within Conflict» technique to help a couple feel hopeful and to achieve break - through with their perpetual conflict • Successfully intervene when one or both partners are flooding • Help a couple reach solutions using the Compromise Ovals intervention • Sensitively intervene when co-morbidities are present

The current study covers only the intervention participants and controls who attended the classes in these four schools during the first year of programme implementation.

Four participants chose to withdraw from the project during the study (34 intervention, 34 control participants completed the study).

First, the few studies that have followed participants beyond the immediate intervention period (6 months or less) have noted a decay of intervention effect on behavior over time, 5,6 prompting members of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel: Intervention to Prevent HIV Risk Behavior to identify sustainability of program effectiveness as 1 of the most important questions that professionals who are concerned with risk prevention face.7 A challenge for behavioral change interventions in general, this issue is particularly vexing for interventions that target decreased involvement in sex and substance use with advancing age during adolescence.8, 9 Second, multiple behaviors (sex without a condom, sex with multiple partners, substance use before sex, etc) directly and indirectly place individuals at risk for acquisiintervention period (6 months or less) have noted a decay of intervention effect on behavior over time, 5,6 prompting members of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel: Intervention to Prevent HIV Risk Behavior to identify sustainability of program effectiveness as 1 of the most important questions that professionals who are concerned with risk prevention face.7 A challenge for behavioral change interventions in general, this issue is particularly vexing for interventions that target decreased involvement in sex and substance use with advancing age during adolescence.8, 9 Second, multiple behaviors (sex without a condom, sex with multiple partners, substance use before sex, etc) directly and indirectly place individuals at risk for acquisiintervention effect on behavior over time, 5,6 prompting members of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel: Intervention to Prevent HIV Risk Behavior to identify sustainability of program effectiveness as 1 of the most important questions that professionals who are concerned with risk prevention face.7 A challenge for behavioral change interventions in general, this issue is particularly vexing for interventions that target decreased involvement in sex and substance use with advancing age during adolescence.8, 9 Second, multiple behaviors (sex without a condom, sex with multiple partners, substance use before sex, etc) directly and indirectly place individuals at risk for acquisiIntervention to Prevent HIV Risk Behavior to identify sustainability of program effectiveness as 1 of the most important questions that professionals who are concerned with risk prevention face.7 A challenge for behavioral change interventions in general, this issue is particularly vexing for interventions that target decreased involvement in sex and substance use with advancing age during adolescence.8, 9 Second, multiple behaviors (sex without a condom, sex with multiple partners, substance use before sex, etc) directly and indirectly place individuals at risk for acquisition of HIV.

Participants will learn how to effectively integrate different somatic and ego - state interventions in the treatment of attachment and trauma related syndromes and dissociative symptoms, as well as how to enhance information processing during the EMDR treatment.

Review authors» judgement: was knowledge of the allocated intervention by participants and personnel adequately prevented during the study?

Results indicated that participants in the intervention group experienced a reduction in serious crimes during the year of treatment, and both groups demonstrated reduced rates of offending during the follow - up years.

During the intervention, participants conducted on average 75 minutes of endurance training (IQR: 63 - 98) per week or 16 (IQR: 15 - 21) of 19 recommended endurance units in total.

Participants were randomly assigned during pregnancy or shortly after the birth of the target child to an intervention group that was offered home visiting services or a control group that was given referrals to other services.

Participants are randomly assigned to baseline length, and report weekly during treatment and monthly at follow - up on Belief Strength of negative core beliefs, and fill out SMI, SCL - 90 and SRS - A 7 times during screening procedure (i.e. before baseline), after supportive sessions, after exploration, after cognitive and behavioral interventions, after experiential interventions, and after 5 - and 10 - month follow - up.

These include the Child Study, a multi-site longitudinal randomized controlled trial of the Friends of the Children professional youth mentoring program; the Relief Nursery Study, a randomized controlled trial of a multimodal therapeutic preschool program for at risk children and families; the Parent Child Study, a randomized trial of Parenting Inside Out, a parent management training with incarcerated parents within adult corrections; the Paths Project, a study of the transition into young adulthood for youth who were heavily involved with the juvenile justice system and who participated in a randomized trial of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC, now known as Treatment Foster Care Oregon); and the Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers (LIFT) Project, a study of the transitions into young adulthood for participants in a randomized multi-modal school - based prevention intervention program that began during elementary school.

Eighty - two percent of participants began early intervention services during the first 2 years of their lives.

Furthermore, participants who received the intervention had a decrease in HbA1c from 8.4 % ± 1.3 % to 8.2 % ± 1.1 % compared with the deterioration from 8.3 % ± 1.0 % to 8.7 % ± 1.5 % (P <.05) observed in the control group, as expected during early adolescence [12].

Participants in this quasi-experimental study were 124 mothers: 66 in the intervention group (mothers who received support from Home - Start), and 58 in the comparison group (mothers who reported a high level of parental stress and need for support, but who received no official intervention during the period of the study).

During intervention, all three participants showed substantial decreases in anxiety and problem behavior and significant increases in respiratory sinus arrhythmia in the situations that had previously been identified as anxiety - provoking.