But this and other efforts should, at the very least, reduce the chances that the contributions made by the youngest
participants of scientific studies will be lost.
Not exact matches
«On March 23, 2013, 24
scientific study participants were injected with a dead strain
of Escherichia coli, a bacteria that normally induces violent sickness for days on end.
The
participants were M.I.T.'s Alan Guth, the developer
of the inflationary model
of the universe, Lawrence Krauss, a frequent contributor to
Scientific American magazine and director
of the Origins Initiative at Arizona State University, John Carlstrom from the University
of Chicago, who
studies the cosmic microwave background radiation left over from the big bang and Scott Dodelson
of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, who
studies the origin and structure
of the universe.
The
scientific team conducted two different analyses
of blood samples involving two cohorts
of study participants: 147 toddlers (91 with ASD, 56 control) in the first group, 73 toddlers (44 ASD, 29 control) in the second group.
Maria Carrillo, vice president
of medical and
scientific relations at the Alzheimer's Association, an advocacy group, applauds NIH's giving the trial a green light: Targeting the APOE4 population will «increase the possibility that
participants in the trial will become symptomatic during the period
of the
study so that the scientists can assess whether the drug intervention is having an impact on delaying or preventing Alzheimer's symptoms, without having to wait 10 or 15 years or more,» she says.
Kühn hopes it will provide a more realistic
scientific perspective on the effects
of violent video gaming in real life, and that similar
studies will be done using children as
participants.
In a presentation
of early clinical trial data to the 20th Annual
Scientific Meeting
of the Society for Neuro - Oncology, physician scientists from the University
of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center reported that a large number
of study participants responded well to the drug combination.
However, the vast majority
of study participants also associated global warming with risks wholly contrary to
scientific evidence, such as an increase in the incidence
of skin cancer.
Yet, many long - running volunteer efforts did not originate with the specific purpose
of understanding the consequences
of global climate change, and as a result, most
of these projects were not designed to foster communication
of scientific findings back to project
participants; this is particularly true for
studies using data from online repositories.
Technical coordinator
of a national convention in France involving industry and universities on the same subject Since 1992: Organizer
of a cycle
of international conferences on «Heavy scintillators for
scientific and industrial applications» First one in Chamonix, France in 1992 (200
participants), 9th one in Winston Salem (NC, USA) in 2007 (300
participants) 1994 - 2007: As Technical coordinator
of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter at the LHC Large Hadron Collider, responsible for the technical development and the mass production
of 76» 000 Lead Tungstate crystals (100 tons) 1994 - 2000: Organizer
of the development and mass production organization
of Lutetium Aluminum perovskite crystals, in particular for PET scanner applications Since 2000: Strong involvement in the development
of dedicated breast imaging camera combining several modalities for a multiparametric evaluation
of breast tumors (anatomic, structural and functional) Since 2002: Feasibility
study and setting - up
of an international medical imaging research centre, presently being built in Marseille (Cerimed)
We believe that rapid data release, particularly for
studies involving human subjects and valuable samples, better serves the
scientific community as well as the
participants in the
study than does the standard practice
of data release after publication.
For example, a lot
of scientific studies (including nutrition ones) exclude women
participants due to the effect the menstrual cycle has on metabolism.
Participants will discover the techniques
of studying river courses and conduct research under the guidance
of scientific educators with the Swiss - based NGO
Recognizing that priorities for both laboratory - based investigation and community - based action are determined by the meeting
participants, a preliminary menu
of potential topics includes the following: 1) Advancing the frontiers
of scientific research: • construct a developmental framework to
study the differential effects
of biological embedding
of significant adversity related to age, beginning in the prenatal period and extending into adulthood.
During the course
of this Programme,
participants will all be immersed in different
scientific studies and projects relating to aquatic life in forests and highlands.
For example, in a recent
study of preservice teachers» conceptions
of lunar phases, researchers reported pre - to postinstructional gains in
scientific conceptions
of more than 80 % for
participants who used an astronomy simulation in the context
of inquiry instruction (Bell & Trundle, 2008).
This report collects the results
of all available empirical
studies using the best available
scientific methods to measure how school vouchers affect academic outcomes for
participants, and all available
studies on how vouchers affect outcomes in public schools.
Greg Forster
of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice collected the results
of all available empirical
studies using the best available
scientific methods to measure how school vouchers affect academic outcomes for
participants, and all available
studies on how vouchers affect outcomes in public schools.
This quarterly digital update gives you the latest information on the
study, as well as
scientific highlights and a chance to meet some
of our enrolled
participants.
IIRC even as late as 1995, it was necessary for the summary for policymakers to substantially misrepresent the
scientific opinions
of the
participants in the
study.
Study 3 used a blind test in which participants did not know what (anonymized) content they were judging and what the study was about, so this is fairly strong evidence that blogosphere material was not providing a trenchant criticism of scientific
Study 3 used a blind test in which
participants did not know what (anonymized) content they were judging and what the
study was about, so this is fairly strong evidence that blogosphere material was not providing a trenchant criticism of scientific
study was about, so this is fairly strong evidence that blogosphere material was not providing a trenchant criticism
of scientific work.
Specifically, the information on geoengineering that was presented to the
study participants (in the form
of a fictional newspaper article) bears no relation to mainstream
scientific opinion on geoengineering nor, even, to the opinions
of advocates
of geoengineering.
The book's wide - ranging exploration
of scientific studies and the encouragement to people
of every age to become citizen scientists and active
participants for change make this a valuable purchase.
Participants considered the importance
of land ECVs in terms
of scientific impact and the availability
of longer - term data sets for comparison and
study.
Participants in a year - long
study who doubted the
scientific consensus on the issue «opposed policy solutions,» but at the same time, they «were most likely to report engaging in individual - level, pro-environmental behaviors,» writes a research team led by University
of Michigan psychologist Michael Hall.
To be reliable,
scientific studies have to have a lot
of participants, be double - blind (meaning nobody knows who's getting what), and
study subjects have to be randomly assigned to treatment, no treatment, or placebo.
The only
scientific research suggesting that secret relationships might be fun and exciting comes from a set
of studies published two decades ago in which college student
participants reported that having a secret crush is «hot» and that playing secret «footsie» underneath a table with an attractive stranger is exciting [4].
In order for the
scientific discipline
of psychology to exist, we need
participants who are willing to take our
studies, come to our labs, fill out our measures, or answer our questions online.