In this case, the Board could participate without compromising the principles of finality and impartiality (at paras. 60 - 62) and, although Rothstein J. sounded a «note of caution» about the Board's suggestion that even if it lost on judicial review it would reach the same result in fresh proceedings, he felt «the Board generally acted in such a way as to present helpful argument in an adversarial but respectful manner» (at para. 72
In this case, the Board could
participate without compromising the principles of finality and impartiality (at paras. 60 - 62) and, although Rothstein J. sounded a «note of caution» about the Board's suggestion that even if it lost on judicial review it would reach the same result
in fresh proceedings, he felt «the Board generally acted in such a way as to present helpful argument in an adversarial but respectful manner» (at para. 72
in fresh proceedings, he felt «the Board generally acted
in such a way as to present helpful argument in an adversarial but respectful manner» (at para. 72
in such a
way as to present
helpful argument
in an adversarial but respectful manner» (at para. 72
in an adversarial but respectful manner» (at para. 72).