For that matter why is it that
that particular church named itself what it did?
Not exact matches
In every
church I have served I still remember a few
particular names and faces.
In light of that pivotal text, Volf understands the
church as «a community of grace» which gathers in Christ's
name in a
particular locality.
This
church has many buildings as part of their complex, and ironically, as I was sitting there in my car, looking through the barb wire, the angle was perfect to see the
name of this
particular building.
So Pope Francis has
named, as a saint of
particular theological distinction, someone from a separated
church — someone who was not, in fact, a Catholic at all.
Some of my Episcopal friends tell me that episcopacy is not a
name for a
particular kind of
church constitution (as Presbyterians might suppose), but rather an understanding of representative authority and responsibility in ministry vested in a college of «sacramental persons» — an understanding compatible with a wide range of constitutional theories and structures.
The local
church bears a distinctive
name to indicate, even in eases where one family rules the parish, that the congregation is not synonymous with a
particular bond of flesh.
The local
church bears a distinctive
name to indicate... that the congregation is not synonymous with a
particular bond of flesh.»
One who bore a human
name and died under a
particular signature of his own is the Lord whom the
Church confesses.
He wrote, «If everything that the
Church does is to be classed as «mission,» we shall have to find another term for the
Church's
particular responsibility for «the heathen,» those who have never yet heard the
Name of Christ...» (ibid.)
But evangelicals thought of their «
churches» as «denominations» where «the word «denomination» implies that the group referred to is but one member of a larger group, called or denominated by a
particular name.