Sentences with phrase «particular claim in question»

They are right to do so as long as the particular claim in question can not — even in principle — be examined by science.

Not exact matches

The reason for my present line of questioning with Steve and Brigitte is due their repeated claims of «truth» and «reality» being in alignment with their particular brand of beliefs.

He will mistrust or reject, however, specific moral maxims which, by their universality and eternally permanent character, claim to bind men in every situation without exception, on the sole condition that the universal norm, expressing an essence, is relevant to the particular human being in this or that definite situation, precisely because of the presence there of what the maxim in question designates and applies to.

Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29

It's interesting that in one breath Mr. Cabreras can claim that the government can't answer the questions of how people should deal with the tragedy, and in the very next breath claim that they are obligated to do exactly that by giving him or someone else like him the forum to proclaim their one particular take on it that excludes other options.

Section IV of chapter 3 is taken up with a detailed analysis of this ethical problem, and of its parameters, and in particular, a thorough biological analysis of the continuity / discontinuity question is presented: «whether to claim that [biological findings] teach us about an embryo's essential continuity withand similarity to human beings at other stages of life, or to argue that they reveal profound and morally meaningful discontinuities between embryos and live - born persons.»

this thinking is a false narrative to suit a particular ideology that wenger is not to be brought to question by the «average fan», but I remember us relying on mathieu flamini in cm for a large portion of last season, that doesn't sound to me like a very knowledgeable decision by a club apparently as ambitious as we claim to be

I am curious why you pose the question about balance in response to this particular blog post, which addresses the hyperbole surrounding certain of the NCB movement's claims.

In a statement released by the DNC, Brazile claimed she helped all Democratic campaigns, but denied forwarding particular questions to candidates.

In particular, a number of teaching staff have claimed there were numerous problems with the questioning used in the papers, including the way some questions were phraseIn particular, a number of teaching staff have claimed there were numerous problems with the questioning used in the papers, including the way some questions were phrasein the papers, including the way some questions were phrased.

If the breeder claims membership of any particular kennel club or breeders association, ask the club in question for an account of them or authentication as it is not uncommon for fake documents to be used

Thirdly, I made it clear from the start of this particular thread that I was not referring to any aspect of the temperature run - up in question other than the widely asserted claim that a «lack of volcanic activity» contributed to it in some meaningful way.

So if a scientist questions the adequacy of present climate models, or fails to find conclusive evidence for global warming in a particular data - set, he or she is often reported as claiming that «there isn't really a problem».

They're the adults now who don't have any particular interest in science but «remember the science from school» and so unlikely to question whatever the AGW green agenda pushes, and even those in actual science fields where real knowledge of gas properties isn't relelevant, but what I find astonishing though, is how many in actual science fields who come together to discuss AGW continue to not question something as basic as the difference between heat and light claims in the AGW energy budget which is well known still in the real science world.

Furthermore, U.S. Department of Defense spokesperson Eric D. Badger, Maj, USAF, addressed questions from several legislators in early 2017 who incorrectly claimed that the operation of North Carolina's first wind farm, Amazon US East, would negatively impact a particular radar installation in Virginia («ROTHR»), stating: «The Department of Defense has concluded that the project, with site - specific stipulations defined in a written mitigation agreement between the developer and the DoD, is not expected to create an adverse impact on DoD's readiness and operations.

They do not do provide any depth to the extent that they have any particular focus on Bangladesh, or the UK, or the non-modelled basis for the claims in question.

Nobody has made a claim of more storms by count in particular basins, so any evidence on that matter seems not germane to the present question.

Relevant to this question is the bankruptcy (automatic stay) tolling of time when a bankruptcy is active and whether that does or does not apply to the facts of this particular situation as to does the automatic stay of bankruptcy stop the statue of limitation clock (6 year clock in Washington State) in tolling the time to seek a claim against another party.

Placing an onus on the applicant to substantiate the general importance of their issues in the context of their particular claim seems like a lot to ask of them, and moreover the assessment by a justice in chambers on what constitutes a question of general importance or one with a reasonable prospect of success seems like a very subjective assessment from my review of decisions in this area.

In particular, the question was where a support payor owns a life insurance policy and is required to name the support recipient as irrevocable beneficiary of the policy, what rights does the support recipient have to the policy proceeds in the face of a competing claim of another dependant of the deceased payor brought under the Succession Law Reform Act («SLRA»In particular, the question was where a support payor owns a life insurance policy and is required to name the support recipient as irrevocable beneficiary of the policy, what rights does the support recipient have to the policy proceeds in the face of a competing claim of another dependant of the deceased payor brought under the Succession Law Reform Act («SLRA»in the face of a competing claim of another dependant of the deceased payor brought under the Succession Law Reform Act («SLRA»).

While Investopedia may edit questions provided by users for grammar, punctuation, profanity, and question title length, Investopedia is not involved in the questions and answers between advisors and users, does not endorse any particular financial advisor that provides answers via the service, and is not responsible for any claims made by any advisor.

In particular I took great exception to the fact that agents were running a muck claiming that IUL was the answer to any question about life insurance you had.

In addition, the available pool of appropriate expert referees is small and parties may legitimately hold strong views about the appropriateness of a particular referee, particularly where the relevant question referred is pivotal to the claim.