Sentences with phrase «particular decision makers»

Not exact matches

Event sponsorship, in particular, is an attractive option because it provides a business with access to various audiences, including employees, business decision makers, and government regulators as well as consumers.

Worse, do they erode our confidence in particular decision - makers, or in political decision - making altogether?

McDonald says the degrees of separation within a particular industry are getting smaller and someone who once worked for your company could end up being a decision maker who gives the green or red light to another company buying your products or services.

However, I think the awareness - raising effort is primarily directed at the public, and in particular those who can, by way of investment choices (whether as a shareholder or a tourist), put economic pressure on those decision - makers.

By expanding the scope from wine to spirits, water, and oils, the extensive promotional campaign — directed in particular at decision - makers -LSB-...]

Experimenting in this format in this particular case is helpful, as the decision makers in F1 can simulate the opening three laps with various alterations to the starting grid and then have the data at hand to make an informed decision.

In particular, the rules encourage members to accept a predetermined sanction for given acts of misconduct rather than undergoing a full tribunal, but establish an impartial panel of decision makers with clear rules for evidence and standards of proof should a full disciplinary hearing be required.

This allows decision makers to make informed decisions based on their particular preference.

In particular, he says, decision - makers should consider whether a gain - of - function study makes a contribution to a public - health goal, such as the prevention and treatment of flu, that could justify both the risk and the use of money that could be spent on safer research.

City decision makers can see how much people are willing to pay for a project if it achieves a particular mix of outcomes,» she said.

On the high end, recent work suggests that 4 feet is plausible.23, 3,6,7,8 In the context of risk - based analysis, some decision makers may wish to use a wider range of scenarios, from 8 inches to 6.6 feet by 2100.10,2 In particular, the high end of these scenarios may be useful for decision makers with a low tolerance for risk (see Figure 2.26 on global sea level rise).10, 2 Although scientists can not yet assign likelihood to any particular scenario, in general, higher emissions scenarios that lead to more warming would be expected to lead to higher amounts of sea level rise.

Also, Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) has to be defined and adapted regionally, nationally and locally, for nations, cities and communities to understand their particular sustainability challenges, their needs and available resources as well as to empower them to undertake concrete actions and efforts to enhance the mindset of decision makers and all citizens.

From a summative point of view, users at the classroom and periodic assessment levels want evidence of mastery of particular standards; at the annual testing level, decision makers want the percentage of students meeting each standard.

The study will have a particular focus on systems» reform journeys and decision points, and what can be learned from those stories to develop a system - level school leadership development strategy, drawing out implications for policy makers in the United States.

Besides helping the students to focus on their studies, it teaches them to be a decision maker and to opine on a particular matter.

You might be a practice decision maker, or a team member with a passion for Fear Free that is interested in presenting a proposal to management, or a desire to take on a particular portion of the project.

This analysis is based on a set of interviews with decision - makers, in particular World Bank project leaders, and on a literature review on decision - making under uncertainty.

So I suggest we should very concerned about whether the relevant decision makers have the necessary moral character to take tough decisions on mitigation and adaptation, rather than adopting the hope of geoengineering as an excuse for not upsetting political allies, campaign funders or particular groups of voters.

This principle allows policy makers to make discretionary decisions in situations where there is the possibility of harm from taking a particular course or making a certain decision when extensive scientific knowledge on the matter is lacking.

Rather, all that could be said is that a decision maker must be satisfied of the truth of a particular fact.

Her divergence from the majority in both decisions rested on the view that judicial deference is based upon the principle of relative expertise or experience in a particular area, and thus this bare assertion of a presumption of deference simply because a statutory decision - maker is interpreting its home statute pays too little attention to whether the statutory decision - maker actually has sufficient expertise or experience to justify deference to its determination of a legal question (See Alliance Pipeline at para 80 and Alberta Teachers» Association at paras 82 — 89).

Dunsmuir also confirmed that precedent is established on the applicable standard of review for a particular decision - maker in relation to a particular type of decision or question (Dunsmuir at para 62).

Fact - sensitive as it may be, the level of disclosure required is quite clearly a question of law to be decided ultimately by the court: any suggestion in R v Airport Co-ordination Ltd, ex parte Aravco [1999] EuLR 939 (in particular, at 949G - H) that the requirements of fair consultation was a matter of discretion for the decision - maker was disavowed, albeit that the decision - maker's considered view may carry some weight with the court: Eisai [32].

Such steps are not uncommon, particular in matters of economic regulation, and it may be that they will become expected of decision - makers where circumstances demand.

[5] During the first stage of the analysis, reviewing courts were charged with examining four factors: whether there was a privative, or conversely an appeal, clause in the decision maker's home statute; [6] whether the decision maker was relatively more expert than the reviewing court in respect of the decision under review; what the purpose of the statutory scheme and of the particular provision or provisions at issue was; and what the nature of the question in dispute was.

For example, the SCC clarified that the «expertise» of tribunals (that warrants deference by courts) does not depend on «the qualifications or experience of any particular tribunal member», but arises at an institutional level, where decision - makers «can be presumed to hold relative expertise...» (Edmonton (City) v. Edmonton East (Capilano) Shopping Centres Ltd., 2016 SCC 47 at para. 33).

Yes, this looks a lot like the Pushpanathan list of factors, [14] but the difference is that these factors are being considered not to decide on the standard of review — correctness, reasonableness and patent unreasonableness — but rather to determine the extent to which the court should defer to an administrative decision in the context of a particular case and a particular question — that is, the range of options that are legally open to the decision maker.

Regrettably, the same jurisprudence also shows the deference obligation has had little impact on case outcomes and, in particular, those tied to the interpretation of the decision - maker's enabling legislation.

And there is no doubt that the legislature often intends to confer sufficient authority on the administrative decision maker to provide the substantive details within the bounds the legislature has set, based on the decision maker's understanding of that particular legal area and what is required in individual cases to achieve the objectives of the governing legislation.

It should instead let administrative judicial review be a matter of practice and the appropriate judicial attitude, one of respectful attention to any decision - maker's reasons for a particular decision, while recognizing that judges provide a sober second thought through judicial review, particularly on matters of legal interpretation.

For example, Madam Justice Deschamps wrote a concurring opinion in Alberta Teachers» Association on the view that judicial deference is based upon the principle of relative expertise or experience in a particular area, and thus a bare assertion of a presumption of deference simply because a statutory decision - maker is interpreting its home statute pays too little attention to whether the statutory decision - maker actually has sufficient expertise or experience to justify deference to its determination of a legal question (Alberta Teachers» Association at paras 82 — 89).

Whether a third - party neutral serves primarily as a facilitator, evaluator or decision maker depends on the particular process that is either selected by the parties or mandated by a court.

Nothing Dunsmuir says about the rule of law suggests that constitutional compliance dictates how many standards of review are required; the only requirement is that «there be judicial review in order to ensure, in particular, that decision - makers do not exercise authority they do not have» (emphasis in original).

(iv) Whether or not the evidence in any particular case, taken as a whole, proves that the offender's conduct demonstrated hostility to such a group, or was motivated by such hostility, is a question of fact for the decision - makers in the case.

I would like to see the system adapted to allow planning decision makers greater discretion in determining cases, and striking the balance, on the particular facts and merits of the case.

In particular, it is very doubtful that the right of access to superior courts constiutionalized in Trial Lawyers extends to provincial court and to administrative tribunals (which is to say, to the sort of decision - maker at issue in Unison!)

This chimes with Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR's (as he then was) comment, made in the EU law context, that «[t] he breadth of the margin of appreciation in relation to any decision thus depends on the circumstances of the case and, in particular, on the identity of the decision - maker, the nature of the decision, the reasons for the decision, and the effect of the decision».

Deference is imperative for «processes and determinations that draw on particular expertise and experiences», but not for all questions of law, merely because the question is raised by a decision - maker's home statute.

The only requirement is that «there be judicial review in order to ensure, in particular, that decision - makers do not exercise authority they do not have» (emphasis in original).

In short, deference requires respect for the legislative choices to leave some matters in the hands of administrative decision makers, for the processes and determinations that draw on particular expertise and experiences, and for the different roles of the courts and administrative bodies within the Canadian constitutional system.

Also in 2011, the SCC held that a decision may imply a particular interpretation of a statutory provision, even if the decision - maker has not expressed an opinion on that provision's meaning (Alberta Teachers» Association, 2011 SCC 61).

This is quite unlike the application of, say, the rules of evidence, which an administrative decision - maker can tailor to fit a particular context.

Does your professional headline, in particular, contain the most important relevant keywords that recruiters and hiring decision makers will be searching to find candidates like you?

Make it new and fresh and really sell your candidacy to this particular decision - maker for this particular job.

In most instances, he / she is the sole decision maker in the restaurant, depending on the organizational setup of the particular restaurant in question.

(48) Furthermore, the «opportunity to comment» provisions place no obligation on the decision maker to «make any particular use of the information provided by way of comment or to act in a way that will ensure that no harm is done to native title interests or that such harm is minimised».

This study will yield findings useful to decision makers in crafting effective child care policies and strategies, in particular about the impact of varying hours of early care and education on children's school readiness, and the specific factors in both infant and preschool classrooms that promote children's school readiness.

Policy and practice decision - makers need to pay particular attention to parents who are most at risk: they need find ways to facilitate change in parents» behaviours, taking into consideration factors such as parent beliefs, social support, mental health status, in order to maximize effectiveness.

In particular, the NLC argued that when making a decision that the expedited procedure applies to a proposed future act, the decision - maker is required by law to consider the matters listed in section 237 of the NTA.