Sentences with phrase «particular issues before the court»

Not exact matches

He did not mention which particular government agency was responsible but expressed concern that the government had resorted to self - help instead of allowing the court to resolve issues before the court.

Those in the education community have been studying Gorsuch with particular interest, given the critical issues before the court.

[14] Lawyers» affidavits can be quite helpful in cases where the lawyers, or their staff, have particular knowledge relevant to the facts in issue before the court.

It is common experience that it is advantageous to read all the available papers so as to gain an overview of the entire case rather than limit that task to the relatively small area that is truly relevant to the expert's own field for the expert evidence in a particular case must be given in relation to the whole case if the opinion is to be of real value to the court when it comes to decide on the issues before it.

The more informed a judge can become about the nuances of a particular area of the law before issuing a ruling, the more likely it is that the court will issue the best possible ruling in the case.

That was a question that was addressed in the Court of Appeal, before the Supreme Court was established, in Attorney - General v E. I referred to that case and in particular to the dissenting judgment of Thomas J who complained of what he called the «judicial minimalism», namely «resolving the issue before the Court and nothing more».

Homburger represents its clients before Swiss courts and arbitration tribunals in employment - related matters and advises on all employment law issues, in particular on: employment contracts for executives, including compensation packages, non-compete covenants and «golden parachutes»; standard employment contracts and customised employment concepts (contracts, regulations, employee handbooks); employee participation plans and variable compensation schemes (e.g., long - term incentive schemes, management participation on acquisitions, stock option plans, bonus and gratification schemes); transfer of business units and outsourcing; business restructuring (staff reduction, collective dismissals), contract and gardening leave; data protection; and posting of employees and work permit applications.

As the Postscript of the judgment reminds us, these were private proceedings where the parents had asked the Court to decide the issue as opposed to care proceedings where the State is intruding uninvited into the private sphere of a particular family or community and where there is a preliminary threshold to be overcome before the State can intervene.

But while we concentrate on considering how the criminal courts receive evidence and deal with it in considering fairness, and where criminal proceedings have concluded before civil proceedings, there are also further and particular issues for the civil courts.

Jonathan has particular expertise in human rights issues that arise in the education sector and, as well as having acted in the leading domestic case on the right to education under article 2 of the First Protocol, he is currently representing the United Kingdom Government in an article 2 case before the European Court of Human Rights.

If a court has issued an order on non-return pursuant to Article 13 of the 1980 Hague Convention, the court must immediately either directly or through its central authority, transmit a copy of the court order on non-return and of the relevant documents, in particular a transcript of the hearings before the court, to the court with jurisdiction or central authority in the Member State where the child was habitually resident immediately before the wrongful removal or retention, as determined by national law.

In this particular instance I believe the Court made the right decision, as the issue before it is one of particularly complex balancings and nuanced societal perspectives.

78 In particular, in a case such as that before the referring court, it is important that the competent authorities of the host Member State are able, when examining the application of a Union citizen who is not economically active and is in Mr Brey's position, to take into account, inter alia, the following: the amount and the regularity of the income which he receives; the fact that those factors have led those authorities to issue him with a certificate of residence; and the period during which the benefit applied for is likely to be granted to him.

1.9 The guideline recognises the Court's ability to make suitable orders is limited to issues, based on evidence, which have been put before it by the parents and / or an Independent Children's Lawyer as to why a particular order should or should not be made.