Not exact matches
In particular, consider the following question: Can you think of a market in any item where each item was priced perfectly, so that every (rational) person agreed on its valu
In particular, consider the following
question: Can you think of a market
in any item where each item was priced perfectly, so that every (rational) person agreed on its valu
in any
item where each
item was priced perfectly, so that every (rational) person agreed on its value?
Regarding the «when to label as gluten - free» issue, I usually do so when the
item in question usually / sometimes contains gluten when prepared «normally,» but doesn't
in this
particular recipe — so I wouldn't say «gluten - free ice cream» but I would say «gluten - free brownies.»
(If you have any
questions about a
particular items, please ask me about it
in the comments.)
«So, they might have different icons or
items on the screen that they would have to go and search for, or click onto, jump on, put
in a basket... and that would open up a
question related to one of their subject areas and the
particular issue.
For example,
questions in the area of reading include what
items a student might read (e.g., what online sites, magazines, or comics) with follow - up
questions such as what students like or dislike about a
particular material, whether they look at pictures or words more, what type of images are
in the reading, and with whom they might read.
In particular, the difficulty and uniqueness of the words calls into
question Foorman et al.'s comparisons of the percentage of children who failed to pronounce even one or two
items correctly (pp. 45 - 46).
The technical explanation,
in part, is that test designers try to build
questions that avoid Differential
Item Functioning (DIF)- items in which students from different groups (commonly gender or ethnicity) with the same underlying achievement levels have a different probability of giving a certain response on that particular i
Item Functioning (DIF)-
items in which students from different groups (commonly gender or ethnicity) with the same underlying achievement levels have a different probability of giving a certain response on that
particular itemitem.
The example suggested that if students do not know the meaning of a
particular word
in a test
item, they would be taught to replace it with an «X» and focus instead on grasping the logic of the
question phrasing that will give them a better chance of selecting the correct answer.
Going back and forth with authors
in response to
questions about why I'm reaching out to one
particular reporter instead of another at, say, the Boston Globe, or being given to - do lists and asked to account for each
item takes time and energy away from doing my job and doing it well.